• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蒙特利尔认知评估量表的听觉项目(MoCA-22):常模数据及可靠变化指数

Montreal Cognitive Assessment's auditory items (MoCA-22): Normative data and reliable change indices.

作者信息

Amitrano Nicholas R, Lord Alinda Rafaela, González David Andrés

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL, USA.

Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Aug 29:1-8. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2396380.

DOI:10.1080/23279095.2024.2396380
PMID:39207946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11869320/
Abstract

Our objective was to establish normative data and reliable change indices (RCI) for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment's auditory items (MoCA-22). 4,935 cognitively unimpaired participants were administered the MoCA during an in-person visit to an Alzheimer's Disease Research Center ( = 67.9, = 16.2, 65.8% women, 75.9% non-Hispanic-White), with 2,319 unimpaired participants returning for follow-up. Normative values and cutoffs were developed using demographic predictions from ordinary and quantile regression. Test-retest reliability was calculated using Spearman and intraclass correlations. RCI values were calculated using Chelune and colleagues' (1993) formula. Education, age, and sex were all statistically related to MoCA-22 scores, with education having the strongest relationship. Notably, these relationships were not consistent across MoCA-22 quantiles, with education becoming more important and sex becoming less important for predicting low scores. These models were integrated into a calculator for deriving normative scores for an individual case. Furthermore, there was adequate-to-good test-retest reliability (ϱ = 0.56 95% CI [.54, .59]; ICC = 0.75, 95% CI [.73, .77]) and changes of at least 2-3 points are necessary to identify reliable change at 1-3-year follow-up. These findings add to the literature regarding utility of the MoCA-22 in the cognitive screening of older adults.

摘要

我们的目标是为蒙特利尔认知评估量表的听觉项目(MoCA-22)建立常模数据和可靠变化指数(RCI)。4935名认知功能未受损的参与者在前往阿尔茨海默病研究中心进行面对面访视时接受了MoCA测试(年龄均值=67.9岁,标准差=16.2,65.8%为女性,75.9%为非西班牙裔白人),其中2319名未受损参与者返回进行随访。使用普通回归和分位数回归的人口统计学预测来制定常模值和临界值。通过斯皮尔曼相关性和组内相关性计算重测信度。RCI值使用Chelune及其同事(1993年)的公式计算。教育程度、年龄和性别均与MoCA-22得分存在统计学关联,其中教育程度的关联最强。值得注意的是,这些关系在MoCA-22的各个分位数上并不一致,对于预测低分而言,教育程度变得更为重要,而性别变得不那么重要。这些模型被整合到一个计算器中,用于得出单个病例的常模分数。此外,可以观察到良好的重测信度(ϱ = 0.56,95%置信区间[.54, . .59];组内相关系数ICC = 0.75,95%置信区间[.73, .77]),并且在1至3年的随访中,至少2至3分的变化对于识别可靠变化是必要的。这些发现为有关MoCA-22在老年人认知筛查中的效用的文献增添了内容。

