• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调动关于城市变化的知识以促进公平与可持续性:开展“变化故事”这项多国跨学科研究。

Mobilizing knowledge about urban change for equity and sustainability: developing 'Change Stories', a multi-country transdisciplinary study.

作者信息

Pineo Helen, Álvarez Rivadulla María José, Borde Elis, Caiaffa Waleska Teixeira, Dianati Vafa, Ellis Geraint, Fleischer Friederike, Hurtado Tarazona Adriana, Sarmiento Olga L, Martire Agustina, Montero Sergio, Moore Gemma, Morley Rebecca, Prasad Aarathi

机构信息

Department of Urban Design and Planning, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98105, USA.

Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, Bartlett School of Environment, Energy and Resources, University College London, London, England, WC1H 0NN, UK.

出版信息

Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Apr 24;9:218. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21180.1. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21180.1
PMID:39221443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11364977/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health-focused research funders increasingly support multi-country research partnerships that study health, urban development and equity in global settings. To develop new knowledge that benefits society, these grants require researchers to integrate diverse knowledges and data, and to manage research-related aspects of coloniality, such as power imbalances and epistemic injustices. We conducted research to develop a transdisciplinary study proposal with partners in multiple middle and high income countries, aiming to embed equity into the methodology and funding model.

METHODS

Parallel to literature review, we used participatory and social research methods to identify case study cities for our primary study and to inform our study design. We conducted semi-structured interviews with informed and consented sustainable urban development experts in the USA (n=23). We co-developed our research approach with our global advisory group (n=14) and conducted a participatory workshop (n=30) to identify case study sites, also informed by conversations with international academic experts in sustainable development (n=27).

RESULTS

Through literature review we found that there is a need to study the contextual pre-conditions of urban transformation, the influence of coloniality on understandings of how cities can change and the failure of standard development practices to meet the needs of all residents and the planet. Through expert input and literature we found that decolonial and storytelling methods may help us show the complexities behind stories of urban transformation, particularly the role of marginalized populations in creating long-term change.

CONCLUSIONS

There are multiple benefits of conducting research to develop an equitably designed multi-country research collaboration. We built new partnerships and co-developed our research approach, creating new understanding of diverse collaborators' disciplinary perspectives and institutional requirements. By investigating the informational needs of U.S. sustainable development actors and designing our study to meet these needs, we have increased the likelihood that our research will create impact.

摘要

背景

关注健康的研究资助者越来越多地支持多国研究伙伴关系,这些伙伴关系在全球背景下研究健康、城市发展和公平问题。为了创造造福社会的新知识,这些资助要求研究人员整合不同的知识和数据,并管理与殖民性相关的研究方面,如权力不平衡和认知不公正。我们开展了一项研究,与多个中高收入国家的合作伙伴共同制定一项跨学科研究提案,旨在将公平融入方法和资助模式。

方法

在进行文献综述的同时,我们使用参与式和社会研究方法来确定主要研究的案例城市,并为研究设计提供信息。我们对美国23名知情并同意参与的可持续城市发展专家进行了半结构化访谈。我们与全球咨询小组(14人)共同制定了研究方法,并举办了一次参与式研讨会(30人)以确定案例研究地点,与可持续发展领域的国际学术专家(27人)的对话也为研讨会提供了信息。

结果

通过文献综述,我们发现有必要研究城市转型的背景前提条件、殖民性对理解城市如何变化的影响,以及标准发展实践未能满足所有居民和地球需求的问题。通过专家意见和文献,我们发现去殖民化和叙事方法可能有助于我们揭示城市转型故事背后的复杂性,特别是边缘化群体在创造长期变革中的作用。

结论

开展研究以制定公平设计的多国研究合作有诸多益处。我们建立了新的伙伴关系并共同制定了研究方法,对不同合作者的学科观点和机构要求有了新的认识。通过调查美国可持续发展行为体的信息需求并设计研究以满足这些需求,我们增加了研究产生影响的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c44/11364977/0dddba660235/wellcomeopenres-9-23425-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c44/11364977/842db54b49e6/wellcomeopenres-9-23425-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c44/11364977/0dddba660235/wellcomeopenres-9-23425-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c44/11364977/842db54b49e6/wellcomeopenres-9-23425-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c44/11364977/0dddba660235/wellcomeopenres-9-23425-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Mobilizing knowledge about urban change for equity and sustainability: developing 'Change Stories', a multi-country transdisciplinary study.调动关于城市变化的知识以促进公平与可持续性:开展“变化故事”这项多国跨学科研究。
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Apr 24;9:218. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21180.1. eCollection 2024.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
5
How equitable is the conduct of public health research? Findings across case studies from India and Australia.公共卫生研究的开展有多公平?来自印度和澳大利亚的案例研究结果
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Aug 8;24(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02593-1.
6
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
7
Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响照顾者和青少年对青少年人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的看法及做法的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):CD013430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013430.pub2.
8
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
9
The ultimate power play in research - partnering with patients, partnering with power.研究中的终极权力博弈——与患者合作,与权力合作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 17;11(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00745-9.
10
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Sustainability and Equity in Urban Development (S&EUD): A Content Analysis of "Bright Spots" from the Accelerating City Equity (ACE) Project.城市发展中的可持续性与公平性(S&EUD):对加速城市公平性(ACE)项目中“亮点”的内容分析
Sustainability. 2023 May;15(9). doi: 10.3390/su15097318. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
2
Striving towards true equity in global health: A checklist for bilateral research partnerships.追求全球卫生领域的真正公平:双边研究伙伴关系清单
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jan 18;3(1):e0001418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001418. eCollection 2023.
3
"We're already doing this work": ethical research with community-based organizations.
“我们已经在做这项工作了”:基于社区组织的伦理研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Sep 2;22(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01713-7.
4
Historical Redlining Is Associated with Present-Day Air Pollution Disparities in U.S. Cities.历史上的红线划定与美国城市当今的空气污染差异有关。
Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2022 Apr 12;9(4):345-350. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c01012. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
5
Association of historic redlining and present-day health in Baltimore.巴尔的摩的历史性红线划定与当今健康状况的关联。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 19;17(1):e0261028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261028. eCollection 2022.
6
Storytelling as a Research Tool Used to Explore Insights and as an Intervention in Public Health: A Systematic Narrative Review.作为研究工具的叙事研究:用于探索洞察和公共卫生干预的系统叙事综述。
Int J Public Health. 2021 Nov 2;66:1604262. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2021.1604262. eCollection 2021.
7
Developing a programme theory for a transdisciplinary research collaboration: Complex Urban Systems for Sustainability and Health.为跨学科研究合作制定项目理论:可持续发展与健康的复杂城市系统
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Jul 14;6:35. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16542.2. eCollection 2021.
8
Disproportionate exposure to urban heat island intensity across major US cities.美国主要城市城市热岛强度的不成比例暴露。
Nat Commun. 2021 May 25;12(1):2721. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22799-5.
9
A new transdisciplinary research model to investigate and improve the health of the public.一种新的跨学科研究模式,旨在调查和改善公众健康。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Apr 15;36(2):481-492. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa125.
10
Transforming cities for sustainability: A health perspective.城市可持续发展转型:健康视角。
Environ Int. 2021 Feb;147:106366. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106366. Epub 2021 Jan 7.