• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于全小肠长度与标准胆胰支长度对吻合口胃旁路术行个体化胆胰支长度的效果:TAILOR 随机临床优势试验的 1 年结果。

Effect of tailoring biliopancreatic limb length based on total small bowel length versus standard limb length in one anastomosis gastric bypass: 1-year outcomes of the TAILOR randomized clinical superiority trial.

机构信息

Center for Obesity Northern Netherlands, Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2024 Aug 30;111(9). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae219.

DOI:10.1093/bjs/znae219
PMID:39213130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11363871/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tailoring the biliopancreatic limb length in one anastomosis gastric bypass is proposed as beneficial in retrospective studies, yet randomized trials are lacking. The aim of this double-blind, single-centre RCT was to ascertain whether tailoring biliopancreatic limb length based on total small bowel length (TSBL) results in superior outcomes after one anastomosis gastric bypass compared with a fixed 150 cm biliopancreatic limb length.

METHODS

Eligible patients, meeting International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) criteria for metabolic bariatric surgery, scheduled for primary one anastomosis gastric bypass surgery, and willing to be randomized, underwent TSBL measurement during surgery. When TSBL measurement was feasible, patients were randomly assigned to a standard 150 cm biliopancreatic limb length or a tailored biliopancreatic limb based on TSBL: TSBL less than 500 cm, biliopancreatic limb 150 cm; TSBL 500-700 cm, biliopancreatic limb 180 cm; and TSBL greater than 700 cm, biliopancreatic limb 210 cm. The primary outcome was percentage total weight loss at 5 years.

RESULTS

Between September 2020 and August 2022, 212 patients were randomized into the standard biliopancreatic limb group (105 patients) or the tailored biliopancreatic limb group (107 patients). The mean(s.d.) TSBL was 657(128) cm (range 295-1020 cm). In the tailored group, 150, 180, and 210 cm biliopancreatic limb lengths were applied to 8.4%, 53.3%, and 38.3% of patients respectively. The mean(s.d.) 1-year percentage total weight loss was 32.8(6.9)% in the standard group and 33.1(6.2)% in the tailored group (P = 0.787). Nutritional deficiencies and short-term complications showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Tailoring biliopancreatic limb length based on TSBL is safe and feasible. One year after surgery, it is not superior to a standard biliopancreatic limb length of 150 cm in terms of percentage total weight loss.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

Dutch Trial Register, NL7945.

摘要

背景

在一项吻合口胃旁路手术中,将胆胰支长度定制为一个吻合口被认为是有益的,尽管缺乏随机对照试验。本双盲、单中心 RCT 的目的是确定基于总小肠长度(TSBL)定制胆胰支长度是否优于固定 150cm 的胆胰支长度,从而在吻合口胃旁路手术后获得更好的结果。

方法

符合国际肥胖与代谢外科学会(IFSO)代谢减重手术标准、计划行初次吻合口胃旁路手术且愿意接受随机分组的合格患者,在手术期间进行 TSBL 测量。当可行 TSBL 测量时,患者被随机分配至标准 150cm 胆胰支长度或基于 TSBL 的定制胆胰支长度:TSBL<500cm,胆胰支 150cm;TSBL 500-700cm,胆胰支 180cm;TSBL>700cm,胆胰支 210cm。主要结局为 5 年时的总体重减轻百分比。

结果

2020 年 9 月至 2022 年 8 月,212 例患者被随机分为标准胆胰支组(105 例)或定制胆胰支组(107 例)。TSBL 的平均值(标准差)为 657(128)cm(范围 295-1020cm)。在定制组中,150cm、180cm 和 210cm 的胆胰支长度分别适用于 8.4%、53.3%和 38.3%的患者。标准组和定制组的 1 年总体重减轻百分比分别为 32.8(6.9)%和 33.1(6.2)%(P=0.787)。营养缺乏和短期并发症无显著差异。

