Pradhan Chetan, Patil Atul, Puram Chetan, Attarde Dheeraj, Sancheti Parag, Shyam Ashok
Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation, Shivajinagar, Pune India.
Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation, Shivajinagar, Pune India; Indian Orthopaedic Research Group, Thane, India.
Injury. 2017 Aug;48 Suppl 2:S66-S71. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(17)30497-7.
Infected non-union is complex and debilitating disorder affecting orthopaedic surgeon and patient in terms of cost and time. Many methods are described in the literature for treatment of infected non-union. Local high concentration of antibiotic and mechanical stability of antibiotic cement impregnated intramedullary nail (ACIIN) proves cost and time effective. Recently it was suggested that ACIIN can achieve both union and infection control in infected non-unions with bone gap less than 4cm. The aim of our study was to investigate this hypothesis and study the outcome of antibiotic cement impregnated intramedullary nail in term of both infection control and osseous union.
We retrospectively studied 21 patients with infected diaphyseal femoral non-union. Inclusion criteria were bone gap less than 4cm after debridement and more than 1 year follow-up of the case. ACIIN prepared using K nail was used as primary procedure after adequate debridement. Infection control and osseous union was judged on the basis of clinical, radiological and haematological parameters. All patients were followed up with an average follow-up of 20.23±3.65 months (range 14-28 months).
Infection control was achieved in all 21 patients at end of 12 months follow-up, out of which 16 patients had osseous union and infection control without any secondary procedure. Of the remaining 5 patients: two patients had good infection control but had broken ACCIN due to non-compliance to weight bearing protocol. One patient underwent exchange nailing and plate augmentation whilst the other underwent simple exchange nailing, One more patient who had infection control but had persistent non-union had to undergo exchange nailing and augmented plating to achieve union. One other patient required debridement and implant removal and attained union and fifth patient required two additional debridements to control infection after which the fracture united. Apart from above 5 cases there were two further complications of knee stiffness.
In infected non-union with bone gap less than 4cm, ACIIN can achieve both infection control and osseous union in significant number of cases. All such cases should be primarily operated with aim to achieve this outcome and use of thicker nail and ensuring proper compliance from patients regarding weight bearing will improve the outcomes.
感染性骨不连是一种复杂且使人衰弱的病症,在成本和时间方面给骨科医生和患者都带来了困扰。文献中描述了许多治疗感染性骨不连的方法。局部高浓度抗生素以及抗生素骨水泥填充髓内钉(ACIIN)的机械稳定性被证明具有成本效益且节省时间。最近有人提出,ACIIN可以使骨间隙小于4厘米的感染性骨不连实现骨愈合和感染控制。我们研究的目的是调查这一假设,并从感染控制和骨愈合方面研究抗生素骨水泥填充髓内钉的治疗效果。
我们回顾性研究了21例股骨干感染性骨不连患者。纳入标准为清创后骨间隙小于4厘米且病例随访时间超过1年。在充分清创后,使用K型钉制备的ACIIN作为主要治疗方法。根据临床、放射学和血液学参数判断感染控制和骨愈合情况。所有患者均接受随访,平均随访时间为20.23±3.65个月(范围为14 - 28个月)。
在12个月随访结束时,所有21例患者的感染均得到控制,其中16例患者实现了骨愈合且感染得到控制,无需任何二次手术。其余5例患者中:2例患者感染控制良好,但因未遵守负重方案导致ACCIN断裂。1例患者接受了交锁髓内钉更换和钢板加强术,另1例患者接受了单纯交锁髓内钉更换术。还有1例感染得到控制但持续存在骨不连的患者不得不接受交锁髓内钉更换和钢板加强术以实现骨愈合。另1例患者需要清创和取出植入物并实现了骨愈合,第5例患者需要额外进行两次清创以控制感染,之后骨折愈合。除了上述5例病例外,还有另外两例膝关节僵硬的并发症。
在骨间隙小于4厘米的感染性骨不连中,ACIIN在大量病例中可以实现感染控制和骨愈合。所有此类病例都应首先进行手术以实现这一治疗效果,使用更粗的髓内钉并确保患者在负重方面严格遵守医嘱将改善治疗效果。