Bendotti Hollie, Marshall Henry M, Gartner Coral, Ireland David, Lawler Sheleigh
Thoracic Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Australia.
Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australia.
J Health Psychol. 2025 Jun;30(7):1653-1664. doi: 10.1177/13591053241274091. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
Motivational interviewing (MI) is a common approach for smoking cessation counselling, yet little is known about the use of MI techniques in practice. This qualitative content analysis applied a published classification of content and relational MI techniques to a sample of 30 Quitline transcripts (January-March 2019) from Queensland, Australia. Overall, 36 MI techniques (94.7%) were identified at least once within the total sample. On average, 20 techniques (52.6%) were used in an individual conversation with a small difference observed between initial and follow-up calls. Techniques most frequently applied across conversations were largely relational, while techniques addressing client ambivalence/resistance were less frequently/never applied. Variability in techniques between individual initial and follow-up calls highlights the high degree of personalisation when applying MI to smoking cessation. Further investigations exploring associations of individual techniques and cessation outcomes are warranted. The classification may prove useful for assessments of fidelity for training and monitoring activities.
动机性访谈(MI)是戒烟咨询的常用方法,但对于MI技术在实际中的应用知之甚少。这项定性内容分析将已发表的内容和关系性MI技术分类应用于来自澳大利亚昆士兰州的30份戒烟热线记录样本(2019年1月至3月)。总体而言,在整个样本中至少有一次识别出36种MI技术(94.7%)。平均而言,在一次单独对话中使用了20种技术(52.6%),在初次通话和后续通话之间观察到的差异很小。在各次对话中最常应用的技术主要是关系性的,而处理客户矛盾心理/抵触情绪的技术应用较少/从未应用。个体初次通话和后续通话之间技术的差异突出了将MI应用于戒烟时的高度个性化。有必要进一步研究探索个体技术与戒烟结果之间的关联。该分类可能对培训和监测活动的保真度评估有用。