• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲氧基氟烷与常规护理治疗急诊创伤相关疼痛的比较:意大利一项随机对照研究方案(MEDITA)。

Methoxyflurane Versus Standard of Care for Acute Trauma-Related Pain in the Emergency Setting: Protocol for a Randomised, Controlled Study in Italy (MEDITA).

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Vittorio Emanuele University Hospital, Catania, Italy.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2019 Jan;36(1):244-256. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0830-x. Epub 2018 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1007/s12325-018-0830-x
PMID:30467809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6318254/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Low-dose methoxyflurane, administered via a hand-held inhaler, has been used for short-term pain relief in emergency medicine in Australia and New Zealand for over 40 years, and was recently approved in Europe for the rapid relief of moderate-to-severe trauma-related pain in adults. There is currently a lack of data for methoxyflurane versus active comparators, therefore this trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of inhaled methoxyflurane compared with standard of care (SoC) in the treatment of acute trauma-related pain in pre-hospital and ED settings in Italy.

METHODS

MEDITA (Methoxyflurane in Emergency Department in ITAly) is a Phase IIIb, prospective, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre trial. A total of 272 adult patients with moderate-to-severe pain [score ≥ 4 on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)] due to limb trauma will be randomised 1:1 to receive 3 mL methoxyflurane (self-administered by the patient via inhalation under supervision of a trained person) or medications that currently comprise the SoC in Italy [intravenous (IV) morphine for severe pain (NRS ≥ 7); IV paracetamol or ketoprofen for moderate pain (NRS 4-6)], administered as soon as possible after randomisation.

PLANNED OUTCOMES

Pain intensity will be measured using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) at baseline (time of randomisation) and at intervals up to 30 min. Time of onset of pain relief as reported by the patient and use of rescue medication will be recorded. The patient will rate the efficacy and the healthcare professional will rate the practicality of study treatment at 30 min after randomisation using a 5-point Likert scale. Adverse events will be recorded until safety follow-up at 14 ± 2 days. Vital signs will be measured at baseline, 10 and 30 min. The primary aim is to demonstrate non-inferiority of methoxyflurane versus SoC for the change in VAS pain intensity from baseline (randomisation) to 3, 5 and 10 min.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT number: 2017-001565-25. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03585374.

FUNDING

Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals srl.

摘要

简介

在澳大利亚和新西兰,低剂量甲氧氟烷通过手动吸入器给药已用于急诊医学中的短期止痛已有 40 多年,最近在欧洲被批准用于成人快速缓解中度至重度创伤相关疼痛。目前缺乏甲氧氟烷与活性对照物的比较数据,因此这项试验将研究吸入甲氧氟烷与意大利院前和急诊环境中标准治疗(SoC)相比治疗急性创伤相关疼痛的疗效和安全性。

方法

MEDITA(甲氧氟烷在意大利急诊室)是一项 IIIb 期、前瞻性、随机、活性对照、平行组、开放标签、多中心试验。共有 272 名因肢体创伤而出现中度至重度疼痛(NRS 评分≥4)的成年患者将随机分为 1:1 组,分别接受 3 mL 甲氧氟烷(由患者自行通过吸入在受过培训的人员监督下给药)或目前在意大利构成 SoC 的药物[静脉注射(IV)吗啡用于重度疼痛(NRS≥7);IV 对乙酰氨基酚或酮洛芬用于中度疼痛(NRS 4-6)],在随机分组后尽快给药。

预期结果

疼痛强度将使用基线(随机分组时)和 30 分钟内的 100-mm 视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行测量。记录患者报告的疼痛缓解开始时间和使用解救药物的情况。患者将在随机分组后 30 分钟时使用 5 分制 Likert 量表对研究治疗的疗效和医疗保健专业人员的实用性进行评分。记录不良事件,直至 14±2 天的安全性随访。生命体征将在基线、10 和 30 分钟时测量。主要目的是证明甲氧氟烷与 SoC 相比,在基线(随机分组)至 3、5 和 10 分钟时 VAS 疼痛强度的变化无劣效性。

试验注册

EudraCT 编号:2017-001565-25。Clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT03585374。

