The carbon footprint of external beam radiotherapy and its impact in health technology assessment.

BACKGROUND

The major drivers of carbon dioxide (COeq) emissions of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) are not well known and limit our ability to initiate mitigation strategies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We describe the carbon footprint of four typical centers. We explore direct EBRT associated factors such as the impact of fractionation and use of MRI-LINAC, as well as indirect factors (e.g. patient rides). Treatment strategy related COeq emissions are included in a health technology assessment analysis that takes into account COeq emissions.

RESULTS

A typical EBRT treatment emits from 185 kgCOeq to 2066 kgCOeq. COeq emissions are mostly driven by (i) accelerator acquisition and maintenance (37.8 %), (ii) patients and workers rides (32.7 %), (iii) drugs and medical devices (7.3 %), (iv) direct energy consumption (6.1 %), and (v) building and bunker construction (5.6 %) with a substantial heterogeneity among centers. Hypofractionation has a strong impact to mitigate emissions. MRI-LINAC is associated with a substantial increase in COeq emissions per fraction and requires ultra hypofractionation in 5 fractions to achieve a similar carbon footprint compared to 20 fractions treatment schemes. The expected limited small increase in toxicities due to hypofractionation (when existing) are in the same range as avoided detrimental effects to future people's health thanks to COeq mitigation.

CONCLUSION

Carbon footprint of EBRT is not neglectable and could be mitigated. When safely feasible, hypofractionation is one of the main factors to decrease this impact. Taking into account COeq emissions has a substantial impact on the health technology assessment of EBRT, favoring hypofractionated regimens.