• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴氏指数和功能独立性测量的可推广性:残疾测量对项目功能差异的稳健性。

Generalisability of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure: robustness of disability measures to Differential Item Functioning.

作者信息

Caronni Antonio, Scarano Stefano

机构信息

Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.

Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Apr;47(8):2134-2145. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2391554. Epub 2024 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2391554
PMID:39221560
Abstract

PURPOSE

Differential Item Functioning (DIF), an item malfunctioning, causes Differential Test Functioning (DTF), thus biasing questionnaire measures. The current study evaluates the relationship between DIF and DTF for the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure, likely the most used disability measures. The aim is to understand under which conditions DIF can be ignored as its DTF is negligible.

METHODS

A simulation study was run. Disability measures were obtained for the Barthel Index and FIM motor domain using Rasch analysis with previously published item calibrations. Several DIF scenarios have been assessed. DTF was tolerable if ≤0.50 logits.

RESULTS

Simulations showed that the larger the DIF, the larger the DTF and that, keeping the overall DIF constant, the total number of items with DIF does not affect DTF. DIF of the items with the lowest or highest calibrations is the most dangerous. The DIF of central items should be so massive to matter in DTF terms that it is unlikely to happen in practice. The FIM robustness to DIF is better than that of the Barthel Index.

CONCLUSIONS

The FIM and the Barthel Index show remarkable robustness to DIF. Thanks to this feature, sample invariant, generalisable disability measures are available.

摘要

目的

项目功能差异(DIF)作为一种项目故障,会导致测试功能差异(DTF),从而使问卷测量产生偏差。本研究评估了Barthel指数和功能独立性测量这两种可能是最常用的残疾测量方法中DIF与DTF之间的关系。目的是了解在哪些情况下,由于DTF可忽略不计,DIF可以被忽略。

方法

进行了一项模拟研究。使用Rasch分析和先前发表的项目校准,获得了Barthel指数和FIM运动领域的残疾测量结果。评估了几种DIF情况。如果DTF≤0.50对数单位,则认为是可容忍的。

结果

模拟结果表明,DIF越大,DTF越大,并且在总体DIF保持不变的情况下,存在DIF的项目总数不会影响DTF。校准值最低或最高的项目的DIF最危险。中心项目的DIF要大到在DTF方面产生影响,在实际中不太可能发生。FIM对DIF的稳健性优于Barthel指数。

结论

FIM和Barthel指数对DIF表现出显著的稳健性。由于这一特性,可以获得样本不变、可推广的残疾测量方法。

相似文献

1
Generalisability of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure: robustness of disability measures to Differential Item Functioning.巴氏指数和功能独立性测量的可推广性:残疾测量对项目功能差异的稳健性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Apr;47(8):2134-2145. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2391554. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
2
Assessing the equivalence of Web-based and paper-and-pencil questionnaires using differential item and test functioning (DIF and DTF) analysis: a case of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ).使用基于网络的和纸质问卷的等效性评估,采用不同项目和测试功能(DIF 和 DTF)分析:以四维度症状问卷(4DSQ)为例。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1191-1200. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1816-5. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
3
Cross-cultural validity of the German version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-G)-a Rasch model application.《残疾儿童评定量表德文版(PEDI-G)的跨文化效度——拉施模型应用》
Child Care Health Dev. 2017 Jan;43(1):48-58. doi: 10.1111/cch.12401. Epub 2016 Sep 4.
4
Assessing and adjusting for cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation scales through differential item functioning within the framework of the Rasch model: the PRO-ESOR project.在拉施模型框架内,通过项目功能差异评估和调整损伤与活动受限量表的跨文化效度:PRO-ESOR项目
Med Care. 2004 Jan;42(1 Suppl):I37-48. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000103529.63132.77.
5
Differential item functioning impact in a modified version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷修订版中的项目功能差异影响
Qual Life Res. 2007 Aug;16(6):981-90. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9200-x. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
6
Equating activities of daily living outcome measures: the Functional Independence Measure and the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index.日常生活活动结果测量指标的等效性:功能独立性测量与韩国版改良巴氏指数。
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Jan;40(2):217-224. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1247468. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
7
Establishing score equivalence of the Functional Independence Measure motor scale and the Barthel Index, utilising the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and Rasch measurement theory.利用国际功能、残疾和健康分类以及 Rasch 测量理论,确立功能独立性测量运动量表和巴氏指数的评分等效性。
J Rehabil Med. 2017 May 16;49(5):416-422. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2225.
8
Activities of daily living measurement after ischemic stroke: Rasch analysis of the modified Barthel Index.日常生活活动测量在缺血性脑卒中后的应用:改良巴氏指数的 Rasch 分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Mar 5;100(9):e24926. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024926.
9
Using Rasch analysis to compare the psychometric properties of the Short Form 36 physical function score and the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index in patients with psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.运用拉施分析比较银屑病关节炎和类风湿关节炎患者的简明健康状况调查量表身体功能评分与健康评估问卷残疾指数的心理测量学特性。
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Jun 15;57(5):723-9. doi: 10.1002/art.22770.
10
Developing a short-form version of the HIV Disability Questionnaire (SF-HDQ) for use in clinical practice: a Rasch analysis.开发用于临床实践的 HIV 残障问卷(SF-HDQ)简短版:一项 Rasch 分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jan 6;19(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01643-2.

引用本文的文献

1
From surgery to recovery: Measuring success through quality of life and functional improvements after cardiac surgery.从手术到康复:通过心脏手术后的生活质量和功能改善来衡量成功
World J Cardiol. 2025 Feb 26;17(2):100213. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i2.100213.