资金

Mundipharma 制药有限公司。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72bb/6318254/4b97a051998c/12325_2018_830_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72bb/6318254/4b97a051998c/12325_2018_830_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72bb/6318254/4b97a051998c/12325_2018_830_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Methoxyflurane Versus Standard of Care for Acute Trauma-Related Pain in the Emergency Setting: Protocol for a Randomised, Controlled Study in Italy (MEDITA).甲氧基氟烷与常规护理治疗急诊创伤相关疼痛的比较:意大利一项随机对照研究方案(MEDITA)。
Adv Ther. 2019 Jan;36(1):244-256. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0830-x. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
2
Analgesic Efficacy, Practicality and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Analgesic Treatment for Acute Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Randomised, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicentre Trial in Italy (MEDITA).吸入甲氧氟烷对急诊急性创伤疼痛的镇痛效果、实用性和安全性与标准镇痛治疗的比较:意大利一项随机、开放标签、阳性对照、多中心试验(MEDITA)。
Adv Ther. 2019 Nov;36(11):3030-3046. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01055-9. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
3
Prospective, Multicentre Trial of Methoxyflurane for Acute Trauma-Related Pain in Helicopter Emergency Medical Systems and Hostile Environments: METEORA Protocol.甲氧基氟烷用于直升机紧急医疗系统和恶劣环境中急性创伤相关疼痛的前瞻性、多中心试验:METEORA 方案。
Adv Ther. 2018 Nov;35(11):2081-2092. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0816-8. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
4
Methoxyflurane Analgesia in Adult Patients in the Emergency Department: A Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study (STOP!).急诊科成年患者的甲氧氟烷镇痛:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究(STOP!)的亚组分析
Adv Ther. 2016 Nov;33(11):2012-2031. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0405-7. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
5
Inhaled methoxyflurane (Penthrox®) versus placebo for injury-associated analgesia in children-the MAGPIE trial (MEOF-002): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.吸入甲氧氟烷(Penthrōx®)与安慰剂治疗儿童损伤相关疼痛的效果比较——MAGPIE 试验(MEOF-002):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Jul 4;20(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3511-4.
6
Inhaled Methoxyflurane versus Intravenous Morphine for Severe Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: Subgroup Analysis of MEDITA, a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial.急诊环境下吸入甲氧氟烷与静脉注射吗啡用于严重创伤疼痛的比较:多中心、随机、对照、开放标签试验MEDITA的亚组分析
J Pain Res. 2020 Mar 6;13:491-502. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S240911. eCollection 2020.
7
Inhaled Methoxyflurane Provides Greater Analgesia and Faster Onset of Action Versus Standard Analgesia in Patients With Trauma Pain: InMEDIATE: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Emergency Departments.吸入甲氧氟烷相较于标准镇痛在创伤疼痛患者中提供更强的镇痛效果和更快的起效时间:INMEDIATE:急诊科的一项随机对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Mar;75(3):315-328. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.07.028. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
8
Efficacy, Practicality, and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane in Elderly Patients with Acute Trauma Pain: Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Open-Label Trial (MEDITA).吸入式甲氧氟烷用于老年急性创伤疼痛患者的疗效、实用性及安全性:一项随机、对照、多中心、开放标签试验(MEDITA)的亚组分析
J Pain Res. 2020 Jul 16;13:1777-1784. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S255532. eCollection 2020.
9
STOP!: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of methoxyflurane for the treatment of acute pain.STOP!:一项关于甲氧氟烷治疗急性疼痛的疗效和安全性的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Emerg Med J. 2014 Aug;31(8):613-8. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202909. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
10
Inhaled methoxyflurane for the management of trauma related pain in patients admitted to hospital emergency departments: a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial (PenASAP study).吸入甲氧氟烷治疗因创伤导致疼痛而收入医院急诊科的患者:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验(PenASAP 研究)。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;27(6):414-421. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000686.

