Suppr超能文献

一种志愿热情:对我们如何衡量和奖励医学教育工作者的工作的定性研究。

A Volunteer Passion: A Qualitative Look at How We Measure and Reward the Work of Medical Educators.

作者信息

Stein Cynthia J, Luff Donna, Gold Jessica M, Schwartzstein Richard M, Kesselheim Jennifer C

机构信息

Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, USA.

Department of Orthopedics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jul 31;16(7):e65849. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65849. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Background  Medical educators face many challenges, including the absence of defined roles, lack of standard career paths, and limited support in systems that generally prioritize research and clinical productivity over educational activities. Providers also teach to widely varying degrees. This study was designed to specifically examine the professional rewards and obstacles experienced by physicians who have dedicated significant energy and career focus to medical education. Methodology A phenomenological approach was used in this qualitative study. Purposeful sampling was utilized to identify medical educators from different institutions and geographical areas. Participants were categorized by gender and career stage. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and reflexive thematic analysis was used to develop themes across items and participants. Results Twenty-two medical educators were interviewed (11 males, 11 females), with an average age of 51 (range: 38-72) years. The average time from completion of training was 18 years (range: <1 to 41 years). Two main themes were constructed, which related to medical educators' career motivations and challenges: (1) Joy and purpose (subthemes: Interaction with learners, Impact, and Innovation) and (2) Everyone teaches (subthemes: Lack of recognition, Lack of reward, Malalignment of metrics) Conclusions The greatest source of motivation and satisfaction for medical educators is linked to the work itself; in addition to interactions with learners, educators derive pleasure from the innovation, collaboration, and systems thinking involved in their work. Importantly, participants also experience dissatisfaction, primarily due to a lack of recognition and reward, and metrics that do not consistently demonstrate their achievements. Participants provided examples of metrics that more accurately reflected the work of education; they identified clear benefits of academic promotion; and they highlighted significant challenges in the promotional system. The implementation of appropriate systems of measurement and reward is needed to better support the work of medical educators. Our aim should be not only to increase opportunities for satisfaction but also to reduce factors that cause frustration and limit advancement.

摘要

背景 医学教育工作者面临诸多挑战,包括角色界定不明确、缺乏标准的职业发展路径,以及在通常将研究和临床产出置于教育活动之上的体系中支持有限。教育者的教学程度也存在很大差异。本研究旨在专门考察那些将大量精力和职业重点投入医学教育的医生所体验到的职业回报与障碍。

方法 本定性研究采用现象学方法。通过目的抽样从不同机构和地理区域识别医学教育工作者。参与者按性别和职业阶段进行分类。进行了半结构化访谈,并采用反思性主题分析来提炼各项目和参与者之间的主题。

结果 共访谈了22名医学教育工作者(11名男性,11名女性),平均年龄51岁(范围:38 - 72岁)。从完成培训起的平均时间为18年(范围:<1至41年)。构建了两个主要主题,与医学教育工作者的职业动机和挑战相关:(1)喜悦与目标(子主题:与学习者的互动、影响和创新)和(2)人人皆教学(子主题:缺乏认可、缺乏奖励、指标不一致)

结论 医学教育工作者最大的动力和满足感来源与工作本身相关;除了与学习者的互动外,教育工作者还从工作中涉及的创新、协作和系统思维中获得乐趣。重要的是,参与者也体验到不满,主要原因是缺乏认可和奖励,以及指标未能始终如一地体现他们的成就。参与者提供了更准确反映教育工作的指标示例;他们确定了学术晋升的明显益处;并强调了晋升体系中的重大挑战。需要实施适当的衡量和奖励体系,以更好地支持医学教育工作者的工作。我们的目标不仅应是增加满足感的机会,还应减少导致挫折和限制晋升的因素。

相似文献

7
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.建设可持续的农村医师队伍。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.
9
Becoming outstanding educators: What do they say contributed to success?成为杰出教育者:他们说什么促成了成功?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020 Aug;25(3):655-672. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09949-7. Epub 2020 Jan 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Sources of Joy in Medical Educators as Described by the PERMA Model.《PERMA 模型描述的医学教育者的快乐之源》
Teach Learn Med. 2024 Jan-Mar;36(1):53-60. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2131556. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
4
Job Roles of the 2025 Medical Educator.2025年医学教育工作者的工作职责。
J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Jun;10(3):243-246. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00253.1.
8
Choosing a Qualitative Research Approach.选择一种定性研究方法。
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Dec;7(4):669-70. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00414.1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验