• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Fiscal policies and regulations for healthy diets in Sri Lanka: an analysis of the political economy of taxation and traffic light labelling for sugar-sweetened beverages.斯里兰卡健康饮食的财政政策和法规:对含糖饮料征税和使用红绿灯标签的政治经济学分析。
Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2280339. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2280339. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
2
Nutrition related non-communicable diseases and sugar sweetened beverage policies: a landscape analysis in Zambia.营养相关非传染性疾病与含糖饮料政策:赞比亚的现状分析。
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1872172. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1872172.
3
Barriers to, and facilitators of, the adoption of a sugar sweetened beverage tax to prevent non-communicable diseases in Uganda: a policy landscape analysis.在乌干达,采用含糖饮料税来预防非传染性疾病的障碍和促进因素:政策分析。
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1892307. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1892307.
4
Barriers to, and facilitators of, the adoption of a sugar sweetened beverage tax to prevent non-communicable diseases in Namibia: a policy landscape analysis.纳米比亚采用含糖饮料税预防非传染性疾病的障碍和促进因素:政策分析。
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1903213. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1903213.
5
Generating Political Commitment for Regulatory Interventions Targeting Dietary Harms and Poor Nutrition: A Case Study on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxation in Australia.为针对饮食危害和营养贫困的监管干预措施调动政治承诺:以澳大利亚含糖饮料征税为例。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2489-2501. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.174. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
6
Strengthening prevention of nutrition-related non-communicable diseases through sugar-sweetened beverages tax in Rwanda: a policy landscape analysis.通过在卢旺达对含糖饮料征税来加强营养相关非传染性疾病的预防:政策分析。
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1883911. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1883911.
7
The political economy of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation: an analysis from seven countries in sub-Saharan Africa.含糖饮料征税的政治经济学:撒哈拉以南非洲七个国家的分析。
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1909267. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1909267.
8
The political economy of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in Latin America: lessons from Mexico, Chile and Colombia.拉丁美洲含糖饮料征税的政治经济学:来自墨西哥、智利和哥伦比亚的经验教训。
Global Health. 2021 Jan 5;17(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00656-2.
9
A sweet deal for domestic industry: the political economy and framing of Vanuatu's sugar-sweetened beverage tax.为国内产业带来的甜蜜交易:瓦努阿图含糖饮料税的政治经济与框架。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(Suppl 8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012025.
10
Study design: policy landscape analysis for sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in seven sub-Saharan African countries.研究设计:对撒哈拉以南非洲七个国家征收含糖饮料税的政策分析。
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1856469. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1856469.

引用本文的文献

1
Strengthening legal measures to support access to nutritious foods and healthy food environments for adolescent girls in South Asia.加强法律措施,以支持南亚少女获取营养食品和健康的食物环境。
BMJ. 2025 Mar 3;388:e080361. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080361.

本文引用的文献

1
Free sugar intake and associated factors among Sri Lankan preschool children.斯里兰卡学龄前儿童的游离糖摄入量及其相关因素。
BMC Nutr. 2022 Nov 21;8(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s40795-022-00638-0.
2
Corporate political activity in the context of sugar-sweetened beverage tax policy in the WHO European Region.企业在世界卫生组织欧洲区域含糖饮料税收政策方面的政治活动。
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Oct 3;32(5):786-793. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac117.
3
Evaluation of Economic and Health Outcomes Associated With Food Taxes and Subsidies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估与食品税和补贴相关的经济和健康结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2214371. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14371.
4
Advances in Gender-Transformative Approaches to Health Promotion.促进健康的性别转换方法的进展。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:1-17. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-121019-053834.
5
Sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in Europe: learning for the future.欧洲的含糖饮料税:为未来而学习。
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Apr 1;32(2):273-280. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab211.
6
Missed Opportunities: The Need to Promote Public Knowledge and Awareness of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes.错失的机会:需要提高公众对含糖饮料征税的认识和了解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 27;18(9):4607. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094607.
7
Study design: policy landscape analysis for sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in seven sub-Saharan African countries.研究设计:对撒哈拉以南非洲七个国家征收含糖饮料税的政策分析。
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1856469. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1856469.
8
Hollow Threats: Transnational Food and Beverage Companies' Use of International Agreements to Fight Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labeling in Mexico and Beyond.空心威胁:跨国食品和饮料公司利用国际协议在墨西哥及其他地区抵制营养标签前置
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Jun 1;11(6):722-725. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.146.
9
Effectiveness of interpretive front-of-pack nutritional labelling schemes on the promotion of healthier food choices: a systematic review.解读型营养标签在促进更健康食品选择方面的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2020 Mar;18(1):24-37. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000214.
10
Political Economy of Non-Communicable Diseases: From Unconventional to Essential.非传染性疾病的政治经济学:从非常规到必不可少
Health Syst Reform. 2019;5(3):250-256. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2019.1609872. Epub 2019 Aug 26.

