Department of Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA.
Med Educ. 2018 Jan;52(1):58-67. doi: 10.1111/medu.13379. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
This article describes the scholarly work that has addressed the fifth recommendation of the 1988 World Conference on Medical Education: 'Train teachers as educators, not content experts alone, and reward excellence in this field as fully as excellence in biomedical research or clinical practice'.
Over the past 30 years, scholars have defined the preparation needed for teaching and other educator roles, and created faculty development delivery systems to train teachers as educators. To reward the excellence of educators, scholars have expanded definitions of scholarship, defined educator roles and criteria for judging excellence, and developed educator portfolios to make achievements visible for peer review. Despite these efforts, the scholarship of discovery continues to be more highly prized and rewarded than the scholarship of teaching. These values are deeply embedded in university culture and policies.
To remedy the structural inequalities between researchers and educators, a holistic approach to rewarding the broad range of educational roles and educational scholarship is needed. This requires strong advocacy to create changes in academic rewards and support policies, provide a clear career trajectory for educators using learning analytics, expand programmes for faculty development, support health professions education scholarship units and academies of medical educators, and create mechanisms to ensure high standards for all educators.
本文描述了针对 1988 年世界医学教育大会第五项建议的学术工作:“培养教师成为教育者,而不仅仅是学科专家,并充分奖励教育领域的卓越,就像奖励生物医学研究或临床实践的卓越一样”。
在过去的 30 年里,学者们已经定义了教学和其他教育者角色所需的准备,并创建了教师发展交付系统来培养教育者。为了奖励教育者的卓越表现,学者们扩展了学术的定义,定义了教育者的角色和卓越的评判标准,并开发了教育者档案袋,以便同行评审可见他们的成就。尽管做出了这些努力,但发现的学术仍然比教学的学术更受重视和奖励。这些价值观深深植根于大学文化和政策中。
为了纠正研究人员和教育者之间的结构性不平等,需要采取全面的方法来奖励广泛的教育角色和教育学术。这需要大力倡导,以改变学术奖励和支持政策,利用学习分析为教育者提供明确的职业发展轨迹,扩大教师发展计划,支持医疗专业教育奖学金单位和医学教育者学会,并创建机制,确保所有教育者都达到高标准。