Department of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka.
Post Graduate Institute of Indigenous Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
F1000Res. 2024 Mar 11;13:171. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.144221.1. eCollection 2024.
Health policies form the foundation for provisioning best level care and are important for all stakeholders including patients and healthcare providers. Health policy analysis and evaluation allows policy makers to improve an existing policy, terminate a non-effective policy and to successfully implement future policies.The objective was to assess the coherence between the two local policy documents on NCD prevention and control in Sri Lanka, the national NCD policy (NCD policy) and the multisectoral action plan (MSAP), and to assess the consistency of MSAP with the global action plan for NCDs.
The content analysis of the NCD policy and MSAP of Sri Lanka was conducted based on the modified criteria developed to the 'Analysis of determinants of policy impact' model, by two reviewers independently. Coherence between MSAP and the global NCD action plan were also assessed by two reviewers independently. Consensus for discrepancy was achieved through discussion.
Accessibility was the strongest criteria for the NCD policy, while, resources and obligations were the weakest. Goals and monitoring and evaluation criteria were the strongest in the MSAP. Requirement for improvement were identified in policy background, goals, monitoring and evaluation, and public opportunities for the NCD policy. Accessibility, policy background, resources, public opportunities and obligations require further improvement in the MSAP. The MSAP is well coherent with the global road map for NCD prevention and control.
Policy documents related to NCD prevention and control in Sri Lanka are coherent with the global action plan, while, there are areas within the local policy documents that need to be improved to enhance the coherence between the local documents. Lessons learnt by this activity need to be utilized by Sri Lanka and other countries to improve the uniformity between the NCD policy documents within the country as well as internationally.
卫生政策为提供最佳水平的医疗服务奠定了基础,对包括患者和医疗保健提供者在内的所有利益相关者都很重要。卫生政策分析和评估使决策者能够改进现有政策、终止无效政策并成功实施未来政策。目的是评估斯里兰卡两份关于非传染性疾病预防和控制的地方政策文件,即国家非传染性疾病政策(NCD 政策)和多部门行动计划(MSAP)之间的一致性,并评估 MSAP 与全球非传染性疾病行动计划的一致性。
采用两位评审员根据修改后的标准,对《政策影响分析的决定因素》模型对 NCD 政策和斯里兰卡 MSAP 进行内容分析。两位评审员还对 MSAP 与全球非传染性疾病行动计划的一致性进行了独立评估。通过讨论达成了对差异的共识。
可及性是非传染性疾病政策最强的标准,而资源和义务是非传染性疾病政策最薄弱的标准。MSAP 的目标和监测与评估标准最强。NCD 政策需要改进的地方包括政策背景、目标、监测和评估以及公众机会。MSAP 在可及性、政策背景、资源、公众机会和义务方面需要进一步改进。MSAP 与全球非传染性疾病预防和控制路线图高度一致。
斯里兰卡与非传染性疾病预防和控制相关的政策文件与全球行动计划一致,但地方政策文件中仍有需要改进的地方,以增强地方文件之间的一致性。斯里兰卡和其他国家需要利用这一活动的经验教训,提高国家内部以及国际上非传染性疾病政策文件的一致性。