• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Roux-en-Y 与单吻合口胃旁路术(RYSA 研究):手术后 1 年的体重减轻、代谢改善和营养情况,一项多中心随机对照试验。

Roux-en-Y versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass (RYSA study): weight loss, metabolic improvements, and nutrition at 1 year after surgery, a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Obesity Research Unit, Research Program for Clinical and Molecular Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Departement of Internal Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Obesity (Silver Spring). 2023 Dec;31(12):2909-2923. doi: 10.1002/oby.23852.

DOI:10.1002/oby.23852
PMID:37987183
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although it has been suggested that one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is metabolically superior to the "gold standard," i.e., Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), there is little robust evidence to prove it. Because this result may arise from the typically longer length of bypassed intestine in OAGB, here, the authors standardized the bypass length in RYGB and OAGB and compared weight loss and metabolic outcomes in a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

The authors randomized 121 bariatric patients to RYGB (n = 61) or OAGB (n = 60) in two Finnish University Hospitals and measured weight; body composition; metabolic features (insulin sensitivity, lipids, inflammation, nutrition); and comorbidities before and 6 and 12 months after the operation.

RESULTS

Total weight loss was similar in RYGB and OAGB at 6 months (mean: 21.2% [95% CI: 19.4-23.0] vs. 22.8% [95% CI: 21.5-24.1], p = 0.136) and 12 months (25.4% [95% CI: 23.4-27.5] vs. 26.1% [95% CI: 24.2-28.9], p = 0.635). Insulin sensitivity, lipids, and inflammation improved similarly between the groups (p > 0.05). Remission of type 2 diabetes and hypercholesterolemia was marked and similar (p > 0.05) but the use of antihypertensive medications was lower (p = 0.037) and hypertension tended to improve more (p = 0.053) with RYGB versus OAGB at 12 months. Higher rates of vitamin D-25 deficiency (p < 0.05) and lower D-25 levels were observed with OAGB versus RYGB throughout the follow-up (p < 0.001). No differences in adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

RYGB and OAGB were comparable in weight loss, metabolic improvement, remission of diabetes and hypercholesterolemia, and nutrition at 1-year follow-up. Vitamin D-25 deficiency was more prevalent with OAGB, whereas reduction in antihypertensive medications and hypertension was greater with RYGB. There is no need to change the current practices of RYGB in favor of OAGB.

摘要

目的

尽管有人认为单吻合胃旁路术(OAGB)在代谢方面优于“金标准”,即 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB),但目前几乎没有强有力的证据证明这一点。由于 OAGB 通常具有更长的旁路肠长度,因此,作者在 RYGB 和 OAGB 中标准化了旁路长度,并在一项随机对照试验中比较了减重和代谢结果。

方法

作者将 121 名肥胖症患者随机分配至两所芬兰大学医院的 RYGB(n=61)或 OAGB(n=60)组,并在手术前和术后 6 个月和 12 个月测量体重、身体成分、代谢特征(胰岛素敏感性、脂质、炎症、营养)和合并症。

结果

6 个月时,RYGB 和 OAGB 的总减重相似(平均:21.2%[95%CI:19.4-23.0] vs. 22.8%[95%CI:21.5-24.1],p=0.136)和 12 个月时(25.4%[95%CI:23.4-27.5] vs. 26.1%[95%CI:24.2-28.9],p=0.635)。两组的胰岛素敏感性、脂质和炎症均得到相似改善(p>0.05)。2 型糖尿病和高胆固醇血症的缓解显著且相似(p>0.05),但与 OAGB 相比,使用降压药物较少(p=0.037),高血压在 12 个月时也有改善(p=0.053)。OAGB 组维生素 D-25 缺乏的发生率更高(p<0.05),且在整个随访过程中 D-25 水平更低(p<0.001)。未观察到不良事件存在差异。

结论

在 1 年随访时,RYGB 和 OAGB 在减重、代谢改善、糖尿病和高胆固醇血症缓解以及营养方面无差异。OAGB 组维生素 D-25 缺乏更为常见,而 RYGB 组降压药物和高血压的减少更为明显。没有必要改变 RYGB 的现行实践转而支持 OAGB。

