• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部肌肉耐力和力量与2020年业余运动员CrossFit公开赛有密切关系。

Local Muscle Endurance and Strength Had Strong Relationship with CrossFit Open 2020 in Amateur Athletes.

作者信息

Tibana Ramires Alsamir, de Sousa Neto Ivo Vieira, Sousa Nuno Manuel Frade de, Romeiro Caroline, Hanai Adriana, Brandão Hiury, Dominski Fábio Hech, Voltarelli Fabricio Azevedo

机构信息

Graduate Program in Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFTM), Cuiabá 78060-900, Brazil.

Laboratory of Molecular Analysis, Graduate Program of Sciences and Technology of Health, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 72220-900, Brazil.

出版信息

Sports (Basel). 2021 Jul 6;9(7):98. doi: 10.3390/sports9070098.

DOI:10.3390/sports9070098
PMID:34357932
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8309786/
Abstract

This study analyzed the relationship between anthropometric measures, cardiorespiratory capacity, strength, power, and local muscle endurance with performance in the CrossFit Open 2020. For this, 17 volunteers (6 women) (29.0 ± 7.2 years) completed, on separate weeks, tests for body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), maximal oxygen consumption (2 km row test), muscle strength (one repetition maximum (1 RM) back and front squat, isometric peak torque), muscle power (1 RM snatch and clean and jerk) and muscle endurance (Tibana test), which were compared with performance during the CrossFit Open 2020. Specific tests of localized muscular endurance and muscle strength had the strongest relationship with performance in the CrossFit Open 2020. On the other hand, the percentage of fat and cardiorespiratory capacity were not significantly correlated with CrossFit Open 2020 workout performance. Coaches and practitioners should therefore utilize these findings to assess physical fitness and organize the distribution of the training session based on less developed physical needs, in order to ensure an appropriate physiological adaptation for a given competition.

