Shkembi Abas, Zelner Jon, Park Sung Kyun, Neitzel Richard
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Aug 30. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02143-5.
Ignoring workplace exposures that occur beyond the local residential context in place-based risk indices like the CDC's Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) likely misclassifies community exposure by under-counting risks and obscuring true drivers of racial/ethnic health disparities. To investigate this hypothesis, we developed several place-based indicators of occupational exposure and examined their relationships with race/ethnicity, SVI, and health inequities. We used publicly available job exposure matrices and employment estimates from the United States (US) Census to create and map six indicators of occupational hazards for every census tract in the US. We characterized census tracts with high workplace-low SVI scores. We used natural cubic splines to examine tract level associations between the percentage of racial/ethnic minorities (individuals who are not non-Hispanic White) and the occupational indicators. Lastly, we stratified each census tract into high/low occupational noise, chemical pollutant, and disease/infection exposure to examine racial/ethnic health disparities to diabetes, asthma, and high blood pressure, respectively, as a consequence of occupational exposure inequities. Our results show that racial/ethnic minority communities, particularly those that are also low-income, experience a disproportionate burden of workplace exposures that may be contributing to racial/ethnic health disparities. When composite risk measures, such as SVI, are calculated using only information from the local residential neighborhood, they may systematically under-count occupational risks experienced by the most vulnerable communities. There is a need to consider the role of occupational justice on nationwide, racial/ethnic health disparities.
在诸如疾病控制与预防中心的社会脆弱性指数(SVI)等基于地点的风险指数中,忽略当地居住环境之外发生的工作场所暴露情况,可能会因低估风险和掩盖种族/族裔健康差异的真正驱动因素而对社区暴露情况进行错误分类。为了研究这一假设,我们开发了几个基于地点的职业暴露指标,并研究了它们与种族/族裔、SVI和健康不平等之间的关系。我们使用公开可用的工作暴露矩阵和来自美国人口普查的就业估计数据,为美国的每个普查区创建并绘制了六个职业危害指标。我们对工作场所SVI得分低的普查区进行了特征描述。我们使用自然立方样条来检验种族/族裔少数群体(非西班牙裔白人以外的个体)百分比与职业指标之间的普查区层面关联。最后,我们将每个普查区分层为高/低职业噪声、化学污染物和疾病/感染暴露区,以分别研究职业暴露不平等导致的种族/族裔在糖尿病、哮喘和高血压方面的健康差异。我们的结果表明,种族/族裔少数群体社区,尤其是那些同时也是低收入的社区,承受着不成比例的工作场所暴露负担,这可能导致了种族/族裔健康差异。当仅使用当地居住社区的信息来计算诸如SVI等综合风险指标时,它们可能会系统性地低估最脆弱社区所经历的职业风险。有必要考虑职业公正在全国范围内种族/族裔健康差异方面的作用。