相似文献

1
Roux-en-Y versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass (RYSA study): weight loss, metabolic improvements, and nutrition at 1 year after surgery, a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Roux-en-Y 与单吻合口胃旁路术(RYSA 研究):手术后 1 年的体重减轻、代谢改善和营养情况,一项多中心随机对照试验。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2023 Dec;31(12):2909-2923. doi: 10.1002/oby.23852.
2
Long-term follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a prospective randomized comparative study of weight loss and remission of comorbidities.袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与单吻合口胃旁路术的长期随访:减肥和缓解合并症的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):401-410. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6307-9. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
3
Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score and Micronutrient Deficiency in Bariatric Patients: Midterm Outcomes of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass.控制营养状况(CONUT)评分和肥胖症患者的微量营养素缺乏:Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与单吻合口胃旁路术/迷你胃旁路术的中期结果。
Obes Surg. 2021 Aug;31(8):3715-3726. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05486-8. Epub 2021 May 24.
4
Long Biliopancreatic Limb Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Randomized Controlled Study.双通道式 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与单吻合口胃旁路术治疗 2 型糖尿病的随机对照研究。
Obes Surg. 2023 Jul;33(7):1966-1973. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06631-1. Epub 2023 May 13.
5
Long-Term Weight Loss Results, Remission of Comorbidities and Nutritional Deficiencies of Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) on Type 2 Diabetic (T2D) Patients.袖状胃切除术(SG)、胃旁路术(RYGB)和单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)治疗 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的长期减重效果、合并症缓解和营养缺乏情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 20;17(20):7644. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207644.
6
Variation in HbA1c in Patients with Obesity and type 2 Diabetes Mellitus 12 months after Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.腹腔镜胃旁路手术和腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术后肥胖 2 型糖尿病患者 12 个月时 HbA1c 的变化:一项回顾性配对队列研究。
Obes Surg. 2024 Mar;34(3):940-946. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07067-x. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
7
Nutritional Status after Roux-En-Y (Rygb) and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (Oagb) at 6-Month Follow-Up: A Comparative Study.Roux-en-Y(Rygb)和单吻合口胃旁路术(Oagb)术后 6 个月的营养状况:一项比较研究。
Nutrients. 2022 Jul 9;14(14):2823. doi: 10.3390/nu14142823.
8
Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at 5 years (YOMEGA): a prospective, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised extension study.5 年随访结果:一种吻合口胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的疗效和安全性比较(YOMEGA):一项前瞻性、开放标签、非劣效性、随机扩展研究。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024 Apr;12(4):267-276. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00035-4. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
9
Roux-en-Y Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as Redo-Operations Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Study.胃旁路术与单吻合口胃旁路术治疗袖状胃切除术后再手术的比较:一项回顾性研究。
World J Surg. 2022 Apr;46(4):855-864. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06424-6. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
10
One anastomosis gastric bypass vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a 5-year follow-up prospective randomized trial.单吻合口胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术:一项 5 年随访前瞻性随机试验。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Feb;406(1):171-179. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01949-1. Epub 2020 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
One-Anastomosis Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in the Resolution of Comorbidities: A Non-inferiority Meta-analysis and Meta-regression.单吻合术与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术对合并症的治疗效果:一项非劣效性Meta分析和Meta回归分析
Obes Surg. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-08077-z.
2
Dumping Syndrome After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-A Systematic Review.单吻合口胃旁路术后倾倒综合征——一项系统评价
Obes Surg. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07860-2.
3
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux‑en‑Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity: An Updated Meta‑analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
单吻合口胃旁路术与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术治疗肥胖症的比较:随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析和系统评价
Obes Surg. 2025 Apr;35(4):1438-1446. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07776-x. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
4
Management of nutritional deficiencies following one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): a single-center experience.单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)后营养缺乏的管理:单中心经验
Updates Surg. 2025 Jan 20. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02094-4.
5
Comparison of Micronutrient Deficiencies Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和单吻合口胃旁路术后微量营养素缺乏情况的比较
Cureus. 2024 Oct 19;16(10):e71837. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71837. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与单吻合口胃旁路术的比较安全性和疗效:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2024 Oct 10;16(10):e71193. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71193. eCollection 2024 Oct.
7
An abdominal obesity missense variant in the adipocyte thermogenesis gene TBX15 is implicated in adaptation to cold in Finns.在芬兰人中,脂肪细胞产热基因 TBX15 中的一个腹部肥胖错义变异与对寒冷的适应有关。
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Nov 7;111(11):2542-2560. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.10.001.
8
Effect of tailoring biliopancreatic limb length based on total small bowel length versus standard limb length in one anastomosis gastric bypass: 1-year outcomes of the TAILOR randomized clinical superiority trial.基于全小肠长度与标准胆胰支长度对吻合口胃旁路术行个体化胆胰支长度的效果:TAILOR 随机临床优势试验的 1 年结果。
Br J Surg. 2024 Aug 30;111(9). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae219.
9
One Year Changes in Body Composition and Musculoskeletal Health Following Metabolic/Bariatric Surgery.代谢/减重手术后身体成分和肌肉骨骼健康的一年变化
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Apr 22;110(5):e1598-e1608. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae496.