Michele C. Balas is an associate dean of research and Dorothy Hodges Olsen Distinguished Professor of Nursing at the University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Nursing, Omaha, Nebraska.
Alai Tan is a research professor, Center for Research and Health Analytics, College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Am J Crit Care. 2022 Jan 1;31(1):54-64. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2022768.
The ABCDEF bundle (Assess, prevent, and manage pain and Delirium; Both spontaneous awakening and breathing trials; Choice of analgesia/sedation; Early mobility; and Family engagement) improves intensive care unit outcomes, but adoption into practice is poor.
To assess the effect of quality improvement collaborative participation on ABCDEF bundle performance.
This interrupted time series analysis included 20 months of bundle performance data from 15 226 adults admitted to 68 US intensive care units. Segmented regression models were used to quantify complete and individual bundle element performance changes over time and compare performance patterns before (6 months) and after (14 months) collaborative initiation.
Complete bundle performance rates were very low at baseline (<4%) but increased to 12% by the end. Complete bundle performance increased by 2 percentage points (SE, 0.9; P = .06) immediately after collaborative initiation. Each subsequent month was associated with an increase of 0.6 percentage points (SE, 0.2; P = .04). Performance rates increased significantly immediately after initiation for pain assessment (7.6% [SE, 2.0%], P = .002), sedation assessment (9.1% [SE, 3.7%], P = .02), and family engagement (7.8% [SE, 3%], P = .02) and then increased monthly at the same speed as the trend in the baseline period. Performance rates were lowest for spontaneous awakening/breathing trials and early mobility.
Quality improvement collaborative participation resulted in clinically meaningful, but small and variable, improvements in bundle performance. Opportunities remain to improve adoption of sedation, mechanical ventilation, and early mobility practices.
ABCDEF 捆绑包(评估、预防和管理疼痛和谵妄;自主唤醒和呼吸试验;选择镇痛/镇静;早期活动;以及家庭参与)可改善重症监护病房的结局,但采用情况不佳。
评估质量改进合作参与对 ABCDEF 捆绑包性能的影响。
这项中断时间序列分析包括来自 68 个美国重症监护病房的 15226 名成年人 20 个月的捆绑包绩效数据。分段回归模型用于量化随时间推移的完整和个别捆绑元素绩效变化,并比较协作启动前后(6 个月和 14 个月)的绩效模式。
基线时完整捆绑包性能率非常低(<4%),但最终增加到 12%。协作启动后立即提高了 2 个百分点(SE,0.9;P =.06)。此后每个月增加 0.6 个百分点(SE,0.2;P =.04)。启动后立即显著提高了疼痛评估(7.6%[SE,2.0%],P =.002)、镇静评估(9.1%[SE,3.7%],P =.02)和家庭参与(7.8%[SE,3%],P =.02)的绩效率,然后以与基线期相同的速度逐月增加。自发觉醒/呼吸试验和早期活动的绩效率最低。
质量改进合作参与导致捆绑包性能有临床意义但较小且变化的改善。仍有机会改善镇静、机械通气和早期活动实践的采用。