• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伪善会缓和道德品质判断中的自我利益偏见。

Hypocrisy moderates self-interest bias in moral character judgments.

作者信息

Bocian Konrad, Myslinska Szarek Katarzyna, Miazek Katarzyna

机构信息

Department of Psychology in Sopot, SWPS University.

出版信息

J Soc Psychol. 2024 Aug 29:1-16. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2024.2393093.

DOI:10.1080/00224545.2024.2393093
PMID:39207885
Abstract

Self-interest bias describes an observer's tendency to judge moral transgression leniently when they benefit from it. However, what factors moderate the self-interest bias is an open empirical question. Here, we investigated to what extent hypocrisy moderates the self-interest bias. Preregistered Study 1a ( = 194) and replication in Study 1b ( = 193) demonstrated that observers' interest impacts moral character judgments of hypocritical transgressors. This effect was explained by observers' goal attainment due to transgression (Study 2,  = 713) and agreement to aid observers' or ingroup interests (Study 3,  = 634). Importantly, transgressors' hypocrisy moderated the impact of observers' interests in moral character judgments (Studies 2 & 3). In summary, when judging hypocritical transgressors, peoples' moral character judgments tend to be biased by their or their group's interests. However, in comparison to non-hypocritical transgressors, this impact is less pronounced.

摘要

自我利益偏差描述了观察者在从道德违规行为中获益时,倾向于从轻评判该行为的现象。然而,哪些因素会调节自我利益偏差仍是一个有待实证研究的开放性问题。在此,我们研究了伪善在多大程度上调节自我利益偏差。预先注册的研究1a(n = 194)以及研究1b中的重复验证(n = 193)表明,观察者的自身利益会影响对伪善违规者的道德品质判断。这一效应可通过违规行为导致观察者目标的达成(研究2,n = 713)以及对观察者或内群体利益的支持(研究3,n = 634)来解释。重要的是,违规者的伪善调节了观察者自身利益在道德品质判断中的影响(研究2和研究3)。总之,在评判伪善的违规者时,人们的道德品质判断往往会受到自身或其群体利益的影响。然而,与非伪善的违规者相比,这种影响并不那么明显。

相似文献

1
Hypocrisy moderates self-interest bias in moral character judgments.伪善会缓和道德品质判断中的自我利益偏见。
J Soc Psychol. 2024 Aug 29:1-16. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2024.2393093.
2
Punishing hypocrisy: the roles of hypocrisy and moral emotions in deciding culpability and punishment of criminal and civil moral transgressors.惩罚伪善:伪善与道德情感在判定刑事和民事道德违规者的罪责及惩罚中的作用。
Cogn Emot. 2014;28(1):59-83. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.801339. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
3
Unmasking Moral Hypocrisy: How Preschoolers Perceive and Judge Moral Hypocrites.揭开道德伪善的面具:学龄前儿童如何看待和评判道德伪君子。
Dev Sci. 2025 Jan;28(1):e13580. doi: 10.1111/desc.13580. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
4
Self-Interest Bias in Moral Judgments of Others' Actions.对他人行为道德判断中的自利偏差。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Jul;40(7):898-909. doi: 10.1177/0146167214529800. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
5
Does group membership affect children's judgments of social transgressions?群体归属是否会影响儿童对社会违规行为的判断?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Jan;189:104695. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104695. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
6
The boundary conditions of the liking bias in moral character judgments.道德品性判断中喜欢偏差的边界条件。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 14;12(1):17217. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22147-7.
7
Unveiling the Paradox of Selflessness: Exploring Perceptions of Hypocrisy and Priority Outgroup in Intergroup Moral Dilemmas.揭示无私的悖论:探索群体间道德困境中对伪善和优先外群体的认知。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Mar 20;17:1295-1311. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S452940. eCollection 2024.
8
What drives disagreement about moral hypocrisy? Perceived comparability and how people exploit it to criticize enemies and defend allies.
Cognition. 2024 Jun;247:105773. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105773. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
9
Social perception in moral judgments of interpersonal transgressions.社会感知在人际侵犯的道德判断中的作用。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Apr;44:177-181. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.006. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
10
Are young children's preferences and evaluations of moral and conventional transgressors associated with domain distinctions in judgments?幼儿对道德和传统违规者的偏好和评价是否与判断中的领域区别有关?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Sep;173:284-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 May 14.