• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索业余运动员的综合运动能力得分与CrossFit®公开赛表现之间的关系:一项涉及体脂百分比、有氧能力、肌肉力量和局部肌肉耐力的单一测量。

Exploring the relationship between Total Athleticism score and CrossFit® Open Performance in amateur athletes: single measure involving body fat percentage, aerobic capacity, muscle power and local muscle endurance.

作者信息

Tibana Ramires Alsamir, Dominski Fábio Hech, Andrade Alexandro, De Sousa Nuno Manuel Frade, Voltarelli Fabricio Azevedo, Neto Ivo Vieira de Sousa

机构信息

Graduate Program in Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá.

Laboratory of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Human Movement Sciences Graduate Program, College of Health and Sport Science of the Santa Catarina State University (UDESC), Florianópolis.

出版信息

Eur J Transl Myol. 2024 Aug 23;34(3):12309. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.12309.

DOI:10.4081/ejtm.2024.12309
PMID:39221581
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11487649/
Abstract

There has been an increasing interest among CrossFit® coaches and practitioners in identifying indicators of sport performance. This study aimed to examine the correlation between anthropometric measures, cardiorespiratory capacity, power, local muscle endurance, and total athleticism score, with performance in the CrossFit® Open 2021. Fourteen male volunteers (aged 30.3 ± 5.8 years) participated in the study and underwent a series of tests on separate weeks. These tests included assessments of body fat percentage (subcutaneous adipose thickness measured at seven sites), maximal oxygen consumption (2 km test in rowing ergometer), muscle power (one repetition maximum in power clean), and muscle endurance (Tibana test, which included the conclusion of four distinct rounds of work). These results were used to calculate the total score of athleticism, which was then compared to the participants performance during the CrossFit® Open 2021. The athletes presented an average of body fat (8.6 ± 2.0%), maximal oxygen consumption (53.3 ± 2.4 mL. (kg.min)-1), 2km row time (07:00 ± 00:21 mm:ss), 1-Repetition maximum in power clean (125.2 ± 21.2 kg) and Tibana test performance (281.0 ± 35.9 repetitions). Interestingly, the top five athletes with the highest scores also achieved the highest z-scores in the CrossFit® Open 2021. Conversely, the four athletes with the lowest TSA score had the lowest z-scores in the CrossFit® Open. Moreover, almost perfect correlation (r = 0.91; p<0.01) was found between the total athleticism score and z-scores in the CrossFit® Open 2021. The total score may be a single measure and holistic indication of athleticism level in CrossFit®. Furthermore, coaches can potentially apply this useful tool for monitoring athletic performance and designing training sessions that address specific areas of CrossFit® performance.