斯里兰卡健康饮食的财政政策和法规:对含糖饮料征税和使用红绿灯标签的政治经济学分析。

Fiscal policies and regulations for healthy diets in Sri Lanka: an analysis of the political economy of taxation and traffic light labelling for sugar-sweetened beverages.

机构信息

Health, Education & Labour Department, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2280339. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2280339. Epub 2023 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1080/16549716.2023.2280339
PMID:38018465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10795608/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unhealthy dietary patterns significantly contribute to rising non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Sri Lanka. The government has implemented policy measures to promote healthy dietary patterns, including the traffic light labelling (TLL) system for sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in 2016 and taxation on SSBs in 2017.

OBJECTIVES

To analyse how ideas, institutions, and power dynamics influence the formulation and implementation of these two interventions, and to identify strategies for public health actors to advocate for more effective food environment policies in Sri Lanka.

METHODS

This study drew on Kingdon's theory of agenda-setting and Campbell's institutionalist approach to develop the theoretical framework. We examined the political economy at the policy development and implementation stages, adopting a deductive framework approach for data collection and analysis. Data were collected from documents and key informants.

RESULTS

NCDs and nutrition are recognised and framed as important policy issues in health-sector policy documents, and the SSB tax and TLL system are seen as means of improving diets and health. Sri Lanka's commitment to addressing NCDs and nutrition-related issues is evident through these policies. The Ministry of Health led policy development, and key stakeholders were involved. However, there are opportunities to learn and strengthen policy in Sri Lanka and elsewhere. Limited involvement and commitment of some stakeholders in developing national policies, industry interferences, and other gaps resulted in weaker policy design. Gender considerations were also given minimal attention in policy formulation and implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

To enhance the effectiveness of the policies and regulations to promote healthy diets in Sri Lanka, comprehensive policy coverage, multistakeholder involvement and commitment to national policies, balanced power dynamics, technical feasibility, government commitment backed with high-level political support, awareness, and knowledge creation, managing industry interferences, integrating gender considerations are crucial factors.

摘要

背景

不健康的饮食模式是导致斯里兰卡非传染性疾病(NCDs)不断上升的主要原因。政府已经采取了政策措施来促进健康的饮食模式,包括 2016 年推出的含糖饮料(SSB)红绿灯标签(TLL)系统和 2017 年对 SSB 征税。

目的

分析思想、制度和权力动态如何影响这两项干预措施的制定和实施,并确定公共卫生行为者在斯里兰卡倡导更有效的食品环境政策的策略。

方法

本研究借鉴了 Kingdon 的议程设置理论和 Campbell 的制度主义方法来制定理论框架。我们在政策制定和实施阶段考察了政治经济,采用了演绎框架方法进行数据收集和分析。数据来自文件和主要知情人。

结果

非传染性疾病和营养在卫生部门政策文件中被认为是重要的政策问题,SSB 税和 TLL 系统被视为改善饮食和健康的手段。斯里兰卡通过这些政策表明了其致力于解决非传染性疾病和与营养相关问题的承诺。卫生部主导了政策制定,关键利益相关者也参与其中。然而,斯里兰卡和其他地方有机会学习和加强政策。一些利益相关者在制定国家政策方面的参与度和承诺有限、行业干扰以及其他差距导致政策设计较弱。在政策制定和实施中,性别问题也没有得到足够的关注。

结论

为了提高斯里兰卡促进健康饮食政策和法规的有效性,全面的政策覆盖、多利益攸关方的参与和对国家政策的承诺、平衡的权力动态、技术可行性、政府支持和高级别政治支持、提高认识和知识创造、管理行业干扰以及纳入性别考虑因素是至关重要的因素。