Diagnostic utility of velocity ratio for paradoxical low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND

Calcification score by cardiac computed tomography (CT) is required for diagnosis of paradoxical low-flow/low-gradient (PLFLG) aortic stenosis (AS). According to the guideline, velocity ratio (VR) < 0.25 by echocardiography is defined as severe AS, but utility of VR in patients with PLFLG AS remains unknown. This retrospective study was therefore conducted to investigate the utility of VR for a diagnosis of severe AS based on CT in patients with PLFLG AS.

METHODS

We studied 58 patients with PLFLG AS. Severity of AS was defined as calcium score derived from cardiac CT.

RESULTS

Of the 58 patients, 28 (48.3%) were diagnosed with severe AS based on CT, while 23 of them (82.1%) had VR < 0.25. It was noteworthy that receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the optimal VR cutoff value for a diagnosis of severe AS was 0.25, with an area under the curve of 0.870 (P < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of VR < 0.25 for a diagnosis of severe AS were 82.1%, 86.7%, 85.2% and 83.9%, respectively. Furthermore, patients who match the value of VR and severity of AS based on CT had higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation, higher serum brain natriuretic peptide concentration, larger left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and left ventricular stroke volume index.

CONCLUSION

The measurement of VR is simple, and VR < 0.25 can be used for diagnosis of patients with PLFLG AS as severe. Our findings may thus have clinical implications for routine clinical practice.