• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者、实践和组织因素与危重症成人早期活动表现相关。

Patient, Practice, and Organizational Factors Associated With Early Mobility Performance in Critically Ill Adults.

机构信息

Anna E. Krupp is an assistant professor, College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City.

Alai Tan is a research professor, Center for Research and Health Analytics, The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus.

出版信息

Am J Crit Care. 2024 Sep 1;33(5):324-333. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2024939.

DOI:10.4037/ajcc2024939
PMID:39217113
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11675296/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adoption of early mobility interventions into intensive care unit (ICU) practice has been slow and varied.

OBJECTIVES

To examine factors associated with early mobility performance in critically ill adults and evaluate factors' effects on predicting next-day early mobility performance.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of 66 ICUs' data from patients admitted for at least 24 hours. Mixed-effects logistic regression modeling was done, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) calculated.

RESULTS

In 12 489 patients, factors independently associated with higher odds of next-day mobility included significant pain (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.16; 95% CI, 1.09-1.23), documented sedation target (AOR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.18), performance of spontaneous awakening trials (AOR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.59-1.96), spontaneous breathing trials (AOR, 2.35; 95% CI, 2.14-2.58), mobility safety screening (AOR, 2.26; 95% CI, 2.04-2.49), and prior-day physical/occupational therapy (AOR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.30-1.59). Factors independently associated with lower odds of next-day mobility included deep sedation (AOR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.39-0.49), delirium (AOR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.59-0.69), benzodiazepine administration (AOR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79-0.92), physical restraints (AOR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.68-0.80), and mechanical ventilation (AOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68-0.78). Black and Hispanic patients had lower odds of next-day mobility than other patients. Models incorporating patient, practice, and between-unit variations displayed high discriminant accuracy (AUC, 0.853) in predicting next-day early mobility performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, several modifiable and nonmodifiable factors provide excellent prediction of next-day early mobility performance.

摘要

背景

早期活动干预措施在重症监护病房(ICU)实践中的应用一直较为缓慢且各不相同。

目的

探究与危重症成人早期活动表现相关的因素,并评估这些因素对预测次日早期活动表现的作用。

方法

对 66 个 ICU 数据进行二次分析,纳入入住 ICU 至少 24 小时的患者。采用混合效应逻辑回归模型,计算受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

在 12489 例患者中,与次日活动能力较高相关的独立因素包括:明显疼痛(校正优势比[OR],1.16;95%置信区间[CI],1.09-1.23)、记录镇静目标(OR,1.09;95% CI,1.01-1.18)、实施自主觉醒试验(OR,1.77;95% CI,1.59-1.96)、自主呼吸试验(OR,2.35;95% CI,2.14-2.58)、活动安全性筛查(OR,2.26;95% CI,2.04-2.49)和前一日的物理/职业治疗(OR,1.44;95% CI,1.30-1.59)。与次日活动能力较低相关的独立因素包括:深度镇静(OR,0.44;95% CI,0.39-0.49)、谵妄(OR,0.63;95% CI,0.59-0.69)、苯二氮䓬类药物治疗(OR,0.85;95% CI,0.79-0.92)、身体约束(OR,0.74;95% CI,0.68-0.80)和机械通气(OR,0.73;95% CI,0.68-0.78)。黑人和西班牙裔患者次日活动的可能性低于其他患者。纳入患者、实践和单位间变异的模型在预测次日早期活动表现方面具有较高的判别准确性(AUC,0.853)。

