Suppr超能文献

儿科急诊科就诊中自杀意念和行为的ICD - 10编码准确性

Accuracy of ICD-10 codes for suicidal ideation and action in pediatric emergency department encounters.

作者信息

Xu Rena, Bode Louisa, Geva Alon, Mandl Kenneth D, McMurry Andrew J

出版信息

medRxiv. 2024 Jul 24:2024.07.23.24310777. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.23.24310777.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

According to the ideation-to-action framework of suicidality, suicidal ideation and suicidal action arise via distinct trajectories. Studying suicidality under this framework requires accurate identification of both ideation and action. We sought to assess the accuracy of ICD-10 codes for suicidal ideation and action in emergency department (ED) encounters.

METHODS

Accuracy of ICD-10 coding for suicidality was assessed through chart review of clinical notes for 205 ED encounters among patients 6-18 years old at a large academic pediatric hospital between June 1, 2016, and June 1, 2022. Physician notes were reviewed for documentation of past or present suicidal ideation, suicidal action, or both. The study cohort consisted of 103 randomly selected "cases," or encounters assigned at least one ICD-10 code for suicidality, and 102 propensity-matched "non-cases" lacking ICD-10 codes. Accuracy of ICD-10 codes was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

RESULTS

Against a gold standard chart review, the PPV for ICD-10 suicidality codes was 86.9%, and the NPV was 76.2%. Nearly half of encounters involving suicidality were not captured by ICD-10 coding (sensitivity=53.4%). Sensitivity was higher for ideation-present (82.4%) than for action-present (33.7%) or action-past (20.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Many cases of suicidality may be missed by relying on only ICD-10 codes. Accuracy of ICD-10 codes is high for suicidal ideation but low for action. To scale the ideation-to-action model for use in large populations, better data sources are needed to identify cases of suicidal action.

摘要

目的

根据自杀行为的构思到行动框架,自杀意念和自杀行为通过不同轨迹产生。在此框架下研究自杀行为需要准确识别意念和行为。我们试图评估急诊科(ED)就诊时国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)编码对自杀意念和行为的准确性。

方法

通过查阅一家大型学术儿科医院在2016年6月1日至2022年6月1日期间6至18岁患者205次ED就诊的临床记录来评估ICD - 10编码对自杀行为的准确性。查阅医生记录以确定过去或当前自杀意念、自杀行为或两者的记录情况。研究队列包括103个随机选择的“病例”,即至少被分配一个ICD - 10自杀行为编码的就诊病例,以及102个倾向匹配的“非病例”,即未被分配ICD - 10编码的病例。使用灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)评估ICD - 10编码的准确性。

结果

与金标准图表审查相比,ICD - 10自杀行为编码的PPV为86.9%,NPV为76.2%。近一半涉及自杀行为的就诊病例未被ICD - 10编码捕获(灵敏度 = 53.4%)。存在意念时的灵敏度(82.4%)高于存在行为时(33.7%)或过去有行为时(20.4%)。

结论

仅依靠ICD - 10编码可能会遗漏许多自杀行为病例。ICD - 10编码对自杀意念的准确性较高,但对行为的准确性较低。为了将构思到行动模型应用于大量人群,需要更好的数据来源来识别自杀行为病例。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验