相似文献

1
Montreal Cognitive Assessment's auditory items (MoCA-22): Normative data and reliable change indices.蒙特利尔认知评估量表的听觉项目(MoCA-22):常模数据及可靠变化指数
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Aug 29:1-8. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2396380.
2
Reliability and validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment's auditory items (MoCA-22).蒙特利尔认知评估量表听觉项目(MoCA-22)的信度和效度。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Apr;38(3):783-798. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2023.2261634. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
3
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Norms and Reliable Change Indices for Standard and MoCA-22 Administrations.蒙特利尔认知评估:标准和 MoCA-22 管理的常模和可靠变化指数。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Aug 24;39(6):747-765. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acae013.
4
Reliability of the NACC Telephone-administered Neuropsychological Battery (T-cog) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment for participants in the USC ADRC.南加州大学阿尔茨海默病研究中心(USC ADRC)参与者的NACC电话神经心理测验组合(T-cog)和蒙特利尔认知评估的可靠性。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2023 Mar 8;15(1):e12406. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12406. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
5
Normative Data of Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale of Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Taiwan.台湾地区社区居住的老年人群体中简易精神状态检查、蒙特利尔认知评估和阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表的常模数据。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2022;51(4):365-376. doi: 10.1159/000525615. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
6
Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination reliable change indices in healthy older adults.蒙特利尔认知评估与简易精神状态检查在健康老年人中的可靠变化指数。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;32(8):868-875. doi: 10.1002/gps.4539. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
7
Psychometric properties of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in healthy participants aged 18-70.蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)在 18-70 岁健康参与者中的心理测量学特性。
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2020 Sep;24(3):293-300. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2020.1746348. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
8
Robust demographically-adjusted normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): Results from the systolic blood pressure intervention trial.蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)的稳健人口统计学调整规范数据:来自收缩压干预试验的结果。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Nov;36(8):2237-2259. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1967450. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
9
Effects of Normative Adjustments to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.蒙特利尔认知评估量表的常模调整效应。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;26(12):1258-1267. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
10
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): An update normative study for the Portuguese population.蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA):葡萄牙人群的更新常模研究
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2025 Jul-Aug;32(4):1148-1154. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2023.2252949. Epub 2023 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Differential Validity of K-MoCA-22 Compared to K-MoCA-30 and K-MMSE for Screening MCI and Dementia.与K-MoCA-30和K-MMSE相比,K-MoCA-22在筛查轻度认知障碍和痴呆方面的差异效度。
Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2024 Oct;23(4):236-244. doi: 10.12779/dnd.2024.23.4.236. Epub 2024 Oct 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Seven Strategies to Integrate Equity within Translational Research in Neurology.神经内科转化研究中纳入公平性的 7 大策略。
Ann Neurol. 2024 Mar;95(3):432-441. doi: 10.1002/ana.26873. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
2
Improvement of Norm Score Quality via Regression-Based Continuous Norming.通过基于回归的连续常模化提高常模分数质量
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Apr;81(2):229-261. doi: 10.1177/0013164420928457. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
3
Reliability and validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment's auditory items (MoCA-22).蒙特利尔认知评估量表听觉项目(MoCA-22)的信度和效度。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Apr;38(3):783-798. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2023.2261634. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
4
Re-Engaging Individuals & Societies for Structural Evolution: A Brain Health Equity Neuropsychology Research Framework.为结构演变让个体与社会重新参与:一个脑健康公平神经心理学研究框架
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Apr 26;38(3):347-364. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acad011.
5
Classification statistics of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): Are we interpreting the MoCA correctly?蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)的分类统计:我们对 MoCA 的解读是否正确?
Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Apr;37(3):562-576. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2022.2086487. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
6
Videoconference version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment: normative data for Quebec-French people aged 50 years and older.50 岁及以上魁北克法语人群的视频会议版蒙特利尔认知评估:常模数据。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022 Jul;34(7):1627-1633. doi: 10.1007/s40520-022-02092-1. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
7
Performance-based alternatives to race-norms in neuropsychological assessment.基于表现的替代种族规范在神经心理评估。
Cortex. 2022 Mar;148:231-238. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.12.003. Epub 2021 Dec 25.
8
Norms and equivalences for MoCA-30, MoCA-22, and MMSE in the oldest-old.认知筛查量表 30 项、22 项、简易精神状态检查在高龄老年人中的常模和等效性。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Dec;33(12):3303-3311. doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-01886-z. Epub 2021 May 29.
9
Perils of Race-Based Norms in Cognitive Testing: The Case of Former NFL Players.认知测试中基于种族的规范的风险:以前美国国家橄榄球联盟球员为例
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Apr 1;78(4):377-378. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4763.
10
Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.2020 年失明和视力障碍的原因及 30 多年来的趋势,以及与 VISION 2020:看见的权利相关的可避免盲的患病率:全球疾病负担研究的分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e144-e160. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7. Epub 2020 Dec 1.