引用本文的文献

1
Penthrox Is an Effective Analgesic but Is It Patient Approved?喷他佐辛是一种有效的镇痛药,但它得到患者认可了吗?
Cureus. 2024 Feb 4;16(2):e53537. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53537. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Efficacy, Practicality, and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane in Elderly Patients with Acute Trauma Pain: Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Open-Label Trial (MEDITA).吸入式甲氧氟烷用于老年急性创伤疼痛患者的疗效、实用性及安全性:一项随机、对照、多中心、开放标签试验(MEDITA)的亚组分析
J Pain Res. 2020 Jul 16;13:1777-1784. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S255532. eCollection 2020.
3
Inhaled Methoxyflurane versus Intravenous Morphine for Severe Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: Subgroup Analysis of MEDITA, a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
A Review of the Burden of Trauma Pain in Emergency Settings in Europe.欧洲急诊环境中创伤疼痛负担的综述。
Pain Ther. 2018 Dec;7(2):179-192. doi: 10.1007/s40122-018-0101-1. Epub 2018 Jun 2.
2
Administration of intravenous morphine for acute pain in the emergency department inflicts an economic burden in Europe.在欧洲,急诊科使用静脉注射吗啡治疗急性疼痛会带来经济负担。
Drugs Context. 2018 Apr 11;7:212524. doi: 10.7573/dic.212524. eCollection 2018.
3
Painful Discrimination in the Emergency Department: Risk Factors for Underassessment of Patients' Pain by Nurses.
急诊环境下吸入甲氧氟烷与静脉注射吗啡用于严重创伤疼痛的比较:多中心、随机、对照、开放标签试验MEDITA的亚组分析
J Pain Res. 2020 Mar 6;13:491-502. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S240911. eCollection 2020.
4
RWE Framework: An Interactive Visual Tool to Support a Real-World Evidence Study Design.真实世界证据框架:一种支持真实世界证据研究设计的交互式可视化工具。
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2019 Dec;6(4):193-203. doi: 10.1007/s40801-019-00167-6.
5
Analgesic Efficacy, Practicality and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Analgesic Treatment for Acute Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Randomised, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicentre Trial in Italy (MEDITA).吸入甲氧氟烷对急诊急性创伤疼痛的镇痛效果、实用性和安全性与标准镇痛治疗的比较:意大利一项随机、开放标签、阳性对照、多中心试验(MEDITA)。
Adv Ther. 2019 Nov;36(11):3030-3046. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01055-9. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
6
Response to "A Rigorous Evaluation of Methoxyflurane is Needed: Comment on 'Methoxyflurane Versus Standard of Care for Acute Trauma-Related Pain in the Emergency Setting: Protocol for a Randomised, Controlled Study in Italy (MEDITA)'".对《需要对甲氧氟烷进行严格评估:对“甲氧氟烷与急诊环境中急性创伤相关疼痛的护理标准:意大利一项随机对照研究方案(MEDITA)”的评论》的回应
Adv Ther. 2019 Jun;36(6):1243-1245. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00937-2. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
7
A Rigorous Evaluation of Methoxyflurane is Needed: Comment on "Methoxyflurane Versus Standard of Care for Acute Trauma-Related Pain in the Emergency Setting: Protocol for a Randomised, Controlled Study in Italy (MEDITA)".需要对甲氧氟烷进行严格评估:对“甲氧氟烷与急诊环境中急性创伤相关疼痛的护理标准:意大利一项随机对照研究的方案(MEDITA)”的评论
Adv Ther. 2019 Jun;36(6):1241-1242. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00936-3. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
急诊科中的痛苦歧视:护士对患者疼痛评估不足的风险因素
J Emerg Nurs. 2017 May;43(3):228-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2016.10.007. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
4
Methoxyflurane Analgesia in Adult Patients in the Emergency Department: A Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study (STOP!).急诊科成年患者的甲氧氟烷镇痛:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究(STOP!)的亚组分析
Adv Ther. 2016 Nov;33(11):2012-2031. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0405-7. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
5
The Use of Intravenous Acetaminophen for Acute Pain in the Emergency Department.静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚在急诊科急性疼痛治疗中的应用
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 May;23(5):543-53. doi: 10.1111/acem.12921. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
6
Analgesic use of inhaled methoxyflurane: Evaluation of its potential nephrotoxicity.吸入用甲氧氟烷的镇痛用途:对其潜在肾毒性的评估。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2016 Jan;35(1):91-100. doi: 10.1177/0960327115578743. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
7
Pain management in the emergency chain: the use and effectiveness of pain management in patients with acute musculoskeletal pain.急诊环节中的疼痛管理:急性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者疼痛管理的应用与效果
Pain Med. 2015 May;16(5):970-84. doi: 10.1111/pme.12668. Epub 2014 Dec 28.
8
STOP!: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of methoxyflurane for the treatment of acute pain.STOP!:一项关于甲氧氟烷治疗急性疼痛的疗效和安全性的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Emerg Med J. 2014 Aug;31(8):613-8. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202909. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
9
Intravenous paracetamol versus dexketoprofen versus morphine in acute mechanical low back pain in the emergency department: a randomised double-blind controlled trial.急诊科急性机械性下背痛患者中静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚、右酮洛芬与吗啡的疗效比较:一项随机双盲对照试验
Emerg Med J. 2014 Mar;31(3):177-81. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201670. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
10
Nitrous oxide for early analgesia in the emergency setting: a randomized, double-blind multicenter prehospital trial.氧化亚氮在急诊早期镇痛中的应用:一项随机、双盲、多中心的院前试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;20(2):178-84. doi: 10.1111/acem.12072.