• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与K-MoCA-30和K-MMSE相比,K-MoCA-22在筛查轻度认知障碍和痴呆方面的差异效度。

Differential Validity of K-MoCA-22 Compared to K-MoCA-30 and K-MMSE for Screening MCI and Dementia.

作者信息

Kim Haeyoon, Yu Kyung-Ho, Kang Yeonwook

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.

Department of Neurology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.

出版信息

Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2024 Oct;23(4):236-244. doi: 10.12779/dnd.2024.23.4.236. Epub 2024 Oct 29.

DOI:10.12779/dnd.2024.23.4.236
PMID:39512704
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11538852/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the Telephone-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) has gained popularity as a remote cognitive screening tool. T-MoCA includes items from the original MoCA (MoCA-30), excluding those requiring visual stimuli, resulting in a maximum score of 22 points. This study aimed to assess whether the T-MoCA items (MoCA-22) demonstrate comparable discriminatory power to MoCA-30 and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in screening for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia.

METHODS

Participants included 233 cognitively normal (CN) individuals, 175 with MCI, and 166 with dementia. All completed the Korean-MoCA-30 (K-MoCA-30) and Korean-MMSE (K-MMSE), with the Korean-MoCA-22 (K-MoCA-22) scores derived from the K-MoCA-30 responses. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

K-MoCA-22 showed a strong correlation with K-MoCA-30 and a moderate correlation with K-MMSE. Scores decreased progressively from CN to MCI and dementia, with significant differences between groups, consistent with K-MoCA-30 and K-MMSE. The study also explored modified K-MoCA-22 index scores across 5 cognitive domains. ROC curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) for K-MoCA-22 was significantly smaller than that for K-MoCA-30 in distinguishing both MCI and dementia from CN. However, no significant difference in AUC was found between K-MoCA-22 and K-MMSE, indicating similar discriminatory power. Additionally, the discriminability of K-MoCA-22 varied by education level.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that K-MoCA-22, although slightly less effective than K-MoCA-30, still shows good to excellent discriminatory power and is comparable to K-MMSE in screening for MCI and dementia.

摘要

背景与目的

自2019年冠状病毒病大流行开始以来,电话蒙特利尔认知评估量表(T-MoCA)作为一种远程认知筛查工具受到了广泛欢迎。T-MoCA包含原始蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA-30)中的项目,但不包括那些需要视觉刺激的项目,最高分为22分。本研究旨在评估T-MoCA项目(MoCA-22)在筛查轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆症时是否具有与MoCA-30及简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)相当的鉴别能力。

方法

参与者包括233名认知正常(CN)个体、175名患有MCI的个体以及166名患有痴呆症的个体。所有人都完成了韩国版MoCA-30(K-MoCA-30)和韩国版MMSE(K-MMSE),K-MoCA-22分数根据K-MoCA-30的回答得出。进行了受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析。

结果

K-MoCA-22与K-MoCA-30呈强相关,与K-MMSE呈中度相关。分数从CN到MCI和痴呆症逐渐降低,组间存在显著差异,这与K-MoCA-30和K-MMSE一致。该研究还探讨了5个认知领域的改良K-MoCA-22指数分数。ROC曲线分析显示,在区分MCI和痴呆症与CN方面,K-MoCA-22的曲线下面积(AUC)显著小于K-MoCA-30。然而,K-MoCA-22和K-MMSE之间的AUC没有显著差异,表明鉴别能力相似。此外,K-MoCA-22的鉴别能力因教育水平而异。

