• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展和验证混合学习中室内设计专业大学生高阶思维技能(HOTS)量表。

Development and validation of a higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) scale for major students in the interior design discipline for blended learning.

机构信息

Faculty of Education, SEGI University, 47810 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.

Department of Art and Design, Zhengzhou College of Finance and Economics, Zhengzhou, 450000, Henan, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 31;14(1):20287. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70908-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-70908-3
PMID:39217173
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11365974/
Abstract

Assessing and cultivating students' HOTS are crucial for interior design education in a blended learning environment. However, current research has focused primarily on the impact of blended learning instructional strategies, learning tasks, and activities on the development of HOTS, whereas few studies have specifically addressed the assessment of these skills through dedicated scales in the context of blended learning. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive scale for assessing HOTS in interior design major students within the context of blended learning. Employing a mixed methods design, the research involved in-depth interviews with 10 education stakeholders to gather qualitative data, which informed the development of a 66-item soft skills assessment scale. The scale was administered to a purposive sample of 359 undergraduate students enrolled in an interior design program at a university in China. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were also conducted to evaluate the underlying factor structure of the scale. The findings revealed a robust four-factor model encompassing critical thinking skills, problem-solving skills, teamwork skills, and practical innovation skills. The scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.948-0.966) and satisfactory convergent and discriminant validity. This scale provides a valuable instrument for assessing and cultivating HOTS among interior design major students in blended learning environments. Future research can utilize a scale to examine the factors influencing the development of these skills and inform instructional practices in the field.

摘要

在混合式学习环境中,评估和培养学生的 HOTS(高阶思维能力)对于室内设计教育至关重要。然而,目前的研究主要集中在混合式学习教学策略、学习任务和活动对 HOTS 发展的影响上,而很少有研究专门针对通过混合式学习中的专用量表来评估这些技能。本研究旨在为混合式学习环境中的室内设计专业学生开发一种全面的 HOTS 评估量表。本研究采用混合方法设计,通过对 10 位教育利益相关者进行深入访谈收集定性数据,在此基础上开发了一个包含 66 个项目的软技能评估量表。该量表对中国一所大学室内设计专业的 359 名本科生进行了测试。还进行了探索性和验证性因素分析,以评估量表的潜在因素结构。研究结果显示,该量表具有稳健的四因素模型,涵盖了批判性思维技能、解决问题的技能、团队合作技能和实践创新技能。该量表具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha=0.948-0.966)和满意的收敛和区分效度。该量表为评估和培养混合式学习环境中室内设计专业学生的 HOTS 提供了一个有价值的工具。未来的研究可以使用该量表来检验影响这些技能发展的因素,并为该领域的教学实践提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b9/11365974/de1858ce6df0/41598_2024_70908_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b9/11365974/83f4a9f607d5/41598_2024_70908_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b9/11365974/1a5cffc3799d/41598_2024_70908_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b9/11365974/de1858ce6df0/41598_2024_70908_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b9/11365974/83f4a9f607d5/41598_2024_70908_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b9/11365974/1a5cffc3799d/41598_2024_70908_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b9/11365974/de1858ce6df0/41598_2024_70908_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) scale for major students in the interior design discipline for blended learning.发展和验证混合学习中室内设计专业大学生高阶思维技能(HOTS)量表。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 31;14(1):20287. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70908-3.
2
Nursing Undergraduate Students' Experiences and Perceptions of Blended Learning in Pediatric Nursing: A Mixed Methods Study.护理本科生对儿科护理混合式学习的体验与认知:一项混合方法研究。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Sep 10;10:23779608241274214. doi: 10.1177/23779608241274214. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
The development and validation of a questionnaire to explore medical students' learning in a blended learning environment.开发和验证一种问卷,以探索医学生在混合学习环境中的学习情况。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-03045-4.
4
Validation of undergraduate medical student script concordance test (SCT) scores on the clinical assessment of the acute abdomen.本科医学生急性腹痛临床评估脚本一致性测试(SCT)分数的验证
BMC Surg. 2016 Aug 17;16(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0173-y.
5
Perspectives of clinical nurse educators on competency-based nursing teaching in blended learning environments during nursing internship: A descriptive qualitative study.临床护士教育者对护理实习中混合学习环境下以能力为基础的护理教学的看法:一项描述性定性研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Aug;79:104027. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104027. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
6
Using the design-thinking method to develop and validate a peer evaluation scale for team-based learning (PES-TBL) for nursing students.运用设计思维方法开发并验证了一个适用于护理专业学生的团队学习同伴评估量表(PES-TBL)。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Aug;127:105849. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105849. Epub 2023 May 25.
7
Psychometric properties of the Positive Thinking Skills Scale among undergraduate nursing students.本科护生积极思维技巧量表的心理测量学特性。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2024 Jun;50:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
8
Improvement of nursing students' critical thinking skills through problem-based learning in the People's Republic of China: a quasi-experimental study.通过基于问题的学习提高中华人民共和国护理专业学生的批判性思维能力:一项准实验研究。
Nurs Health Sci. 2008 Mar;10(1):70-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2007.00373.x.
9
Evaluating the effects of action learning on the research competency of undergraduate nursing students: A mixed-methods study.评估行动学习对本科护理专业学生研究能力的影响:一项混合方法研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Sep;140:106260. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106260. Epub 2024 May 24.
10
Effects of blended learning on undergraduate nursing students' knowledge, skills, critical thinking ability and mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis.混合式学习对本科护生知识、技能、批判性思维能力和心理健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Oct;72:103786. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103786. Epub 2023 Sep 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Health anxiety and social health among health care workers and health volunteers exposed to coronavirus disease in Iran (2020): A structural equation modeling.伊朗(2020年)接触冠状病毒病的医护人员和健康志愿者的健康焦虑与社会健康:一项结构方程模型研究
J Affect Disord Rep. 2022 Apr;8:100321. doi: 10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100321. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
2
Mediating effects of self-directed learning on the relationship between critical thinking and problem-solving in student nurses attending online classes: A cross-sectional descriptive study.学生护士在线学习中自我导向学习对批判性思维与问题解决关系的中介作用:一项横断面描述性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Feb;109:105227. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105227. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
3
Imbalance Problems in Object Detection: A Review.
目标检测中的不平衡问题:综述
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2021 Oct;43(10):3388-3415. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2020.2981890. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
4
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM), and Set-ESEM: Optimal Balance Between Goodness of Fit and Parsimony.验证性因子分析(CFA)、探索性结构方程建模(ESEM)和集束-探索性结构方程建模(Set-ESEM):拟合优度与简约性之间的最佳平衡。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2020 Jan-Feb;55(1):102-119. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2019.1602503. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
5
A classification of response scale characteristics that affect data quality: a literature review.影响数据质量的反应量表特征分类:文献综述
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1523-1559. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0533-4. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
6
Foundations of teamwork and collaboration.团队合作与协作基础。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):334-348. doi: 10.1037/amp0000241.
7
An examination of the reciprocal relations between life satisfaction and social problem solving in early adolescents.对青少年早期生活满意度与社会问题解决能力之间相互关系的考察。
J Adolesc. 2016 Dec;53:141-151. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
8
Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.探索性结构方程模型:探索性和验证性因子分析最佳特征的整合。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:85-110. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700. Epub 2013 Dec 2.