May Lindsay J, Stehlik Josef, Wilkes Jacob, Ou Zhining, Pinto Nelangi M, Cabrera Antonio G, Tristani-Firouzi Martin, Keenan Heather T
University of Utah.
University of Utah School of Medicine.
Res Sq. 2024 Oct 15:rs.3.rs-4941771. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4941771/v1.
Most epidemiological studies in pediatric heart failure (HF) use administrative database sources, defining patient cohorts by presence of a single HF ICD code. However, the ability of ICD codes to identify true HF patients is unknown in pediatrics. Here we describe the accuracy of HF ICD-10-CM code search algorithms, in identifying pediatric patients with HF from electronic data sources.
Based on the adult HF literature, search algorithms were designed to incorporate HF ICD codes, imaging, and medications. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and accuracy of the algorithms were tested among children in an advanced HF clinic ("Clinic cohort"). Top-performing algorithms were then tested in a large-scale regional electronic data warehouse (EDW), 01/2017 to 01/2020, generating the "EDW Cohort". False positive cases were identified and characterized by chart review.
Within the Clinic Cohort, 78/378 patients (21%) had gold standard HF diagnoses. A search algorithm with one HF ICD coded visit was more sensitive but less specific than >1 HF ICD coded visit, (sensitivity 94% and specificity 89% versus 69% and 97%, respectively). Correspondingly, >1 ICD coded visit had a higher PPV than one ICD coded visit; 84% vs. 69%. Accuracy was similar (90% vs 91%). Presence of 1 HF ICD code combined with HF medication had high sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy, all higher than the single ICD code algorithm. The "1 HF coded visit + any medication" algorithm resulted in highest accuracy (93%). Top-performing algorithms were tested in the EDW: the algorithm with > 1 HF ICD coded visit, and the algorithm with one HF ICD coded visit combined with HF medication. In the EDW Cohort, 133/248 (53.6%) patients had gold standard HF diagnoses though 115/248 (46.3%) were false positive cases; 41% of those had pulmonary over-circulation from congenital heart disease. Excluding children < 30 days old and those with a history of an isolated VSD repair, complete AVSD repair, or PDA closure further reduced the proportion of false positives to 50/248 (20%).
A search algorithm using a single HF ICD code can have acceptable sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy in identifying children with HF from within electronic medical records. Similar to adult HF literature, specificity improves by including HF medication. When applied to large data sources, however, the search algorithms result in a high proportion of patients with pulmonary overcirculation related to congenital heart disease. To narrow the population to those with myocardial dysfunction, case identification may require use of ICD codes with linked of administrative, surgical, and/or imaging databases.
大多数儿科心力衰竭(HF)的流行病学研究使用行政数据库来源,通过单一HF ICD编码来定义患者队列。然而,ICD编码识别儿科真正HF患者的能力尚不清楚。在此,我们描述了HF ICD - 10 - CM编码搜索算法从电子数据源中识别儿科HF患者的准确性。
基于成人HF文献,设计搜索算法以纳入HF ICD编码、影像学和药物治疗信息。在一家高级HF诊所的儿童中(“诊所队列”)测试算法的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及准确性。然后在一个大规模区域电子数据仓库(EDW,2017年1月至2020年1月)中测试表现最佳的算法,生成“EDW队列”。通过病历审查识别并描述假阳性病例。
在诊所队列中,78/378名患者(21%)有金标准HF诊断。一次HF ICD编码就诊的搜索算法比多次HF ICD编码就诊的算法更敏感但特异性更低(敏感性分别为94%和89%,而多次HF ICD编码就诊算法的敏感性为69%,特异性为97%)。相应地,多次ICD编码就诊算法的阳性预测值高于一次ICD编码就诊算法;分别为84%和69%。准确性相似(90%和91%)。一个HF ICD编码与HF药物治疗相结合具有高敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性,均高于单一ICD编码算法。“一次HF编码就诊 + 任何药物治疗”算法的准确性最高(93%)。在EDW中测试表现最佳的算法:多次HF ICD编码就诊算法,以及一次HF ICD编码就诊与HF药物治疗相结合的算法。在EDW队列中,133/248名患者(53.6%)有金标准HF诊断,尽管115/248名患者(46.