结论

多个可改变和不可改变的因素共同为次日早期活动表现提供了较好的预测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94ff/11675296/7d3c8ae844ed/nihms-2041634-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94ff/11675296/7d3c8ae844ed/nihms-2041634-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94ff/11675296/7d3c8ae844ed/nihms-2041634-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient, Practice, and Organizational Factors Associated With Early Mobility Performance in Critically Ill Adults.患者、实践和组织因素与危重症成人早期活动表现相关。
Am J Crit Care. 2024 Sep 1;33(5):324-333. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2024939.
2
Factors Associated With Spontaneous Awakening Trial and Spontaneous Breathing Trial Performance in Adults With Critical Illness: Analysis of a Multicenter, Nationwide, Cohort Study.危重症成年患者自主唤醒试验和自主呼吸试验表现的相关因素:一项多中心、全国性队列研究的分析
Chest. 2022 Sep;162(3):588-602. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.01.018. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
3
Implementing the awakening and breathing coordination, delirium monitoring/management, and early exercise/mobility bundle into everyday care: opportunities, challenges, and lessons learned for implementing the ICU Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Guidelines.实施觉醒与呼吸协调性、谵妄监测/管理以及早期运动/活动能力捆绑到日常护理中:实施 ICU 疼痛、躁动和谵妄指南的机会、挑战和经验教训。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep;41(9 Suppl 1):S116-27. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a17064.
4
Caring for Critically Ill Patients with the ABCDEF Bundle: Results of the ICU Liberation Collaborative in Over 15,000 Adults.用 ABCDEF 集束化方案关爱危重症患者:15000 多例成人患者的 ICU 解放协作研究结果。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Jan;47(1):3-14. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003482.
5
Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial.机械通气重症患者的早期物理治疗和职业治疗:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2009 May 30;373(9678):1874-82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60658-9. Epub 2009 May 14.
6
Predictors of New-Onset Physical Restraint Use in Critically Ill Adults.预测危重症成人新发生身体约束使用的因素。
Am J Crit Care. 2020 Mar 1;29(2):92-102. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2020361.
7
Variables associated with mobility levels in critically ill patients: A cohort study.与危重症患者活动水平相关的变量:一项队列研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2022 Jul;27(4):546-557. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12639. Epub 2021 May 18.
8
An Environmental Scan for Early Mobilization Practices in U.S. ICUs.美国 ICU 中早期活动实践的环境扫描。
Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2360-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001262.
9
External Validation of Two Models to Predict Delirium in Critically Ill Adults Using Either the Confusion Assessment Method-ICU or the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist for Delirium Assessment.使用意识模糊评估法-重症监护病房或重症监护谵妄筛查检查表对谵妄进行评估的两种模型对危重症成人谵妄预测的外部验证。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct;47(10):e827-e835. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003911.
10
Early Mobility Index and Patient Outcomes: A Retrospective Study in Multiple Intensive Care Units.早期活动指数与患者预后:多重症监护病房的回顾性研究。
Am J Crit Care. 2024 May 1;33(3):171-179. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2024747.

本文引用的文献

1
Mobilization and Rehabilitation Practice in ICUs During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间重症监护病房的活动与康复实践
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Sep;37(9):1256-1264. doi: 10.1177/08850666221097644. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
2
Factors Associated With Spontaneous Awakening Trial and Spontaneous Breathing Trial Performance in Adults With Critical Illness: Analysis of a Multicenter, Nationwide, Cohort Study.危重症成年患者自主唤醒试验和自主呼吸试验表现的相关因素:一项多中心、全国性队列研究的分析
Chest. 2022 Sep;162(3):588-602. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.01.018. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
3
Effects of a National Quality Improvement Collaborative on ABCDEF Bundle Implementation.
国家质量改进合作对 ABCDEF 捆绑包实施的影响。
Am J Crit Care. 2022 Jan 1;31(1):54-64. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2022768.
4
Family Caregiver Preferences and Contributions Related to Patient Care in the ICU.重症监护病房中家庭照顾者与患者护理相关的偏好及贡献
West J Nurs Res. 2022 Mar;44(3):214-226. doi: 10.1177/01939459211062954. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
5
Racial Disparities in ICU Outcomes: A Systematic Review.ICU 结局中的种族差异:系统评价。
Crit Care Med. 2022 Jan 1;50(1):1-20. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005269.
6
Physical Rehabilitation in the ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.重症监护病房中的物理康复治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar 1;50(3):375-388. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005285.
7
Variables associated with mobility levels in critically ill patients: A cohort study.与危重症患者活动水平相关的变量:一项队列研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2022 Jul;27(4):546-557. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12639. Epub 2021 May 18.
8
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Early Mobilization in the ICU: A Systematic Review.临床实践指南:ICU 早期活动。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;48(11):e1121-e1128. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004574.
9
Implementation of an Interdisciplinary AACN Early Mobility Protocol.实施跨学科 AACN 早期活动协议。
Crit Care Nurse. 2020 Aug 1;40(4):e7-e17. doi: 10.4037/ccn2020632.
10
Early Mobilization in the ICU: A Collaborative, Integrated Approach.重症监护病房中的早期活动:一种协作性综合方法。
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Apr 29;2(4):e0090. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000090. eCollection 2020 Apr.