• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响肾移植等待时间的因素。

Determinants of Long Waiting Time to Kidney Transplantation.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2024 Oct;56(8):1740-1751. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.08.010. Epub 2024 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.08.010
PMID:39214720
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disparity in waiting time to kidney transplantation led to new policy (KAS250). Our aims were to identify variables associated with long wait time (LWT); assess the impact of KAS250 on WT; and analyze modifiable transplant center behaviors correlated with WT.

METHODS

SRTR data for adult deceased donor kidney transplants were analyzed. Time-periods from 8/1/2018-7/31/2019 and 5/1/2021-4/30/2022 were chosen for pre- and post-KAS250 analyses. Transplant centers were categorized as LWT or SWT centers depending on whether pre-KAS250 median center waiting times were greater or less than the national pre-KAS250 median waiting time of 57.8 months.

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, transplantation with HCV NAT negative kidneys was associated with an additional 21.3 months of WT (CI: 18.5-24.2, P < .0001), and transplantation with KDPI <85% kidneys was associated with an additional 10.8 months (CI: 8.2-13.3, P < .0001). Post-KAS250 national kidney transplant waiting time decreased from 61-58 months (P < .0001) and waiting time at LWT centers decreased from 74-69 months (P < .0001). Cold ischemic times (CIT) increased (20.2 hours vs 18.3 hours, P < .0001) and DGF rates also increased (32.7% vs 31.0%, P < .0001). Centers generally displayed more aggressive transplantation practices post-KAS250 however significant differences in DCD utilization, organ offer acceptance ratios and tolerance for long CIT persist between SWT and LWT centers.

CONCLUSION

KAS250 has reduced waiting time disparities between SWT and LWT centers at the cost of increased CIT and DGF and reduced allocation efficiency. Significant differences in transplant practice persist between SWT and LWT centers.

摘要

背景

肾脏移植等待时间的差异导致了新政策(KAS250)的出台。我们的目的是确定与长等待时间(LWT)相关的变量;评估 KAS250 对 WT 的影响;并分析与 WT 相关的可修改的移植中心行为。

方法

对成人尸体供肾移植的 SRTR 数据进行了分析。选择了 2018 年 8 月 1 日至 2019 年 7 月 31 日和 2021 年 5 月 1 日至 2022 年 4 月 30 日两个时间段进行 KAS250 前后的分析。根据中心的预 KAS250 中位等待时间是否大于或小于全国预 KAS250 的中位等待时间 57.8 个月,将移植中心分为 LWT 或 SWT 中心。

结果

在多变量分析中,HCV NAT 阴性肾脏的移植与额外 21.3 个月的 WT 相关(CI:18.5-24.2,P<.0001),KDPI<85%的肾脏的移植与额外 10.8 个月的 WT 相关(CI:8.2-13.3,P<.0001)。KAS250 后,全国肾脏移植等待时间从 61-58 个月(P<.0001)下降,LWT 中心的等待时间从 74-69 个月(P<.0001)下降。冷缺血时间(CIT)增加(20.2 小时对 18.3 小时,P<.0001),DGF 发生率也增加(32.7%对 31.0%,P<.0001)。KAS250 后,中心普遍表现出更积极的移植实践,但 SWT 和 LWT 中心之间在 DCD 利用率、器官提供接受率和对长 CIT 的容忍度方面仍存在显著差异。

结论

KAS250 降低了 SWT 和 LWT 中心之间的等待时间差距,但代价是 CIT 和 DGF 增加,分配效率降低。SWT 和 LWT 中心之间的移植实践仍存在显著差异。

相似文献

1
Determinants of Long Waiting Time to Kidney Transplantation.影响肾移植等待时间的因素。
Transplant Proc. 2024 Oct;56(8):1740-1751. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.08.010. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
2
Increased volume of organ offers and decreased efficiency of kidney placement under circle-based kidney allocation.基于环的肾脏分配下,器官供体数量增加,肾脏放置效率降低。
Am J Transplant. 2023 Aug;23(8):1209-1220. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 16.
3
Associations Among Circle-Based Kidney Allocation, Center Waiting Time, and Likelihood of Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation.基于循环的肾脏分配、中心等待时间与 deceased-donor 肾脏移植可能性之间的关联。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2025 Feb;85(2):187-195. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.07.014. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
4
Early Effect of the Circular Model of Kidney Allocation in the United States.美国肾脏分配的环形模型的早期效果。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023 Jan 1;34(1):26-39. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2022040471. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
5
Major Variation across Local Transplant Centers in Probability of Kidney Transplant for Wait-Listed Patients.不同地方的移植中心在等待移植的患者中进行肾移植的概率存在较大差异。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Dec;31(12):2900-2911. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020030335. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
6
Association Between Declined Offers of Deceased Donor Kidney Allograft and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Candidates.接受或拒绝已故供体肾移植与肾移植候选人结局的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e1910312. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10312.
7
The extent and predictors of waiting time geographic disparity in kidney transplantation in the United States.美国肾移植中等待时间的地域差异的程度和预测因素。
Transplantation. 2014 May 27;97(10):1049-57. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000438623.89310.dc.
8
Kidney offer acceptance at programs undergoing a Systems Improvement Agreement.接受肾脏捐献的项目正在进行系统改进协议。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Sep;18(9):2182-2188. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14907. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
9
Pulsatile perfusion reduces the risk of delayed graft function in deceased donor kidney transplants, irrespective of donor type and cold ischemic time.脉冲式灌注可降低供体来源和冷缺血时间对移植肾延迟功能恢复的影响。
Transplantation. 2014 Mar 27;97(6):668-74. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000438637.29214.10.
10
The effect of the Statewide Sharing variance on geographic disparity in kidney transplantation in the United States.全州共享差异对美国肾脏移植地理差异的影响。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Aug 7;9(8):1449-60. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05350513. Epub 2014 Jun 26.