• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

资本禀赋与生态认知如何影响环保技术采用——以山东省苹果种植户为例。

How Capital Endowment and Ecological Cognition Affect Environment-Friendly Technology Adoption: A Case of Apple Farmers of Shandong Province, China.

机构信息

Department of Economics & Management, College of Economics & Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.

The Sixth Industry Research Institute, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 16;18(14):7571. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147571.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18147571
PMID:34300022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8305192/
Abstract

Ever-increasing global environmental issues, land degradation, and groundwater contamination may significantly impact the agricultural sector of any country. The situation worsens while the global agricultural sectors are going through the unsustainable intensification of agricultural production powered by chemical fertilizers and pesticides. This trend leads the sector to exercise environmentally friendly technology (EFT). Capital endowment and ecological cognition may significantly impact fostering farmers' adoption of environmentally friendly technology. The government also tends to change the existing policies to cope with ever-increasing challenges like pollution control, maintaining ecological balance, and supporting agricultural sectors substantially by employing ecological compensation policy. The study's main objective is to explore the impacts of farmer's ecological compensation, capital endowment, and ecological cognition for the adoption of EFT. The empirical setup of the study quantifies with survey data of 471 apple farmers from nine counties of Shandong province. The study used Heckman's two-stage model to craft the findings. The results showed that 52.02% of fruit farmers adopted two environmentally friendly technologies, and 23.99% of fruit farmers adopted three forms of environmentally friendly technologies. At the same time, we have traced that the capital endowment, planting scale, family income, and technical specialization of fruit farmers significantly impact adopting EFT. The study also revealed that understanding ecological compensation policy has a significant positive effect on adopting environmentally friendly technology. Seemingly, ecological compensation policy has a specific regulatory effect on fruit farmers' capital endowment and ecological cognition. Therefore, it is necessary to extend the demonstration facilities, training, and frequently arrange awareness-building campaigns regarding rural non-point source pollution hazards and improve the cognition level of farmers. The agriculture extension department should strengthen the agricultural value chain facilities to make farmers fully realize the importance of EFT. Government should promote and extend the supports for availing new and innovative EFT at a reasonable price. Moreover, cooperative, financial, and credit organizations need to lead for the smooth transition of EFT. The agricultural cooperatives and formal risk-taking networks should act responsibly for shaping the behavioral factors of farmers.

摘要

日益严重的全球环境问题、土地退化和地下水污染可能会对任何国家的农业部门产生重大影响。在全球农业部门正在经历由化肥和农药推动的不可持续的农业生产集约化的情况下,情况变得更加恶化。这种趋势促使该部门采用环保技术(EFT)。资本禀赋和生态认知可能会对促进农民采用环保技术产生重大影响。政府也倾向于通过采用生态补偿政策来改变现有政策,以应对污染控制、维护生态平衡和大力支持农业部门等日益增加的挑战。本研究的主要目的是探讨农民的生态补偿、资本禀赋和生态认知对采用 EFT 的影响。研究的实证设置量化了来自山东省九个县的 471 名苹果种植户的调查数据。研究使用 Heckman 的两阶段模型得出了研究结果。结果表明,52.02%的果农采用了两种环保技术,23.99%的果农采用了三种形式的环保技术。同时,我们发现果农的资本禀赋、种植规模、家庭收入和技术专业化程度对采用 EFT 有显著影响。研究还表明,对生态补偿政策的理解对采用环保技术有显著的正向影响。似乎,生态补偿政策对果农的资本禀赋和生态认知有特定的调节作用。因此,有必要扩大示范设施、培训,并经常安排有关农村非点源污染危害的宣传活动,提高农民的认知水平。农业推广部门应加强农业价值链设施,使农民充分认识到 EFT 的重要性。政府应促进和扩大对合理价格获取新的和创新的 EFT 的支持。此外,合作、金融和信贷组织需要引领 EFT 的顺利过渡。农业合作社和正式的风险承担网络应负责任地塑造农民的行为因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f26/8305192/6c6b128080da/ijerph-18-07571-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f26/8305192/6c6b128080da/ijerph-18-07571-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f26/8305192/6c6b128080da/ijerph-18-07571-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
How Capital Endowment and Ecological Cognition Affect Environment-Friendly Technology Adoption: A Case of Apple Farmers of Shandong Province, China.资本禀赋与生态认知如何影响环保技术采用——以山东省苹果种植户为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 16;18(14):7571. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147571.
2
Evaluating the roles of the farmer's cooperative for fostering environmentally friendly production technologies-a case of kiwi-fruit farmers in Meixian, China.评价农民合作社在培育环境友好型生产技术中的作用——以中国梅县猕猴桃种植户为例。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 1;301:113858. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113858. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
3
'Get a Fish' vs. 'Get a Fishing Skill': Farmers' Preferred Compensation Methods to Control Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution.“获得鱼类”与“获得捕鱼技能”:农民控制农业面源污染的首选补偿方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 5;17(7):2484. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072484.
4
Role of agricultural credit guarantee policies in encouraging green agricultural development: farmers' perspectives and responses, and the regulatory function of household capital.农业信贷担保政策在促进绿色农业发展中的作用:农民的观点与回应以及家庭资本的调节作用
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(24):66314-66327. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27161-4. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
5
The Effect of Technical Training Provided by Agricultural Cooperatives on Farmers' Adoption of Organic Fertilizers in China: Based on the Mediation Role of Ability and Perception.农业合作社提供的技术培训对中国农民采纳有机肥的影响:基于能力和感知的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 1;19(21):14277. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114277.
6
[Impacts of policy cognition on low-carbon agricultural technology adoption of farmers.].政策认知对农户低碳农业技术采用的影响。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Apr;32(4):1373-1382. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202104.024.
7
Livelihoods, Technological Constraints, and Low-Carbon Agricultural Technology Preferences of Farmers: Analytical Frameworks of Technology Adoption and Farmer Livelihoods.农民的生计、技术约束与低碳农业技术偏好:技术采纳与农民生计的分析框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 18;18(24):13364. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413364.
8
How does Internet use affect farmers' low-carbon agricultural technologies in southern China?互联网使用如何影响中国南方农民的低碳农业技术?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(6):16476-16487. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23380-3. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
9
[Regional environment, family's endowment and straw disposal behavior: A case study of dry farming areas in Gansu Province, China].[区域环境、家庭禀赋与秸秆处置行为:以中国甘肃省旱作农业区为例]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2020 Feb;31(2):563-572. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202002.001.
10
Risk cognition, agricultural cooperatives training, and farmers' pesticide overuse: Evidence from Shandong Province, China.风险认知、农业合作社培训与农户农药过度使用——来自中国山东省的证据。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;10:1032862. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1032862. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of cooperative membership in promoting agricultural green production technologies among rice farmers in rural China.合作社成员资格在中国农村稻农中推广农业绿色生产技术方面的作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 23;15(1):31044. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09181-x.
2
Impacts of chemical fertilizer reduction on grain yield: A case study of China.化肥减量对粮食产量的影响:以中国为例。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0298600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298600. eCollection 2024.
3
Study on the influence mechanism of adoption of smart agriculture technology behavior.

