• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解小额信贷获取对埃塞俄比亚农村农民采用农业技术的异质性影响:一项元分析。

Understanding the heterogeneous effect of microcredit access on agricultural technology adoption by rural farmers in Ethiopia: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Shano Berhanu Kuma, Waje Samuel Semma

机构信息

Department of Agricultural Economics, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Aug 6;10(16):e35859. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35859. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35859
PMID:39220905
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11365370/
Abstract

Though the Ethiopian economy is predominantly agriculture-based, the adoption of agricultural technologies has been very low. The results of a previous study had shown that microcredit access was one of the factors affecting the adoption of agricultural technology in Ethiopia. However, its effect has not yet been analyzed at the meta-level. Therefore, this study employed meta-analysis to understand the heterogeneous effect of microcredit access among farmers adopting agricultural technologies. We used subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis to identify the heterogeneity level of credit access on technology adoption using the random-effects (RE) model. The study observed that there was a positive effect of microcredit access on agricultural technology adoption with a log odds ratio of 1.59. The subgroup analysis revealed a 93.2 % overall variation ( ) with a p-value of 0.000, signifying a significant level of microcredit access within the between-groups heterogeneity of agricultural technology adoption studies conducted in Ethiopia. Notably, this was reflected by the adoption of improved livestock technologies, fertilizers, seed varieties, multiple agriculture, and irrigation technologies, with rates of heterogeneity of 94.9 %, 94.4 %, 94.3 %, 85 %, and 73.8 %, respectively, all with a p-value of 0.000. In addition, the meta-regression analysis results indicate that household experience, distance to the market, and income are significant moderators that affect the technology adoption decisions of farmers in rural Ethiopia. These findings suggest that policymakers should focus on improving the financial facilities and extension systems for rural farmers to enhance the adoption of agricultural technologies to increase production efficiency.

