Kang Li-Min, Xu Lei, Zhang Fu-Wei, Yu Fa-Kun, Lang Li
Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Puer People's Hospital, Puer 665000, Yunnan Province, China.
Department of Outpatient, Puer People's Hospital, Puer 665000, Yunnan Province, China.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Aug 27;16(8):2612-2619. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2612.
Selective hemihepatic vascular occlusion is utilized in both right and left hemihepatectomies to preserve blood supply to the intact lobe, maintain hemodynamic stability, and mitigate surgical risks. While this technique encompasses both intrathecal and extrathecal Glissonean pedicle transection methods, there is a lack of systematic comparative reports on these two approaches.
To retrospectively analyze the clinical data of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy in our hospital to explore the feasibility, safety, and short- and long-term efficacy of extrathecal and intrathecal Glissonean pedicle transection methods in laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy.
A retrospective study was performed to analyze the clinical data of 49 HCC patients who underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy from January 2019 to December 2022 in our hospital. These patients were divided into extrathecal Glissonean pedicle transection (EGP) group ( = 24) and intrathecal Glissonean pedicle transection (IGP) group ( = 25) according to the different approaches used for selective hemihepatic vascular occlusion. The perioperative indicators, liver function indexes, complications, and follow-up findings were compared between these two groups.
The surgeries were smooth in both groups, and no perioperative death was noted. The hepatic pedicle transection time and the operation time were (16.1 ± 2.3) minutes and (129.6 ± 19.0) minutes, respectively, in the EGP group, which were significantly shorter than those in the IGP group [(25.5 ± 2.4) minutes and (184.8 ± 26.0) minutes, respectively], both < 0.01. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, time to anal exhaust, hospital stay, drain indwelling time, and postoperative liver function between the two groups (all > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications showed no significant difference [16.67% (4/24) 16.0% (4/25), > 0.05). All the 49 HCC patients were followed up after surgery (range: 11.2-53.3 months; median: 36.4 months). The overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate were not significantly different (both > 0.05).
Both extrathecal and intrathecal Glissonean pedicle approaches are effective and safe hepatic inflow occlusion techniques in laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy for HCC. However, the extrathecal approach simplifies the hepatic pedicle transection, shortens the operation time, and increases the surgical efficiency, making it a more feasible technique.
选择性半肝血管阻断术在左右半肝切除术中均有应用,以保留完整肝叶的血供,维持血流动力学稳定,并降低手术风险。虽然该技术包括鞘内和鞘外肝蒂横断方法,但缺乏关于这两种方法的系统比较报告。
回顾性分析我院接受腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的临床资料,探讨鞘外和鞘内肝蒂横断方法在腹腔镜左半肝切除术中的可行性、安全性及短期和长期疗效。
进行一项回顾性研究,分析2019年1月至2022年12月在我院接受腹腔镜左半肝切除术的49例HCC患者的临床资料。根据选择性半肝血管阻断所采用的不同方法,将这些患者分为鞘外肝蒂横断(EGP)组(n = 24)和鞘内肝蒂横断(IGP)组(n = 25)。比较两组患者的围手术期指标、肝功能指标、并发症及随访结果。
两组手术均顺利,无围手术期死亡病例。EGP组肝蒂横断时间和手术时间分别为(16.1±2.3)分钟和(129.6±19.0)分钟,均显著短于IGP组[分别为(25.5±2.4)分钟和(184.8±26.0)分钟,P均<0.01]。两组患者术中出血量、肛门排气时间、住院时间、引流管留置时间及术后肝功能比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义[16.67%(4/24)vs 16.0%(4/25),P>0.05]。49例HCC患者术后均获随访,随访时间为11.2~53.3个月,中位随访时间为36.4个月。总生存率和无病生存率比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。
鞘外和鞘内肝蒂横断方法在腹腔镜左半肝切除治疗HCC中都是有效且安全的肝血流阻断技术。然而,鞘外方法简化了肝蒂横断,缩短了手术时间,提高了手术效率,使其成为一种更可行的技术。