• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲氧氟烷用于儿童和青少年紧急止痛的安全性:一项回顾性队列研究。

The Safety of Methoxyflurane for Emergency Pain Relief in Children and Adolescents: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Kelty Erin A, Murray Kevin, Sanfilippo Frank M, Preen David B

机构信息

School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2025;29(6):768-775. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2397519. Epub 2024 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1080/10903127.2024.2397519
PMID:39212349
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The use of methoxyflurane is becoming increasingly popular in the treatment of pain in an emergency setting, in part due to its ease of administration. However, little is known about the risk of serious adverse events in children and adolescents. The aim of this study was to examine the safety of methoxyflurane in a pediatric population.

METHODS

The study was a retrospective cohort study of pediatric prehospital events using probabilistic linked health data. All ambulance transfers in Western Australia between 1990 and 2016 involving children and adolescent patients were identified. Patients were categorized based on administered analgesia: methoxyflurane, an opioid analgesic, both methoxyflurane and an opioid analgesic, or no analgesic. Hospital and mortality data were linked to transferred patients to identify deaths, adverse drug reactions, liver and kidney toxicity, and re-admissions to hospital following ambulance transfer. Generalized linear models, adjusting for sociodemographic and ambulance transfer characteristics, were used to compare outcomes between children exposed to methoxyflurane and the other three groups.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 37,211 children, including 9,472 patients (25.5%) treated with methoxyflurane alone, 2,764 (7.4%) treated with an opioid analgesic, 1,235 (3.3%) treated with both methoxyflurane and an opioid analgesic, and 23,740 (63.8%) treated with no analgesic. Death in children and adolescents was uncommon, with less than five deaths (<0.1%) observed in the 12 months following treatment with methoxyflurane and no deaths in those treated with both methoxyflurane and an opioid analgesic. Adverse drug reaction was rare (<0.1%) in patients treated with methoxyflurane, as was liver and kidney toxicity with no case observed. At 90-days follow-up, there was no significant difference in hospitalization in patients treated with methoxyflurane and those treated with methoxyflurane and an opioid analgesic (adjusted OR:1.01, 95%CI:0.85-1.21). Compared with methoxyflurane treated patients, patients treated with an opioid analgesic were more likely to be hospitalized (aOR:1.23, 95%CI:1.09-1.39), while patients treated with no analgesic were less likely to be hospitalized (aOR:0.85, 95%CI:0.79-0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

In children and adolescents transported by ambulance, the use of methoxyflurane was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization, death, serious adverse drug reactions or liver and kidney toxicity.

摘要

目的

甲氧氟烷在紧急情况下治疗疼痛中的应用越来越普遍,部分原因是其易于给药。然而,对于儿童和青少年发生严重不良事件的风险知之甚少。本研究的目的是探讨甲氧氟烷在儿科人群中的安全性。

方法

本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,利用概率关联健康数据对儿科院前事件进行研究。确定了1990年至2016年西澳大利亚州所有涉及儿童和青少年患者的救护车转运情况。根据给予的镇痛药物对患者进行分类:甲氧氟烷、阿片类镇痛药、甲氧氟烷和阿片类镇痛药两者或未给予镇痛药物。将医院和死亡率数据与转运患者相关联,以确定死亡、药物不良反应、肝肾毒性以及救护车转运后再次入院情况。使用广义线性模型,并对社会人口统计学和救护车转运特征进行调整,以比较暴露于甲氧氟烷的儿童与其他三组儿童的结局。

结果

研究队列包括37211名儿童,其中9472例(25.5%)仅接受甲氧氟烷治疗,2764例(7.4%)接受阿片类镇痛药治疗,1235例(3.3%)同时接受甲氧氟烷和阿片类镇痛药治疗,23740例(63.8%)未接受镇痛药物治疗。儿童和青少年死亡情况并不常见,在接受甲氧氟烷治疗后的12个月内观察到不到5例死亡(<0.1%),同时接受甲氧氟烷和阿片类镇痛药治疗的患者无死亡病例。接受甲氧氟烷治疗的患者药物不良反应罕见(<0.1%),肝肾毒性也未观察到病例。在90天随访时,接受甲氧氟烷治疗的患者与接受甲氧氟烷和阿片类镇痛药治疗的患者在住院方面无显著差异(调整后的比值比:1.01,95%置信区间:0.85-1.21)。与接受甲氧氟烷治疗的患者相比,接受阿片类镇痛药治疗的患者更有可能住院(校正后的比值比:1.23,95%置信区间:1.09-1.39),而未接受镇痛药物治疗的患者住院可能性较小(校正后的比值比:0.85,95%置信区间:0.79-0.92)。

结论

在通过救护车转运的儿童和青少年中,使用甲氧氟烷与住院、死亡、严重药物不良反应或肝肾毒性风险增加无关。

相似文献

1
The Safety of Methoxyflurane for Emergency Pain Relief in Children and Adolescents: A Retrospective Cohort Study.甲氧氟烷用于儿童和青少年紧急止痛的安全性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2025;29(6):768-775. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2397519. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
2
Inhaled methoxyflurane as a prehospital analgesic in children.吸入用甲氧氟烷作为儿童院前镇痛剂
Emerg Med Australas. 2006 Aug;18(4):404-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2006.00874.x.
3
Prehospital analgesia in New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州的院前镇痛。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011 Dec;26(6):422-6. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X12000180.
4
The effectiveness and safety of paediatric prehospital pain management: a systematic review.儿科院前疼痛管理的有效性和安全性:系统评价。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Dec 11;29(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00974-3.
5
Real world safety of methoxyflurane analgesia in the emergency setting: a comparative hybrid prospective-retrospective post-authorisation safety study.在急诊环境下使用甲氧氟烷进行镇痛的真实世界安全性:一项比较性混合前瞻性-回顾性上市后安全性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Aug 30;23(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00862-2.
6
Inhaled Methoxyflurane Provides Greater Analgesia and Faster Onset of Action Versus Standard Analgesia in Patients With Trauma Pain: InMEDIATE: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Emergency Departments.吸入甲氧氟烷相较于标准镇痛在创伤疼痛患者中提供更强的镇痛效果和更快的起效时间:INMEDIATE:急诊科的一项随机对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Mar;75(3):315-328. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.07.028. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
7
Comparison of inhalational methoxyflurane, intranasal fentanyl, and intravenous morphine for treatment of prehospital acute pain in Norway (PreMeFen): a randomised, non-inferiority, three-arm, phase 3 trial.
Lancet. 2026 Dec 20;406(10522):2957-2967. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01575-2. Epub 2025 Nov 20.
8
Analgesic Efficacy, Practicality and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Analgesic Treatment for Acute Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Randomised, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicentre Trial in Italy (MEDITA).吸入甲氧氟烷对急诊急性创伤疼痛的镇痛效果、实用性和安全性与标准镇痛治疗的比较:意大利一项随机、开放标签、阳性对照、多中心试验(MEDITA)。
Adv Ther. 2019 Nov;36(11):3030-3046. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01055-9. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
9
Methoxyflurane Versus Standard of Care for Acute Trauma-Related Pain in the Emergency Setting: Protocol for a Randomised, Controlled Study in Italy (MEDITA).甲氧基氟烷与常规护理治疗急诊创伤相关疼痛的比较:意大利一项随机对照研究方案(MEDITA)。
Adv Ther. 2019 Jan;36(1):244-256. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0830-x. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
10
A pilot study of inhaled methoxyflurane for procedural analgesia in children.一项关于吸入甲氧氟烷用于儿童程序性镇痛的初步研究。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Feb;17(2):148-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02037.x.