摘要

尽管埃塞俄比亚经济主要以农业为基础,但农业技术的采用率一直很低。先前一项研究的结果表明,获得小额信贷是影响埃塞俄比亚农业技术采用的因素之一。然而,其影响尚未在元层面进行分析。因此,本研究采用元分析来了解获得小额信贷在采用农业技术的农民中的异质性影响。我们使用亚组分析和元回归分析,采用随机效应(RE)模型来确定信贷获取对技术采用的异质性水平。研究发现,获得小额信贷对农业技术采用有积极影响,对数优势比为1.59。亚组分析显示总体变异率为93.2%( ),p值为0.000,这表明在埃塞俄比亚进行的农业技术采用研究的组间异质性中,小额信贷获取具有显著水平。值得注意的是,这体现在改良牲畜技术、化肥、种子品种、多种农业和灌溉技术的采用上,异质性率分别为94.9%、94.4%、94.3%、85%和73.8%,p值均为0.000。此外,元回归分析结果表明,家庭经验、到市场的距离和收入是影响埃塞俄比亚农村地区农民技术采用决策的重要调节因素。这些发现表明,政策制定者应专注于改善农村农民的金融设施和推广系统,以提高农业技术的采用率,从而提高生产效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d45c/11365370/9d5821d7401d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d45c/11365370/21254cf9464d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d45c/11365370/0af76a064a9e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d45c/11365370/1f1a72d974c0/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d45c/11365370/9d5821d7401d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d45c/11365370/21254cf9464d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d45c/11365370/0af76a064a9e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d45c/11365370/1f1a72d974c0/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d45c/11365370/9d5821d7401d/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding the heterogeneous effect of microcredit access on agricultural technology adoption by rural farmers in Ethiopia: A meta-analysis.理解小额信贷获取对埃塞俄比亚农村农民采用农业技术的异质性影响:一项元分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 6;10(16):e35859. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35859. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
2
The synergistic effects of microcredit access and agricultural technology adoption on maize farmer's income in Kenya.小额信贷获取与农业技术采用对肯尼亚玉米种植农户收入的协同效应。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 6;20(1):e0316014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316014. eCollection 2025.
3
Evaluating the impact of improved maize varieties on agricultural productivity and technical efficiency among smallholder farmers in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: an empirical analysis.评估改良玉米品种对南非东开普省小农户农业生产力和技术效率的影响:一项实证分析。
GM Crops Food. 2025 Dec;16(1):272-304. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2025.2476667. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
4
Rural credit access and contract farming nexus in Ethiopia: A meta-analysis.埃塞俄比亚农村信贷获取与合同农业的关系:一项元分析。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 2;10(1):e23154. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23154. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
5
Climate variability, agricultural technologies adoption, and productivity in rural Nigeria: a plot-level analysis.尼日利亚农村地区的气候变异性、农业技术采用与生产力:地块层面分析
Agric Food Secur. 2023;12(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40066-023-00411-x. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
6
Corrigendum to "Understanding the heterogeneous effect of microcredit access on agricultural technology adoption by rural farmers in Ethiopia: A meta-analysis"[Heliyon 10(16), 30 August 2024, Article e35859].《理解小额信贷获取对埃塞俄比亚农村农民农业技术采用的异质效应:一项元分析》勘误[《Heliyon》10(16),2024年8月30日,文章编号e35859]
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 24;10(20):e36688. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36688. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
7
Measuring the poverty reduction effects of adopting agricultural technologies in rural Ethiopia: findings from an endogenous switching regression approach.衡量埃塞俄比亚农村地区采用农业技术的减贫效果:基于内生转换回归方法的研究发现
Heliyon. 2022 May 18;8(5):e09495. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09495. eCollection 2022 May.
8
Organizational support, market access, and farmers' adoption of agricultural green production technology: evidence from the main kiwifruit production areas in Shaanxi Province.组织支持、市场准入与农户农业绿色生产技术采用——来自陕西省主要猕猴桃产区的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(8):12144-12160. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-31981-3. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
9
How Capital Endowment and Ecological Cognition Affect Environment-Friendly Technology Adoption: A Case of Apple Farmers of Shandong Province, China.资本禀赋与生态认知如何影响环保技术采用——以山东省苹果种植户为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 16;18(14):7571. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147571.
10
Multiple Agricultural Production Efficiency in Horro District of Horro Guduru Wollega Zone, Western Ethiopia, Using Hierarchical-Based Cluster Data Envelopment Analysis.基于层次聚类的数据包络分析方法对埃塞俄比亚西部沃洛戈地区霍罗区的多种农业生产效率的研究。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2022 May 16;2022:4436262. doi: 10.1155/2022/4436262. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
How does livelihood capital influence the green production behaviors among professional grain farmers cultivating high-quality rice?生计资本如何影响种植优质水稻的专业粮农的绿色生产行为?
Front Nutr. 2025 May 26;12:1555488. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1555488. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Adoption of ICT4D and its determinants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.信息通信技术促进发展(ICT4D)的采用及其决定因素:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 25;10(9):e30210. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30210. eCollection 2024 May 15.
2
A systematic review of the evaluation of agricultural policies: Using prisma.农业政策评估的系统评价:采用PRISMA法
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 20;9(10):e20292. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20292. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Training at farmers training centers and its impact on crop productivity and households' income in Ethiopia: A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.
埃塞俄比亚农民培训中心的培训及其对作物生产力和家庭收入的影响:倾向得分匹配(PSM)分析
Heliyon. 2022 Jul 1;8(7):e09837. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09837. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
Site-specific agronomic information and technology adoption: A field experiment from Ethiopia.特定地点的农艺信息与技术应用:来自埃塞俄比亚的田间试验
J Dev Econ. 2022 May;156:102788. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102788.
5
Determinants of Organic Fertilizers Utilization Among Smallholder Farmers in South Gondar Zone, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚南贡德尔地区小农户有机肥料使用的影响因素
Environ Health Insights. 2022 Feb 3;16:11786302221075448. doi: 10.1177/11786302221075448. eCollection 2022.
6
Adoption of agricultural technologies in the developing world: A meta-analysis dataset of the empirical literature.发展中世界农业技术的采用:实证文献的元分析数据集。
Data Brief. 2021 Sep 20;38:107384. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107384. eCollection 2021 Oct.
7
Identifying crop research priorities based on potential economic and poverty reduction impacts: The case of cassava in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.基于潜在经济和减贫影响识别作物研究重点:以非洲、亚洲和拉丁美洲的木薯为例。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 8;13(8):e0201803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201803. eCollection 2018.
8
Impacts of extension access and cooperative membership on technology adoption and household welfare.推广服务的可及性与合作社成员身份对技术采用及家庭福利的影响。
J Rural Stud. 2017 Aug;54:223-233. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.022.
9
The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations.PRISMA 扩展声明用于报告包含健康保健干预措施网络荟萃分析的系统评价:清单和说明。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jun 2;162(11):777-84. doi: 10.7326/M14-2385.
10
A meta-analysis of bees' responses to anthropogenic disturbance.蜜蜂对人为干扰反应的荟萃分析。
Ecology. 2009 Aug;90(8):2068-76. doi: 10.1890/08-1245.1.