Centro de Informação e Assistência Toxicológica de Campinas (CIATox-Campinas), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Rua Vital Brazil 80, Campinas, 13083-888, SP, Brazil; Departamento de Pediatria, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Rua Vital Brazil 80, Campinas, 13083-888, SP, Brazil.
Centro de Informação e Assistência Toxicológica de Campinas (CIATox-Campinas), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Rua Vital Brazil 80, Campinas, 13083-888, SP, Brazil.
Toxicon. 2024 Oct;249:108082. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2024.108082. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
Despite the wide range of institutions that maintain venomous snakes in captivity in Brazil there are no comprehensive data on the occurrence of snakebites and envenomations in these places. We examined the range of native and exotic species of venomous snakes kept by Brazilian zoos and serpentaria (scientific and commercial) and assessed the frequency of snakebites in workers handling these snakes during a 10-year period (2012-2021). Twenty-two (73.3%) of 30 institutions returned a standard questionnaire, including 15 serpentaria and 7 zoos that together kept 10,607 venomous snakes in 2022/2023. Commercial and scientific serpentaria had many more snakes (n = 10,550, consisting of 10,499 native specimens and 51 exotic specimens) than zoos (n = 57 native specimens), with two genera accounting for the majority of native species (Bothrops spp. = 84.5% and Crotalus durissus ssp. = 13.5%). Thirty-seven snakebites were reported and involved primarily the hands (33), seven of which occurred during venom extraction and 30 in other circumstances, most of them while handling/manipulating the cages or snake boxes (10) and restraining (9) or feeding (5) the snake. In addition, there were two cases of venom accidently sprayed on the face, including the eyes. Most bites were caused by Bothrops spp. (31), followed by C. durissus ssp. (4), Lachesis muta (1) and Micrurus corallinus (1). Thirty-three bites (89.2%) were treated with antivenom, with four bites to the fingers by Bothrops spp. resulting in local functional sequelae. There were 366,918 venom extractions with a ratio of 1.9 bites/100,000 extractions; no bites were recorded in the six institutions that sedated the snakes prior to venom extraction, which accounted for 22.7% of all extractions. These findings show that although snakebites are rare in Brazilian zoos and serpentaria, severe envenomation may occur. The occurrence of snakebites could be reduced by measures such as sedation of the snakes before venom extraction.
尽管巴西有许多机构在圈养有毒蛇,但对于这些地方发生的蛇伤和蛇毒中毒,目前尚无全面的数据。我们检查了巴西动物园和蛇药店(科学和商业)饲养的本地和外来毒蛇的种类范围,并评估了在 10 年期间(2012-2021 年)处理这些蛇的工人中蛇伤的频率。30 个机构中有 22 个(73.3%)返回了标准问卷,其中包括 15 个蛇药店和 7 个动物园,这些动物园和蛇药店在 2022/2023 年共饲养了 10,607 条毒蛇。商业和科学蛇药店的蛇数量要多得多(n=10,550 条,包括 10,499 条本地标本和 51 条外来标本),而动物园(n=57 条本地标本)的蛇要少得多,其中两个属占了大多数本地物种(Bothrops spp. =84.5%和 Crotalus durissus ssp. =13.5%)。报告了 37 例蛇伤,主要涉及手部(33 例),其中 7 例发生在毒液提取过程中,30 例发生在其他情况下,大多数发生在处理/操纵笼子或蛇箱(10 例)和限制(9 例)或喂食(5 例)蛇时。此外,还有两例毒液意外喷到脸上,包括眼睛。大多数咬伤是由 Bothrops spp.引起的(31 例),其次是 C. durissus ssp.(4 例)、Lachesis muta(1 例)和 Micrurus corallinus(1 例)。33 例咬伤(89.2%)用抗蛇毒血清治疗,有 4 例 Bothrops spp.咬伤手指,导致局部功能后遗症。进行了 366,918 次毒液提取,每 100,000 次提取中有 1.9 次咬伤;在进行毒液提取前对蛇进行镇静的 6 个机构中没有记录到咬伤,占所有提取的 22.7%。这些发现表明,尽管巴西动物园和蛇药店的蛇伤很少见,但可能会发生严重的蛇毒中毒。通过在毒液提取前对蛇进行镇静等措施,可以减少蛇伤的发生。