Suppr超能文献

在不可切除的肝细胞癌中,先前免疫检查点抑制剂治疗进展后使用度伐鲁单抗联合曲美木单抗的治疗反应。

Treatment response to durvalumab plus tremelimumab after progression with previous immune checkpoint inhibitor in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

作者信息

Mori Nami, Tamaki Nobuharu, Takaki Shintaro, Tsuji Keiji, Tada Toshifumi, Nakamura Shinichiro, Ochi Hironori, Mashiba Toshie, Doisaki Masao, Marusawa Hiroyuki, Kobashi Haruhiko, Fujii Hideki, Ogawa Chikara, Nonogi Michiko, Arai Hirotaka, Uchida Yasushi, Urawa Naohito, Narita Ryoichi, Akahane Takehiro, Kondo Masahiko, Yasui Yutaka, Tsuchiya Kaoru, Izumi Namiki, Kurosaki Masayuki

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital & Atomic-Bomb Survivors Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, 1-26-1 Kyonan-cho, Musashino-shi, Tokyo, 180-8610, Japan.

出版信息

Invest New Drugs. 2024 Oct;42(5):559-565. doi: 10.1007/s10637-024-01470-y. Epub 2024 Aug 30.

Abstract

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are used for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), it is unclear whether sequential ICI treatment-durvalumab plus tremelimumab (DT) after progression on atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB)-is effective for HCC. In this nationwide multicenter study, we aimed to investigate the effect of DT treatment based on the timing of treatment. A total of 85 patients receiving DT treatment were enrolled. The primary endpoint is treatment response at week 8 among patients receiving first-line DT treatment, those receiving second-line or later treatment without prior AB therapy, and those receiving second-line or later treatment with prior AB therapy. Objective response rates (ORRs) in patients with first-line treatment, second-line treatment without AB, and second-line treatment with prior AB were 44%, 54%, and 5%, respectively (p < 0.001). Similarly, disease control rates (DCRs) were 69%, 91%, and 26%, respectively (p < 0.001). ORR and DCR were significantly lower in patients with prior AB treatment. Progression free survival (PFS) was significantly shortened in patients receiving second-line therapy following prior AB treatment and an adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) in those patients for PFS, using first-line therapy as a reference, was 2.35 (1.1-5.1, p = 0.03). In conclusion, the impact of DT sequencing following AB treatment was limited. However, even after second-line treatment, the treatment effect can be equivalent to that of first-line treatment in cases with no history of AB treatment. Thus, prior treatment history should be taken into account when initiating DT treatment.

摘要

尽管免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)用于不可切除的肝细胞癌(HCC),但尚不清楚在阿替利珠单抗加贝伐单抗(AB)治疗进展后序贯ICI治疗——度伐利尤单抗加曲美木单抗(DT)——对HCC是否有效。在这项全国性多中心研究中,我们旨在根据治疗时机研究DT治疗的效果。共有85例接受DT治疗的患者入组。主要终点是接受一线DT治疗的患者、接受二线或更晚治疗且未接受过AB治疗的患者以及接受二线或更晚治疗且接受过AB治疗的患者在第8周时的治疗反应。一线治疗、未接受AB的二线治疗和接受过AB的二线治疗患者的客观缓解率(ORR)分别为44%、54%和5%(p < 0.001)。同样,疾病控制率(DCR)分别为69%、91%和26%(p < 0.001)。接受过AB治疗的患者的ORR和DCR显著更低。接受过AB治疗后接受二线治疗的患者无进展生存期(PFS)显著缩短,以一线治疗为对照,这些患者PFS的调整后风险比(95%置信区间)为2.35(1.1 - 5.1,p = 0.03)。总之,AB治疗后序贯DT的影响有限。然而,即使在二线治疗后,在无AB治疗史的情况下治疗效果可等同于一线治疗。因此,开始DT治疗时应考虑既往治疗史。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验