Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Institute and Fu Wai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, No. 167 North Lishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100037, China.
Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cardiovascular Institute and Fu Wai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, No. 167 North Lishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100037, China.
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;19(8):2185-2192. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03727-z. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
Observational studies revealed paradoxically inverse associations between diabetes and aortic diseases (aortic aneurysm or aortic dissection), yet the causality remains to be determined. To investigate the causal associations between diabetes and aortic diseases using Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. Summary-level data for exposures (type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, glycated hemoglobin) and outcomes (aortic dissection and aortic aneurysm) were obtained from public genome-wide association study data. The principal analysis was the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out, including weighted median, MR-Egger, and multivariable MR methods. According to IVW results, type 1 diabetes (odds ratio [OR]: 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.07; P = 0.87), type 2 diabetes (OR: 0.97; 95% CI 0.77-1.20; P = 0.75), fasting glucose (OR: 1.16; 95% CI 0.48-2.84; P = 0.74), fasting insulin (OR: 2.75; 95% CI 0.53-14.26; P = 0.23), or glycated hemoglobin (OR: 0.33; 95% CI 0.09-1.17; P = 0.09) had no causal effect on aortic dissection. Similarly, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, or glycated hemoglobin had no causal effect on aortic aneurysm. Sensitivity analyses revealed consistent results. MR-Egger method and funnel plot yielded no indication of directional pleiotropy. Diabetes had no causal associations with aortic dissection or aortic aneurysm. The observed inverse associations in previous cohort studies may be explained by confounding factors or reverse causation.
观察性研究表明,糖尿病与主动脉疾病(主动脉瘤或主动脉夹层)之间存在相反的关联,但因果关系仍有待确定。本研究旨在使用孟德尔随机化(MR)分析来研究糖尿病与主动脉疾病之间的因果关联。采用来自公开全基因组关联研究数据的暴露(1 型糖尿病、2 型糖尿病、空腹血糖、空腹胰岛素、糖化血红蛋白)和结局(主动脉夹层和主动脉瘤)的汇总水平数据。主要分析方法为逆方差加权(IVW)法。还进行了敏感性分析,包括加权中位数、MR-Egger 和多变量 MR 方法。根据 IVW 结果,1 型糖尿病(比值比 [OR]:0.99;95%置信区间 [CI]:0.93-1.07;P = 0.87)、2 型糖尿病(OR:0.97;95% CI:0.77-1.20;P = 0.75)、空腹血糖(OR:1.16;95% CI:0.48-2.84;P = 0.74)、空腹胰岛素(OR:2.75;95% CI:0.53-14.26;P = 0.23)或糖化血红蛋白(OR:0.33;95% CI:0.09-1.17;P = 0.09)对主动脉夹层均无因果影响。同样,1 型糖尿病、2 型糖尿病、空腹血糖、空腹胰岛素或糖化血红蛋白对主动脉瘤也无因果影响。敏感性分析结果一致。MR-Egger 法和漏斗图均未提示存在方向性偏倚。糖尿病与主动脉夹层或主动脉瘤之间不存在因果关系。先前的队列研究中观察到的相反关联可能是由混杂因素或反向因果关系所导致的。