• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating Quality of Cancer Care in Delaware using Commission on Cancer (CoC) Quality Measures, 2018-2019.使用癌症委员会(CoC)质量指标评估2018 - 2019年特拉华州的癌症护理质量
Dela J Public Health. 2024 Aug 28;10(3):8-11. doi: 10.32481/djph.2024.08.04. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Cancer Survivorship Care in the United States at Facilities Accredited by the Commission on Cancer.美国癌症委员会认证的医疗机构中的癌症生存护理。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2418736. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18736.
3
Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and -nonapproved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the National Cancer Data Base.美国癌症委员会批准与未批准医院的比较:对使用国家癌症数据库的研究的影响
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 1;27(25):4177-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7018. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
4
The Impact of Commission on Cancer Accreditation Status, Hospital Rurality and Hospital Size on Quality Measure Performance Rates.癌症委员会认证状态、医院所在地的农村性和医院规模对质量衡量指标绩效率的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Apr;29(4):2527-2536. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11304-3. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
5
Commission on Cancer (CoC) CP3R Measures for Colon Cancer Evaluation of Delaware Cancer Registry Data.癌症委员会(CoC)CP3R措施用于特拉华癌症登记数据的结肠癌评估。
Dela J Public Health. 2017 Jun 29;3(3):14-18. doi: 10.32481/djph.2017.06.005. eCollection 2017 Jun.
6
Contemporary Cancer Program Practice Profile Report (CP3R) Compliance Rates for Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis.当代癌症计划实践档案报告(CP3R)在乳腺癌方面的合规率:国家癌症数据库分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):8589-8599. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10028-8. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
7
National Evaluation of Hospital Performance on the New Commission on Cancer Melanoma Quality Measures.癌症委员会黑色素瘤质量指标下的医院绩效全国评估。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(11):3548-3557. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5302-4. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Renovating the Commission on Cancer's Quality Measure Portfolio.改造癌症委员会的质量衡量指标组合。
Ann Surg. 2024 Aug 1;280(2):193-198. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006281. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
10
Geographic distance to Commission on Cancer-accredited and nonaccredited hospitals in the United States.美国距离癌症委员会认证和未认证医院的地理距离。
J Rural Health. 2025 Jan;41(1):e12862. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12862. Epub 2024 Jul 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Commission on Cancer Accreditation on Cancer Survival: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database Analysis.癌症委员会认证对癌症生存的影响:监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr;31(4):2286-2294. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14709-4. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
2
Time to Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer Affects Survival: Implications for the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Quality Metrics.乳腺癌辅助放疗时间影响生存:对美国外科医师学会肿瘤委员会质量指标的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug;27(8):2614-2625. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08326-8. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
3
Compliance with Cancer Quality Measures Over Time and Their Association with Survival Outcomes: The Commission on Cancer's Experience with the Quality Measure Requiring at Least 12 Regional Lymph Nodes to be Removed and Analyzed with Colon Cancer Resections.随着时间的推移,对癌症质量指标的遵守情况及其与生存结果的关联:肿瘤委员会在结肠癌切除术中至少切除和分析 12 个区域淋巴结的质量指标方面的经验。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(6):1613-1621. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07323-w. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
4
CP3R: An Important Tool.
J Registry Manag. 2016 Summer;43(2):94-5.

使用癌症委员会(CoC)质量指标评估2018 - 2019年特拉华州的癌症护理质量

Evaluating Quality of Cancer Care in Delaware using Commission on Cancer (CoC) Quality Measures, 2018-2019.

作者信息

Ross Wilhelmina, Ng Diane, Little Hayley, Nagarajan Sumitha, Robinson-Wilkerson Paulette, Hollinger Dawn

机构信息

Delaware Cancer Registry Director, Westat.

Research Associate, Westat.

出版信息

Dela J Public Health. 2024 Aug 28;10(3):8-11. doi: 10.32481/djph.2024.08.04. eCollection 2024 Aug.

DOI:10.32481/djph.2024.08.04
PMID:39211404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11356582/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) quality measures are used to monitor and evaluate metrics among their CoC-accredited programs, which include seven of Delaware's hospitals. The Delaware Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Public Health (DPH) also utilizes these metrics to monitor and evaluate Delaware's overall performance on these standards of care as it relates to the health care provided to cancer patients.

METHODS

Delaware Cancer Registry (DCR) cases diagnosed in 2018 and 2019 were selected and were analyzed separately to calculate results for each selected measure by year: HT, nBX, LNoSurg, and RECRTCT.

RESULTS

Results of the analysis showed that three out of the four CoC quality measures evaluated met the CoC standard of care for both 2018 and 2019 data. The three measures that met the CoC standards for 2018 were HT (90.4%), nBX (87.6%), and LNoSurg (93.3%). The RECRTCT measure did not meet the CoC standard for 2018 data with 71.4%. All four measures evaluated met the CoC standards for 2019 (HT - 91.6%; nBX - 85.2%; LNoSurg - 92.7%; RECRTCT - 92.3%).

DISCUSSION

A majority of cases assessed met the CoC quality measure standards, meeting standards of cancer care and treatment. More discovery work needs to be done to assess the RECRTCT metric to explore reasons why cases did not meet the CoC quality measure standards. There was notable improvement seen for the HT measure over time, where cases had not met the CoC standard in previous years.

PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATIONS

When CoC quality measures are met, medical providers can ensure patients receive effective and targeted cancer care. This practice ultimately saves resources, reduces cancer burden, impacts survival, and improves public health outcomes.

摘要

引言

美国外科医师学会癌症委员会(CoC)的质量指标用于监测和评估其CoC认证项目中的各项指标,其中包括特拉华州的七家医院。特拉华州卫生与社会服务部公共卫生司(DPH)也利用这些指标来监测和评估特拉华州在这些护理标准方面的整体表现,这些标准与为癌症患者提供的医疗服务相关。

方法

选取2018年和2019年诊断的特拉华癌症登记处(DCR)病例,并分别进行分析,以计算每年每项选定指标的结果:HT、nBX、LNoSurg和RECRTCT。

结果

分析结果显示,在评估的四项CoC质量指标中,有三项在2018年和2019年的数据中均达到了CoC护理标准。2018年达到CoC标准的三项指标分别为HT(90.4%)、nBX(87.6%)和LNoSurg(93.3%)。RECRTCT指标在2018年的数据中未达到CoC标准,为71.4%。所有四项评估指标在2019年都达到了CoC标准(HT - 91.6%;nBX - 85.2%;LNoSurg - 92.7%;RECRTCT - 92.3%)。

讨论

大多数评估病例达到了CoC质量指标标准,符合癌症护理和治疗标准。需要做更多的探索工作来评估RECRTCT指标,以探究病例未达到CoC质量指标标准的原因。随着时间的推移,HT指标有显著改善,此前几年病例未达到CoC标准。

对公共卫生的影响

当达到CoC质量指标时,医疗服务提供者可以确保患者接受有效且有针对性的癌症护理。这种做法最终节省了资源,减轻了癌症负担,影响了生存率,并改善了公共卫生结果。