• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估中国在职高校教育工作者的数字能力:一项系统的文献综述

Assessing the digital competence of in-service university educators in China: A systematic literature review.

作者信息

Lan Huihui, Bailey Richard, Tan Wee Hoe

机构信息

Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, China.

Faculty of Social Sciences and Liberal Arts, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Aug 6;10(16):e35675. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35675. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35675
PMID:39220952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11365341/
Abstract

Rapid growth has been witnessed in digital technologies, resulting in significant productive changes in communication and information technology-oriented practices in different fields. Hybrid teaching or blended learning has gained progressively widespread acceptance in the educational process, and concerns about teachers' information and communication technology (ICT) competence or digital competence have become prevalent. This study adopts a systematic review to interpret and analyse the relevant research findings, aiming to systematically investigate the existing models and paradigms of ICT competence or digital capacities and to understand further how these models and paradigms are applied specifically within the context of Chinese universities. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 out of 801 candidate studies were accessed from Web of Science, Scopus and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases. The findings indicate that the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) and the National Educational Technology Guides for Teachers in Higher Education (CETG) are frequently used to evaluate college educators' digital proficiency or ICT capability in China. Educators' demographic characteristics, self-efficacy, external factors such as institutional policies and the availability of infrastructure and training collectively influence how digital teaching is integrated within Chinese higher education institutions. By conducting a systematic review of research trends and the critical factors affecting the digital competence of faculty in Chinese universities, this study aims to equip policymakers and educators with a deeper understanding of how to prepare for educational shifts in the digital era and thereby ensure the sustainability of professional development.

摘要

数字技术发展迅速,给不同领域中以通信和信息技术为导向的实践带来了重大的生产变革。混合式教学或混合学习在教育过程中逐渐得到广泛认可,对教师信息通信技术(ICT)能力或数字能力的关注也日益普遍。本研究采用系统综述的方法来解读和分析相关研究结果,旨在系统地调查ICT能力或数字能力的现有模型和范式,并进一步了解这些模型和范式在中国大学背景下是如何具体应用的。根据纳入和排除标准,从Web of Science、Scopus和中国知网(CNKI)数据库的801项候选研究中筛选出12项进行分析。研究结果表明,技术教学内容知识(TPACK)和《高等学校教师教育技术指南》(CETG)在中国常被用于评估高校教育工作者的数字素养或ICT能力。教育工作者的人口统计学特征、自我效能感、机构政策等外部因素以及基础设施和培训的可获得性共同影响着数字教学在中国高等教育机构中的整合方式。通过对中国大学教师数字能力的研究趋势和关键影响因素进行系统综述,本研究旨在使政策制定者和教育工作者更深入地理解如何为数字时代的教育变革做好准备,从而确保专业发展的可持续性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc0f/11365341/b0839a9c4def/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc0f/11365341/0f223f656c75/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc0f/11365341/522e106521e7/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc0f/11365341/b0839a9c4def/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc0f/11365341/0f223f656c75/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc0f/11365341/522e106521e7/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc0f/11365341/b0839a9c4def/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the digital competence of in-service university educators in China: A systematic literature review.评估中国在职高校教育工作者的数字能力:一项系统的文献综述
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 6;10(16):e35675. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35675. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
2
Does teacher's data literacy and digital teaching competence influence empowering students in the classroom? Evidence from China.教师的数据素养和数字教学能力是否会影响课堂上对学生的赋能?来自中国的证据。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023;28(3):2845-2867. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11274-3. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
3
Exploring factors influencing pre-service and in-service teachers´ perception of digital competencies in the Chinese region of Anhui.探究影响中国安徽省职前和在职教师对数字能力认知的因素。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(9):12469-12494. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11085-6. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
4
The effect of teacher self-efficacy, online pedagogical and content knowledge, and emotion regulation on teacher digital burnout: a mediation model.教师自我效能感、在线教学与内容知识以及情绪调节对教师数字倦怠的影响:一个中介模型
BMC Psychol. 2024 Jan 26;12(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01540-z.
5
University teachers' perceptions of ICT-based teaching to construct knowledge for effective classroom interaction in the context of TPACK model.在TPACK模型背景下,大学教师对基于信息通信技术的教学以构建知识实现有效课堂互动的认知。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 24;10(8):e28577. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28577. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
6
The Digital Gender Gap in Teacher Education: The TPACK Framework for the 21st Century.教师教育中的数字性别差距:21世纪的TPACK框架。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021 Oct 25;11(4):1333-1349. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11040097.
7
Predicting Preservice Science Teachers' TPACK through ICT usage.通过信息通信技术的使用预测职前科学教师的TPACK
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023 Feb 16:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11657-0.
8
Technology Integration in Higher Education During COVID-19: An Assessment of Online Teaching Competencies Through Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Model.新冠疫情期间高等教育中的技术整合:通过技术教学内容知识模型对在线教学能力的评估
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 26;12:736522. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736522. eCollection 2021.
9
Unravelling EFL teachers' mastery of TPACK: Technological pedagogical and content knowledge in writing classes.解析英语外语教师对TPACK的掌握情况:写作课中的技术教学内容知识
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 15;9(6):e17348. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17348. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
An empirical study on English preservice teachers' digital competence regarding ICT self-efficacy, collegial collaboration and infrastructural support.一项关于职前英语教师在信息通信技术自我效能感、同事协作和基础设施支持方面数字能力的实证研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 1;9(9):e19538. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19538. eCollection 2023 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
First Systematic Review on Health Communication Using the CiteSpace Software in China: Exploring Its Research Hotspots and Frontiers.第一篇运用 CiteSpace 软件进行健康传播的系统综述在中国:探索其研究热点和前沿。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 9;18(24):13008. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413008.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:178-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
3
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.
PRISMA 2020 解释和说明:系统评价报告的更新指南和范例。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.
4
A Guide for Systematic Reviews: PRISMA.系统评价指南:PRISMA
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar;57(1):57-58. doi: 10.5152/tao.2019.4058. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
5
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.系统评价或范围综述?在选择系统评价或范围综述方法时,作者的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
6
The Purpose, Process, and Methods of Writing a Literature Review.撰写文献综述的目的、过程与方法。
AORN J. 2016 Mar;103(3):265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2016.01.016.
7
An introduction to systematic reviews and meta-analyses in health care.医疗保健中的系统评价和荟萃分析简介。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012 May;32(3):174-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00901.x.
8
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. Epub 2009 Jul 20.