结论

基于 TSBL 定制胆胰支长度是安全可行的。术后 1 年,在总体重减轻百分比方面,与 150cm 的标准胆胰支长度相比并不具有优势。

注册号

荷兰临床试验注册中心,NL7945。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d647/11363871/f56f75ce4b04/znae219f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d647/11363871/ed5a3de47a0d/znae219f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d647/11363871/faf453e09b0d/znae219f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d647/11363871/f56f75ce4b04/znae219f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d647/11363871/ed5a3de47a0d/znae219f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d647/11363871/faf453e09b0d/znae219f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d647/11363871/f56f75ce4b04/znae219f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of tailoring biliopancreatic limb length based on total small bowel length versus standard limb length in one anastomosis gastric bypass: 1-year outcomes of the TAILOR randomized clinical superiority trial.基于全小肠长度与标准胆胰支长度对吻合口胃旁路术行个体化胆胰支长度的效果:TAILOR 随机临床优势试验的 1 年结果。
Br J Surg. 2024 Aug 30;111(9). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae219.
2
Tailoring limb length based on total small bowel length in one anastomosis gastric bypass surgery (TAILOR study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于单吻合口胃旁路手术中小肠总长度来定制肢体长度(TAILOR 研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jun 22;23(1):526. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06456-w.
3
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-Mini Gastric Bypass with Tailored Biliopancreatic Limb Length Formula Relative to Small Bowel Length: Preliminary Results.一种吻合口胃旁路术-迷你胃旁路术,采用与小肠长度相关的定制胆胰肠袢长度公式:初步结果。
Obes Surg. 2019 Sep;29(9):3062-3070. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04019-8.
4
Correlation of T2DM and Anthropometric Measures with Total Small Bowel Length and Its Effects on Diabetes Remission After Bariatric Surgery.2 型糖尿病与人体测量学指标与全小肠长度的相关性及其对减重手术后糖尿病缓解的影响。
Obes Surg. 2024 Apr;34(4):1238-1246. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07105-8. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
5
Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.一种吻合胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗肥胖症的疗效和安全性比较(YOMEGA):一项多中心、随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 30;393(10178):1299-1309. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30475-1. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
6
The length of the biliopancreatic limb in one anastomosis gastric bypass.单吻合口胃旁路术中胆胰支的长度
Front Surg. 2024 Aug 14;11:1248744. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1248744. eCollection 2024.
7
Long versus short biliopancreatic limb in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial.胃旁路术后长短胆胰支的随机临床试验:短期结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 Aug;17(8):1425-1430. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.03.030. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
8
Proximal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: Addressing the myth of limb length.近端胃旁路术:破解“肢体长度”的误区。
Surgery. 2019 Oct;166(4):445-455. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.046. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
9
Conventional Versus Distal Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Randomized Controlled Trial with 1-Year Follow-up.传统腹腔镜与远端腹腔镜胃旁路术:一项具有 1 年随访的随机对照试验。
Obes Surg. 2019 Oct;29(10):3103-3110. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03991-5.
10
A long biliopancreatic and short alimentary limb results in more weight loss in revisional RYGB surgery. Outcomes of the randomized controlled ELEGANCE REDO trial.长胆胰肠吻合和短胃肠吻合导致再次 RYGB 手术减重更多。随机对照 ELEGANCE REDO 试验的结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Jan;15(1):60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at 5 years (YOMEGA): a prospective, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised extension study.5 年随访结果:一种吻合口胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的疗效和安全性比较(YOMEGA):一项前瞻性、开放标签、非劣效性、随机扩展研究。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024 Apr;12(4):267-276. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00035-4. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
2
IFSO Consensus on Definitions and Clinical Practice Guidelines for Obesity Management-an International Delphi Study.国际肥胖管理共识定义和临床实践指南——一项国际 Delphi 研究。
Obes Surg. 2024 Jan;34(1):30-42. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06913-8. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
3
Roux-en-Y versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass (RYSA study): weight loss, metabolic improvements, and nutrition at 1 year after surgery, a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Roux-en-Y 与单吻合口胃旁路术(RYSA 研究):手术后 1 年的体重减轻、代谢改善和营养情况,一项多中心随机对照试验。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2023 Dec;31(12):2909-2923. doi: 10.1002/oby.23852.
4
Malnutrition Following One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review.胃旁路术后营养不良:系统评价。
Obes Surg. 2023 Dec;33(12):4137-4146. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06907-6. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
5
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) with a 150-cm Biliopancreatic Limb (BPL) Versus a 200-cm BPL, a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.150cm 胆胰支与 200cm 胆胰支的 1 型胃旁路术(OAGB):系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2023 Jun;33(6):1846-1856. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06556-9. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
6
Protein malnutrition after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a challenging case and scoping review of the literature.胃旁路术后蛋白质营养不良:一个挑战性病例及文献综述
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023 Jul;19(7):746-754. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.12.032. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
7
Validation of the Dutch Version of the BODY-Q Measuring Appearance, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Experience of Healthcare in Patients Undergoing Bariatric and Body Contouring Surgery.验证荷兰版 BODY-Q 在接受减重和身体塑形手术的患者中测量外貌、健康相关生活质量和医疗体验的有效性。
Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Apr 10;43(5):569-579. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjac311.
8
Tailoring limb length based on total small bowel length in one anastomosis gastric bypass surgery (TAILOR study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于单吻合口胃旁路手术中小肠总长度来定制肢体长度(TAILOR 研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jun 22;23(1):526. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06456-w.
9
Laparoscopic Small Bowel Length Measurement in Bariatric Surgery Using a Hand-Over-Hand Technique with Marked Graspers: an Ex Vivo Experiment.腹腔镜减重手术中采用双手交接技术配合标记抓钳测量小肠长度:一项离体实验。
Obes Surg. 2022 Apr;32(4):1201-1208. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-05918-z. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
10
Consensus Report: Definition and Interpretation of Remission in Type 2 Diabetes.共识报告:2型糖尿病缓解的定义与解读
Diabetes Care. 2021 Aug 30;44(10):2438-44. doi: 10.2337/dci21-0034.