Suppr超能文献

南加州大学阿尔茨海默病研究中心(USC ADRC)参与者的NACC电话神经心理测验组合(T-cog)和蒙特利尔认知评估的可靠性。

Reliability of the NACC Telephone-administered Neuropsychological Battery (T-cog) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment for participants in the USC ADRC.

作者信息

Howard Rebecca Sitra, Goldberg Terry E, Luo James, Munoz Cynthia, Schneider Lon S

机构信息

Keck School of Medicine of USC Los Angeles California USA.

Department of Psychiatry Columbia University Medical Center New York New York USA.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2023 Mar 8;15(1):e12406. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12406. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated remote administration of neuropsychological testing. We assessed the test-retest reliability for a telephone-administered cognitive battery, recommended for use in the National Institute on Aging Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC).

METHODS

64 participants in the University of Southern California ADRC clinical core underwent repeat telephone evaluation using the T-cog Neuropsychological Battery. Reliability was measured by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for continuous variables and weighted Kappa coefficient for categorical variables. Mean scores for Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) total and Craft Story 21 Immediate and Delayed Recall were compared using paired tests.

RESULTS

Mean age was 74.8 (8.3 standard deviation); 73.4% were female. ICCs ranged from 0.52 to 0.84, indicating moderate test-retest reliability except for number span backward, which showed poor reliability. Weighted Kappa for MoCA items ranged from -0.016 to 0.734; however, relatively good observed agreement was seen across all items (70.3% to 98.4%). Although MoCA total scores did not significantly change, Craft Story 21 Immediate and Delayed Recall mean scores increased between first and second administrations ( < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION

Test-retest reliability for the T-cog Neuropsychological Battery is adequate. The variation seen in testing is similar to results seen from face-to-face testing, with Craft Story 21 recall showing modest and expected practice effects.

HIGHLIGHTS

Moderate test-retest reliability is seen in most measures of the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Neuropsychological Test Battery and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.52 to 0.84, except for number Span backward.Weighted Kappa for MoCA items varied, but good observed agreement was seen.MoCA total mean score did not change significantly between administrations.Craft Story 21 Immediate and Delayed Recall means increased on repeat testing ( < 0.0001).

摘要

引言

新冠疫情期间的限制措施使得神经心理学测试需要采用远程方式进行。我们评估了一种通过电话进行的认知测试组合的重测信度,该测试组合被推荐用于美国国立衰老研究所阿尔茨海默病研究中心(ADRC)。

方法

南加州大学ADRC临床核心的64名参与者使用T-cog神经心理学测试组合接受了重复电话评估。连续变量的重测信度通过组内相关系数(ICC)测量,分类变量的重测信度通过加权Kappa系数测量。使用配对t检验比较蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)总分以及《Craft故事21》即时回忆和延迟回忆的平均得分。

结果

平均年龄为74.8岁(标准差8.3);73.4%为女性。ICC范围为0.52至0.84,表明除了倒序数字广度测试重测信度较差外,其他测试的重测信度中等。MoCA项目的加权Kappa系数范围为-0.016至0.734;然而,所有项目的观察一致性相对较好(70.3%至98.4%)。虽然MoCA总分没有显著变化,但《Craft故事21》即时回忆和延迟回忆的平均得分在首次和第二次测试之间有所增加(P<0.0001)。

讨论

T-cog神经心理学测试组合的重测信度足够。测试中观察到的变异性与面对面测试的结果相似,《Craft故事21》回忆表现出适度且预期的练习效应。

要点

在国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心神经心理学测试组合和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)的大多数测量中,重测信度中等。组内相关系数范围为0.52至0.84,倒序数字广度测试除外。MoCA项目的加权Kappa系数各不相同,但观察一致性良好。两次测试之间MoCA总平均分没有显著变化。重复测试时,《Craft故事21》即时回忆和延迟回忆的平均分增加(P<0.0001)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67f5/9994164/10e5e6b41092/DAD2-15-e12406-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验