摘要

CrossFit®教练和从业者对确定运动表现指标的兴趣与日俱增。本研究旨在探讨人体测量指标、心肺功能、力量、局部肌肉耐力和总运动能力得分与2021年CrossFit®公开赛成绩之间的相关性。十四名男性志愿者(年龄30.3±5.8岁)参与了该研究,并在不同的周接受了一系列测试。这些测试包括体脂百分比评估(在七个部位测量皮下脂肪厚度)、最大摄氧量(在划船测力计上进行2公里测试)、肌肉力量(力量翻的一次重复最大值)和肌肉耐力(蒂巴纳测试,包括完成四轮不同的工作)。这些结果用于计算运动能力总分,然后将其与参与者在2021年CrossFit®公开赛期间的表现进行比较。运动员的平均体脂率为(8.6±2.0%),最大摄氧量为(53.3±2.4 mL·(kg·min)-1),2公里划船时间为(07:00±00:21分:秒),力量翻的一次重复最大值为(125.2±21.2 kg),蒂巴纳测试成绩为(281.0±35.9次重复)。有趣的是,得分最高的前五名运动员在2021年CrossFit®公开赛中也获得了最高的z分数。相反,总运动能力得分最低的四名运动员在CrossFit®公开赛中的z分数最低。此外,在2021年CrossFit®公开赛中,总运动能力得分与z分数之间发现了几乎完美的相关性(r = 0.91;p<0.01)。总分可能是CrossFit®运动能力水平的单一衡量指标和整体指示。此外,教练可以潜在地应用这个有用的工具来监测运动表现,并设计针对CrossFit®表现特定领域的训练课程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b6b/11487649/027c58a33728/ejtm-34-3-12309-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b6b/11487649/87583b31edf8/ejtm-34-3-12309-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b6b/11487649/efea78a7fc94/ejtm-34-3-12309-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b6b/11487649/400217453cc0/ejtm-34-3-12309-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b6b/11487649/027c58a33728/ejtm-34-3-12309-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b6b/11487649/87583b31edf8/ejtm-34-3-12309-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b6b/11487649/efea78a7fc94/ejtm-34-3-12309-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b6b/11487649/400217453cc0/ejtm-34-3-12309-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b6b/11487649/027c58a33728/ejtm-34-3-12309-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the relationship between Total Athleticism score and CrossFit® Open Performance in amateur athletes: single measure involving body fat percentage, aerobic capacity, muscle power and local muscle endurance.探索业余运动员的综合运动能力得分与CrossFit®公开赛表现之间的关系:一项涉及体脂百分比、有氧能力、肌肉力量和局部肌肉耐力的单一测量。
Eur J Transl Myol. 2024 Aug 23;34(3):12309. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.12309.
2
Local Muscle Endurance and Strength Had Strong Relationship with CrossFit Open 2020 in Amateur Athletes.局部肌肉耐力和力量与2020年业余运动员CrossFit公开赛有密切关系。
Sports (Basel). 2021 Jul 6;9(7):98. doi: 10.3390/sports9070098.
3
Physiological Profiles of Male and Female CrossFit Athletes.男性和女性 CrossFit 运动员的生理特征。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2024 Jun 7;19(8):780-791. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2023-0386. Print 2024 Aug 1.
4
Do physiological measures predict selected CrossFit(®) benchmark performance?生理指标能否预测特定的CrossFit(®)基准测试表现?
Open Access J Sports Med. 2015 Jul 31;6:241-7. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S88265. eCollection 2015.
5
Physiological Predictors of Competition Performance in CrossFit Athletes.CrossFit 运动员比赛表现的生理预测因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 24;17(10):3699. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103699.
6
Physical and Physiological Predictors of FRAN CrossFit WOD Athlete's Performance.FRAN 交叉健身运动员表现的身体和生理预测指标。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 12;18(8):4070. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084070.
7
Evaluation of Body Composition in CrossFit Athletes and the Relation with Their Results in Official Training.评估 CrossFit 运动员的身体成分及其与官方训练成绩的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 2;19(17):11003. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711003.
8
Predicting the Unknown and the Unknowable. Are Anthropometric Measures and Fitness Profile Associated with the Outcome of a Simulated CrossFit Competition?预测未知和不可知的事情。人体测量指标和健康状况与模拟 CrossFit 比赛的结果有关吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;18(7):3692. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073692.
9
Acute Caffeine Supplementation Does Not Improve Performance in Trained CrossFit Athletes.急性补充咖啡因并不能提高训练有素的CrossFit运动员的运动表现。
Sports (Basel). 2020 Apr 23;8(4):54. doi: 10.3390/sports8040054.
10
Somatotype and bioelectrical impedance vector analysis of Italian CrossFit® practitioners.意大利CrossFit®从业者的体型与生物电阻抗矢量分析
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 15;10(8):e29139. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29139. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute physiological responses and performance determinants in Hyrox - a new running-focused high intensity functional fitness trend.Hyrox中的急性生理反应与表现决定因素——一种以跑步为重点的新型高强度功能性健身潮流。
Front Physiol. 2025 Mar 31;16:1519240. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1519240. eCollection 2025.
2
The Effects of CrossFit Practice on Physical Fitness and Overall Quality of Life.CrossFit训练对身体素质和整体生活质量的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 28;22(1):19. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010019.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of the Fran CrossFit Workout on Oxygen Uptake Kinetics, Energetics, and Postexercise Muscle Function in Trained CrossFitters.Fran CrossFit训练对训练有素的CrossFit运动员摄氧动力学、能量代谢及运动后肌肉功能的影响。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2024 Jan 9;19(3):299-306. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2023-0201. Print 2024 Mar 1.
2
Differential improvements between men and women in repeated CrossFit open workouts.男性和女性在重复 CrossFit 公开赛训练中表现出的差异改善。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0283910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283910. eCollection 2023.
3
Pacing Strategies Differ by Sex and Rank in 2020 CrossFit Open Tests.
2020年CrossFit公开赛测试中的配速策略因性别和级别而异。
Sports (Basel). 2023 Oct 11;11(10):199. doi: 10.3390/sports11100199.
4
Total Score of Athleticism: Profiling Strength and Power Characteristics in Professional Soccer Players After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction to Assess Readiness to Return to Sport.运动能力总分:评估前交叉韧带重建后职业足球运动员的力量和爆发力特征,以确定重返运动的准备情况。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Oct;51(12):3121-3130. doi: 10.1177/03635465231194778. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
5
CrossFit: 'Unknowable' or Predictable?-A Systematic Review on Predictors of CrossFit Performance.CrossFit:“不可知”还是可预测?——关于CrossFit运动表现预测因素的系统评价
Sports (Basel). 2023 May 30;11(6):112. doi: 10.3390/sports11060112.
6
Normative Scores for CrossFit Open Workouts: 2011-2022.CrossFit公开赛训练的标准分数:2011 - 2022年
Sports (Basel). 2023 Jan 18;11(2):24. doi: 10.3390/sports11020024.
7
"Functional Fitness Training", CrossFit, HIMT, or HIFT: What Is the Preferable Terminology?“功能性体能训练”、CrossFit、高强度间歇性代谢训练(HIMT)还是高强度功能性训练(HIFT):哪种术语更合适?
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 May 26;4:882195. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.882195. eCollection 2022.
8
Time-course effects of functional fitness sessions performed at different intensities on the metabolic, hormonal, and BDNF responses in trained men.不同强度的功能性健身训练对训练有素男性的代谢、激素和脑源性神经营养因子反应的时间进程效应。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022 Feb 8;14(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00412-6.
9
Local Muscle Endurance and Strength Had Strong Relationship with CrossFit Open 2020 in Amateur Athletes.局部肌肉耐力和力量与2020年业余运动员CrossFit公开赛有密切关系。
Sports (Basel). 2021 Jul 6;9(7):98. doi: 10.3390/sports9070098.
10
Workout Pacing Predictors of Crossfit Open Performance: A Pilot Study.Crossfit公开赛事表现的训练节奏预测因素:一项初步研究。
J Hum Kinet. 2021 Mar 31;78:89-100. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2021-0043. eCollection 2021 Mar.