Nitschke Christine, Tölle Marie, Walter Philipp, Meißner Kira, Goetz Mara, Kropidlowski Jolanthe, Berger Andreas W, Izbicki Jakob R, Nickel Felix, Hackert Thilo, Pantel Klaus, Wikman Harriet, Uzunoglu Faik G
Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Mildred Scheel Cancer Career Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Mol Oncol. 2025 Jul;19(7):2144-2153. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.13719. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are potential precursor lesions of pancreatic cancer. We assessed the efficacy of screening for KRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase (KRAS), and GNAS complex locus (GNAS) mutations in cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-using digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) and circulating epithelial cell (CEC) detection-as biomarkers for risk stratification in IPMN patients. We prospectively collected plasma samples from 25 resected patients at risk of malignant progression, and 23 under clinical surveillance. Our findings revealed KRAS mutations in 10.4% and GNAS mutations in 18.8% of the overall cohort. Among resected IPMN patients, KRAS and GNAS mutation detection rates were 16.0% and 32.0%, respectively, whereas both rates were 4.0% in conservatively managed IPMN. GNAS mutations in cfDNA were significantly more prevalent in resected IPMN (P = 0.024) compared with IPMN under surveillance. No CECs were detected. The absence of KRAS and GNAS mutations could be a reliable marker for branch duct IPMN without worrisome features. The emergence of GNAS mutations could prompt enhanced imaging surveillance. Neither the presence of established worrisome features nor GNAS or KRAS mutations appear effective in identifying high-grade dysplasia among IPMN patients.
导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMNs)是胰腺癌的潜在前驱病变。我们评估了使用数字液滴聚合酶链反应(ddPCR)筛查游离DNA(cfDNA)中KRAS原癌基因、GTP酶(KRAS)和GNAS复合位点(GNAS)突变以及检测循环上皮细胞(CEC)作为IPMN患者风险分层生物标志物的有效性。我们前瞻性地收集了25例有恶性进展风险的手术切除患者和23例接受临床监测患者的血浆样本。我们的研究结果显示,在整个队列中,KRAS突变率为10.4%,GNAS突变率为18.8%。在手术切除的IPMN患者中,KRAS和GNAS突变检测率分别为16.0%和32.0%,而在保守治疗的IPMN中,这两个率均为4.0%。与接受监测的IPMN相比,手术切除的IPMN中cfDNA的GNAS突变明显更常见(P = 0.024)。未检测到CEC。KRAS和GNAS突变的缺失可能是无不良特征的分支导管IPMN的可靠标志物。GNAS突变的出现可能提示加强影像学监测。既定的不良特征、GNAS或KRAS突变的存在似乎都不能有效地识别IPMN患者中的高级别异型增生。