本文引用的文献

1
Food production in China requires intensified measures to be consistent with national and provincial environmental boundaries.中国的粮食生产需要采取强化措施,以符合国家和省级的环境界限。
Nat Food. 2020 Sep;1(9):572-582. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-00143-2. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
2
Innovative management programme reduces environmental impacts in Chinese vegetable production.创新管理方案降低中国蔬菜生产中的环境影响。
Nat Food. 2021 Jan;2(1):47-53. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-00199-0. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
3
Gains or losses? A quantitative estimation of environmental and economic effects of an ecological compensation policy.
采用智能农业技术行为的影响机制研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 26;13(1):8554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35091-x.
4
Farmers' response to maize production risks in Cameroon: An application of the criticality risk matrix model.喀麦隆农民对玉米生产风险的应对措施:关键风险矩阵模型的应用
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 7;9(4):e15124. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15124. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Regional differences and threshold effects of labor transfer affecting the technical efficiency of China's agricultural industry: A case study of the apple industry.劳动力转移对中国农业技术效率的影响的区域差异和门槛效应:以苹果产业为例。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 2;18(2):e0278348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278348. eCollection 2023.
6
Acceptance Intention and Behavioral Response to Soil-Testing Formula Fertilization Technology: An Empirical Study of Agricultural Land in Shaanxi Province.接受意愿与土壤测试配方施肥技术的行为反应:陕西省农用地的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 4;20(2):951. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20020951.
7
Factors affecting the adoption of green prevention and control techniques by family farms: Evidence from Henan province of China.影响家庭农场采用绿色防控技术的因素:来自中国河南省的证据。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 22;13:1015802. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015802. eCollection 2022.
8
A model of extended technology acceptance for behavioral intention toward EVs with gender as a moderator.以性别为调节变量的电动汽车行为意向扩展技术接受模型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 14;13:1080414. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1080414. eCollection 2022.
9
Pro-Environmental Behavior: Examining the Role of Ecological Value Cognition, Environmental Attitude, and Place Attachment among Rural Farmers in China.亲环境行为:中国农村农民的生态价值认知、环境态度和地方依恋的作用研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 18;19(24):17011. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192417011.
10
What Influences Farmers' Adoption of Soil Testing and Formulated Fertilization Technology in Black Soil Areas? An Empirical Analysis Based on Logistic-ISM Model.什么因素影响了黑土区农民对测土配方施肥技术的采用?基于 Logistic-ISM 模型的实证分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15682. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315682.
得失?生态补偿政策的环境和经济影响的定量评估。
Ecol Appl. 2021 Jul;31(5):e02341. doi: 10.1002/eap.2341. Epub 2021 May 25.
4
Technologies to deliver food and climate security through agriculture.通过农业实现食物和气候安全的技术。
Nat Plants. 2021 Mar;7(3):250-255. doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00877-2. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
5
Farm Households' Adoption of Climate-smart Practices in Subsistence Agriculture: Evidence from Northern Togo.农户对生计农业中气候智能型实践的采用:来自多哥北部的证据。
Environ Manage. 2021 May;67(5):949-962. doi: 10.1007/s00267-021-01436-3. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
6
Natural solutions for agricultural productivity.提高农业生产力的天然解决方案。
Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7837):S58-S59. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-03445-4.
7
Character strengths and sustainable technology adoption by smallholder farmers.小农户的性格优势与可持续技术采用
Heliyon. 2020 Aug 19;6(8):e04694. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04694. eCollection 2020 Aug.
8
Cognition of agriculture waste and payments for a circular agriculture model in Central China.对农业废弃物的认知与华中地区循环农业模式的支付意愿。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 2;10(1):10826. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67358-y.
9
What drives smallholder farmers' willingness to pay for a new farm technology? Evidence from an experimental auction in Kenya.是什么驱动了小农户购买新农业技术的意愿?来自肯尼亚一次实验性拍卖的证据。
Food Policy. 2019 May;85:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.03.005.
10
Who cares what parents think or do? Observational learning and experience-based learning through communication in rice farmers' willingness to adopt sustainable agricultural technologies in Hubei Province, China.谁在乎父母的想法和做法呢?在中国湖北省,通过农民之间的交流进行观察学习和基于经验的学习,可以提高农民采用可持续农业技术的意愿。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Apr;26(12):12522-12536. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04609-0. Epub 2019 Mar 8.