Maravilla K R, Lesh P, Weinreb J C, Selby D K, Mooney V
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1985 Mar-Apr;6(2):237-45.
The results of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) in 18 patients with known degenerative disk disease of the lumbar spine were compared. In 60 intervertebral disk levels studied, there were 17 disks with degeneration and disk bulge, and 15 herniated disks. Final diagnoses were based on several factors, with surgical confirmation in five patients. There was good correlation between the two methods at 51 of the 60 levels studied. However, there were major discrepancies in interpretation at nine intervertebral disk levels. These included three false-positive MR imaging interpretations of a herniated disk and one false-negative herniated disk on MR imaging. MR imaging detected one case of disk herniation that was missed prospectively on CT. There were also four presumed degenerated disks seen on MR scans that appeared normal on CT. The conus medullaris was imaged in 16 of 18 patients. The sagittal view proved best for demonstrating both disk abnormality and the conus medullaris. The transaxial view was sometimes helpful in localizing a disk herniation, but partial-volume averaging in the 7-mm slice thickness limited its usefulness. There were five disk herniations that could not be accurately localized on the MR scan. MR imaging proved more sensitive than CT in detecting early disk disease, which appeared as decreased signal intensity within the disk. In three postoperative cases, MR imaging was better able to distinguish between recurrent disk herniation and postoperative scar formation. CT, on the other hand, was more specific in distinguishing herniated disk from disk bulge and proved far superior to MR imaging in localizing disk herniation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对18例已知腰椎间盘退变疾病患者的磁共振成像(MR)和计算机断层扫描(CT)结果进行了比较。在研究的60个椎间盘节段中,有17个椎间盘存在退变和椎间盘膨出,15个椎间盘突出。最终诊断基于多种因素,5例患者经手术证实。在所研究的60个节段中的51个节段,两种方法之间具有良好的相关性。然而,在9个椎间盘节段的解读上存在重大差异。其中包括3例假阳性的MR成像对椎间盘突出的解读,以及1例假阴性的MR成像对椎间盘突出的漏诊。MR成像检测到1例CT前瞻性漏诊的椎间盘突出病例。在MR扫描上还发现有4个推测退变的椎间盘在CT上显示正常。18例患者中的16例对脊髓圆锥进行了成像。矢状面最有助于显示椎间盘异常和脊髓圆锥。横断面有时有助于定位椎间盘突出,但7毫米层厚的部分容积平均效应限制了其效用。有5个椎间盘突出在MR扫描上无法准确定位。MR成像在检测早期椎间盘疾病方面比CT更敏感,早期椎间盘疾病表现为椎间盘内信号强度降低。在3例术后病例中,MR成像更能区分复发性椎间盘突出和术后瘢痕形成。另一方面,CT在区分椎间盘突出和椎间盘膨出方面更具特异性,并且在定位椎间盘突出方面远优于MR成像。(摘要截短至250字)