Deshmukh Ashwin, Nair Abhishek, Devarmani Shivappa, Barosani Ankit
Orthopaedics, Dr. Dnyandeo Yashwantrao Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. Dnyandeo Yashwantrao Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Aug 1;16(8):e65918. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65918. eCollection 2024 Aug.
The chronic and incapacitating condition of infected non-union of the long bones continues to be a challenging issue for surgeons in terms of efficient and economical treatment. A number of variables, such as open fractures, soft tissue or bone loss, infection following internal fixation, persistent osteomyelitis with pathologic fractures, and surgical debridement of infected bone, can result in infected non-unions. An infected non-union is typically treated in two stages. To transform an infected non-union into an aseptic non-union, the initial step involves debridement, either with or without the insertion of antibiotic cement beads and systemic antibiotics. In order to ensure stability, external or internal fixation - with or without bone grafting - is carried out in the second stage. There is a wealth of literature supporting the use of antibiotic-impregnated cement-coated intramedullary (IM) nailing for infected non-union of tibia and femur fractures. In contrast to cement beads, the cement nail offers stability throughout the fracture site, and osseous stability is crucial for the treatment of an infected non-union. When using antibiotics for this purpose, they should possess unique qualities, including low allergenicity, heat stability, and a broad spectrum of activity. The most commonly utilised medication has been gentamicin, which is followed by vancomycin. Furthermore, it has been discovered that solid nails are more resistant to local infection than cannulated IM nails. In this case study, the patient was treated with a solid IM nail that had a specially designed slot on its exterior surface for the application of cement impregnated with antibiotics. In conclusion, an easy, affordable, and successful treatment for infected non-union of the tibia is antibiotic cement-impregnated nailing. It has strong patient compliance and removes the problems associated with external fixators, which makes it superior to them. A few benefits of this approach are early weight-bearing, stabilisation of the fracture, local antibiotic treatment, and the potential for accelerated rehabilitation. Additionally, lowering the requirement for continuous antibiotic medication may lessen the chance that antibiotic resistance may arise.
对于外科医生而言,长骨感染性骨不连的慢性致残状况在高效且经济的治疗方面仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题。许多因素,如开放性骨折、软组织或骨质缺损、内固定后感染、伴有病理性骨折的持续性骨髓炎以及感染骨的手术清创等,都可能导致感染性骨不连。感染性骨不连通常分两个阶段进行治疗。为了将感染性骨不连转变为无菌性骨不连,第一步是进行清创,可选择插入或不插入抗生素骨水泥珠及全身使用抗生素。为确保稳定性,第二阶段进行外固定或内固定,可选择或不选择植骨。有大量文献支持使用抗生素浸渍骨水泥涂层的髓内钉治疗胫骨和股骨骨折的感染性骨不连。与骨水泥珠相比,骨水泥钉在整个骨折部位提供稳定性,而骨稳定性对于感染性骨不连的治疗至关重要。为此目的使用抗生素时,它们应具备独特特性,包括低致敏性、热稳定性和广谱活性。最常用的药物是庆大霉素,其次是万古霉素。此外,已发现实心钉比空心髓内钉更能抵抗局部感染。在本病例研究中,患者接受了一种实心髓内钉治疗,该髓内钉外表面有专门设计的狭槽用于涂抹浸渍抗生素的骨水泥。总之,抗生素骨水泥浸渍髓内钉是一种简便、经济且成功的治疗胫骨感染性骨不连的方法。它具有很强的患者依从性,消除了与外固定器相关的问题,使其优于外固定器。这种方法的一些优点包括早期负重、骨折稳定、局部抗生素治疗以及加速康复的潜力。此外,降低持续使用抗生素药物的需求可能会减少产生抗生素耐药性的机会。