Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Scottish HPV Reference Laboratory, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
J Med Virol. 2024 Sep;96(9):e29881. doi: 10.1002/jmv.29881.
While HC2 and GP5+/6+ PCR-EIA were pivotal in test validation of new HPV assays, they represent the first generation of comparator tests based upon technologies that are not in widespread use anymore. In the current guideline, criteria for second-generation comparator tests are presented that include more detailed resolution of HPV genotypes. Second-generation comparator tests should preferentially target only the 12 genotypes classified as carcinogenic (IARC-group I), and show consistent non-inferior sensitivity for CIN2+ and CIN3+ and specificity for ≤CIN1 compared to one of the first-generations comparators, in at least three validation studies using benchmarks of 0.95 for relative sensitivity and 0.98 for relative specificity. Validation should take into account used storage media and other sample handling procedures. Meta-analyses were conducted to identify the assays that fulfill these stringent criteria. Four tests fulfilled the new criteria: (1) RealTime High-Risk HPV Test (Abbott), (2) Cobas-4800 HPV test (Roche Molecular System), (3) Onclarity HPV Assay (BD Diagnostics), and (4) Anyplex II HPV HR Detection (Seegene), each evaluated in three to six studies. Whereas the four assays target 14 carcinogenic genotypes, the first two identify separately HPV16 and 18, the third assay identifies five types separately and the fourth identifies all the types separately.
虽然 HC2 和 GP5+/6+ PCR-EIA 在新 HPV 检测方法的验证中起关键作用,但它们代表了第一代基于不再广泛使用的技术的比较检测方法。在当前的指南中,提出了第二代比较检测方法的标准,包括更详细的 HPV 基因型分辨率。第二代比较检测方法应优先仅针对被分类为致癌的 12 种基因型(IARC 组 I),并且与第一代比较检测方法之一相比,在至少三项验证研究中,对于 CIN2+和 CIN3+的一致性非劣效性敏感性和对于≤CIN1 的特异性,对于 0.95 的相对敏感性和 0.98 的相对特异性的基准。验证应考虑使用的存储介质和其他样本处理程序。进行了荟萃分析以确定符合这些严格标准的检测方法。有四项检测方法符合新的标准:(1)实时高风险 HPV 检测(雅培),(2)Cobas-4800 HPV 检测(罗氏分子系统),(3)Onclarity HPV 检测(BD 诊断),和(4)Anyplex II HPV HR 检测(Seegene),每种检测方法都在三到六项研究中进行了评估。虽然这四种检测方法针对 14 种致癌基因型,但前两种方法分别识别 HPV16 和 18,第三种方法分别识别五种类型,第四种方法则分别识别所有类型。