结论

这些结果表明,K-MoCA-22虽然比K-MoCA-30稍欠效力,但在筛查MCI和痴呆症时仍显示出良好至优异的鉴别能力,且与K-MMSE相当。

相似文献

1
Differential Validity of K-MoCA-22 Compared to K-MoCA-30 and K-MMSE for Screening MCI and Dementia.与K-MoCA-30和K-MMSE相比,K-MoCA-22在筛查轻度认知障碍和痴呆方面的差异效度。
Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2024 Oct;23(4):236-244. doi: 10.12779/dnd.2024.23.4.236. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
2
Effect of Education on Discriminability of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Compared to Mini-Mental State Examination.与简易精神状态检查表相比,教育对蒙特利尔认知评估可区分性的影响。
Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2023 Apr;22(2):69-77. doi: 10.12779/dnd.2023.22.2.69. Epub 2023 Apr 30.
3
Determining Appropriate Screening Tools and Cutoffs for Cognitive Impairment in the Chinese Elderly.确定中国老年人认知障碍的合适筛查工具及临界值。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 2;12:773281. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.773281. eCollection 2021.
4
The MMSE and MoCA for Screening Cognitive Impairment in Less Educated Patients with Parkinson's Disease.用于筛查受教育程度较低的帕金森病患者认知障碍的简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)
J Mov Disord. 2016 Sep;9(3):152-9. doi: 10.14802/jmd.16020. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
5
Relationship between the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-mental State Examination for assessment of mild cognitive impairment in older adults.蒙特利尔认知评估量表与简易精神状态检查表在评估老年人轻度认知障碍中的关系。
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Sep 7;15:107. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0103-3.
6
Validation Study of the Chinese Version of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III for Diagnosing Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia.中文版阿登布鲁克认知功能检查表第三版用于诊断轻度认知障碍和轻度痴呆的效度研究
J Clin Neurol. 2019 Jul;15(3):313-320. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2019.15.3.313.
7
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment is superior to the Mini-Mental State Examination in detecting patients at higher risk of dementia.蒙特利尔认知评估优于简易精神状态检查,可用于检测痴呆风险较高的患者。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Nov;24(11):1749-55. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212001068. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
8
Is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test better suited than the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) detection among people aged over 60? Meta-analysis.在60岁以上人群的轻度认知障碍(MCI)检测中,蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)测试是否比简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)更适用?荟萃分析。
Psychiatr Pol. 2016 Oct 31;50(5):1039-1052. doi: 10.12740/PP/45368.
9
Validity of the MoCA and MMSE in the detection of MCI and dementia in Parkinson disease.蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)和简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)在帕金森病中检测轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆的效度。
Neurology. 2009 Nov 24;73(21):1738-45. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c34b47.
10
Diagnostic utility of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination - III (ACE-III), Mini-ACE, Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Hasegawa Dementia Scale-Revised for detecting mild cognitive impairment and dementia.用于检测轻度认知障碍和痴呆的 Addenbrooke 认知测验-III(ACE-III)、Mini-ACE、简易精神状态检查、蒙特利尔认知评估和 Hasegawa 痴呆量表修订版的诊断效用。
Psychogeriatrics. 2020 Mar;20(2):156-162. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12480. Epub 2019 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Equivalence of Telephone-MoCA and MoCA-22 in Healthy Adults.评估健康成年人中电话版蒙特利尔认知评估量表(Telephone-MoCA)与简易精神状态检查表-22(MoCA-22)的等效性。
Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2025 Jul;24(3):187-197. doi: 10.12779/dnd.2025.24.3.187. Epub 2025 Jul 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Montreal Cognitive Assessment's auditory items (MoCA-22): Normative data and reliable change indices.蒙特利尔认知评估量表的听觉项目(MoCA-22):常模数据及可靠变化指数
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Aug 29:1-8. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2396380.
2
The Hong Kong version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment for the Visually Impaired (HKMoCA-VI): Proposed cut-off and cognitive functioning survey of visually impaired elderly in residential homes.香港版蒙特利尔认知评估量表之视障版(HKMoCA-VI):视障安老院舍院友的建议分界值及认知功能调查。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 26;19(6):e0305426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305426. eCollection 2024.
3
Online cognitive testing in Parkinson's disease: advantages and challenges.帕金森病的在线认知测试:优势与挑战
Front Neurol. 2024 Apr 8;15:1363513. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1363513. eCollection 2024.
4
A Community-Based Study of Dementia in Mexican American and Non-Hispanic White Individuals.基于社区的墨西哥裔美国人和非西班牙裔白人群体痴呆症研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;97(2):649-658. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230729.
5
Internet-Based Conversational Engagement Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial (I-CONECT) Among Socially Isolated Adults 75+ Years Old With Normal Cognition or Mild Cognitive Impairment: Topline Results.基于互联网的对话式参与随机对照临床试验(I-CONECT)在认知正常或轻度认知障碍的 75 岁以上社会隔离成年人中的应用:顶线结果。
Gerontologist. 2024 Apr 1;64(4). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad147.
6
MyCOACH (COnnected Advice for Cognitive Health): a digitally delivered multidomain intervention for cognitive decline and risk of dementia in adults with mild cognitive impairment or subjective cognitive decline-study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.我的 COACH(认知健康关联建议):一项数字化传递的多领域干预措施,用于治疗轻度认知障碍或主观认知衰退的成年人的认知能力下降和痴呆风险 - 一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 30;13(10):e075015. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075015.
7
Reliability and validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment's auditory items (MoCA-22).蒙特利尔认知评估量表听觉项目(MoCA-22)的信度和效度。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Apr;38(3):783-798. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2023.2261634. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
8
Effect of Education on Discriminability of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Compared to Mini-Mental State Examination.与简易精神状态检查表相比,教育对蒙特利尔认知评估可区分性的影响。
Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2023 Apr;22(2):69-77. doi: 10.12779/dnd.2023.22.2.69. Epub 2023 Apr 30.
9
A proposal for virtual, telephone-based preoperative cognitive assessment in older adults undergoing elective surgery.一项针对接受择期手术的老年人进行基于电话的虚拟术前认知评估的提议。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2022 Aug 18;11(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13741-022-00274-z.
10
Validation of T-MoCA in the Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Chinese Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.T-MoCA在中国房颤患者轻度认知障碍筛查中的有效性验证
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 22;9:896846. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.896846. eCollection 2022.