摘要

本研究分析了人体测量指标、心肺功能、力量、功率和局部肌肉耐力与2020年CrossFit公开赛成绩之间的关系。为此,17名志愿者(6名女性)(29.0±7.2岁)在不同的周内分别完成了身体成分测试(双能X线吸收法)、最大摄氧量测试(2公里划船测试)、肌肉力量测试(深蹲和前蹲的一次重复最大值(1RM)、等长峰值扭矩)、肌肉功率测试(抓举和挺举的1RM)以及肌肉耐力测试(蒂巴纳测试),并将这些测试结果与2020年CrossFit公开赛期间的成绩进行了比较。局部肌肉耐力和肌肉力量的特定测试与2020年CrossFit公开赛的成绩关系最为密切。另一方面,体脂百分比和心肺功能与2020年CrossFit公开赛的训练表现没有显著相关性。因此,教练和从业者应利用这些研究结果来评估身体素质,并根据较薄弱的身体需求来安排训练课程的分配,以确保针对特定比赛进行适当的生理适应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa46/8309786/318bb2247d0d/sports-09-00098-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa46/8309786/9df62f8daada/sports-09-00098-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa46/8309786/318bb2247d0d/sports-09-00098-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa46/8309786/9df62f8daada/sports-09-00098-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa46/8309786/318bb2247d0d/sports-09-00098-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Local Muscle Endurance and Strength Had Strong Relationship with CrossFit Open 2020 in Amateur Athletes.局部肌肉耐力和力量与2020年业余运动员CrossFit公开赛有密切关系。
Sports (Basel). 2021 Jul 6;9(7):98. doi: 10.3390/sports9070098.
2
Exploring the relationship between Total Athleticism score and CrossFit® Open Performance in amateur athletes: single measure involving body fat percentage, aerobic capacity, muscle power and local muscle endurance.探索业余运动员的综合运动能力得分与CrossFit®公开赛表现之间的关系:一项涉及体脂百分比、有氧能力、肌肉力量和局部肌肉耐力的单一测量。
Eur J Transl Myol. 2024 Aug 23;34(3):12309. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.12309.
3
Predicting the Unknown and the Unknowable. Are Anthropometric Measures and Fitness Profile Associated with the Outcome of a Simulated CrossFit Competition?预测未知和不可知的事情。人体测量指标和健康状况与模拟 CrossFit 比赛的结果有关吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;18(7):3692. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073692.
4
Physiological Profiles of Male and Female CrossFit Athletes.男性和女性 CrossFit 运动员的生理特征。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2024 Jun 7;19(8):780-791. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2023-0386. Print 2024 Aug 1.
5
Do physiological measures predict selected CrossFit(®) benchmark performance?生理指标能否预测特定的CrossFit(®)基准测试表现?
Open Access J Sports Med. 2015 Jul 31;6:241-7. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S88265. eCollection 2015.
6
Physical and Physiological Predictors of FRAN CrossFit WOD Athlete's Performance.FRAN 交叉健身运动员表现的身体和生理预测指标。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 12;18(8):4070. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084070.
7
Determination of a CrossFit Benchmark Performance Profile.确定一项CrossFit基准表现概况。
Sports (Basel). 2021 Jun 2;9(6):80. doi: 10.3390/sports9060080.
8
Physiological Predictors of Competition Performance in CrossFit Athletes.CrossFit 运动员比赛表现的生理预测因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 24;17(10):3699. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103699.
9
Physiological Performance Measures as Indicators of CrossFit Performance.作为CrossFit运动表现指标的生理性能测量
Sports (Basel). 2019 Apr 22;7(4):93. doi: 10.3390/sports7040093.
10
Peer Verbal Encouragement Is More Effective than Coach Encouragement in Enhancing CrossFit-Specific 1-RM Strength, Functional Endurance, and Psychophysiological Assessment Performance.在提高特定CrossFit的1-RM力量、功能耐力和心理生理评估表现方面,同伴言语鼓励比教练鼓励更有效。
Sports (Basel). 2024 Feb 20;12(3):64. doi: 10.3390/sports12030064.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of cold-water immersion vs. massage in reducing delayed-onset muscle soreness and enhancing recovery following CrossFit® Murph Workout: Randomized rial.冷水浸泡与按摩对减轻CrossFit® Murph训练后延迟性肌肉酸痛及促进恢复的效果:随机试验
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 13;20(8):e0329892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329892. eCollection 2025.
2
Acute effect of three functional fitness training designs with equalized load on inexperienced and experienced athletes.三种负荷均衡的功能性体能训练设计对新手和有经验运动员的急性影响。
PeerJ. 2025 Apr 30;13:e19265. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19265. eCollection 2025.
3
The physical demands and physiological responses to CrossFit®: a scoping review with evidence gap map and meta-correlation.

本文引用的文献

1
A Maximal Rowing Ergometer Protocol to Predict Maximal Oxygen Uptake.最大划船测功仪方案预测最大摄氧量。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021 Mar 1;16(3):382-386. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0932. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
2
Session Rating of Perceived Exertion Is a Superior Method to Monitor Internal Training Loads of Functional Fitness Training Sessions Performed at Different Intensities When Compared to Training Impulse.与训练冲量相比,主观用力程度评分是监测不同强度功能性体能训练课内部训练负荷的更优方法。
Front Physiol. 2020 Aug 12;11:919. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00919. eCollection 2020.
3
Predictors of CrossFit Open Performance.
对CrossFit®的身体需求和生理反应:一项基于证据差距图和元相关性的范围综述
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Sep 20;16(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00986-3.
4
Exploring the relationship between Total Athleticism score and CrossFit® Open Performance in amateur athletes: single measure involving body fat percentage, aerobic capacity, muscle power and local muscle endurance.探索业余运动员的综合运动能力得分与CrossFit®公开赛表现之间的关系:一项涉及体脂百分比、有氧能力、肌肉力量和局部肌肉耐力的单一测量。
Eur J Transl Myol. 2024 Aug 23;34(3):12309. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.12309.
5
The influence of sex-division, experience, and pacing strategy on performance in the 2020 CrossFit® Open.性别划分、经验和节奏策略对2020年CrossFit®公开赛成绩的影响。
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Jan 19;6:1344036. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1344036. eCollection 2024.
6
Wrist Extensor Muscle Fatigue During a Dual Task With Two Muscular and Cognitive Load Levels in Younger and Older Adults.年轻人和老年人在两种肌肉和认知负荷水平的双重任务下腕伸肌疲劳。
Hum Factors. 2024 Nov;66(11):2433-2450. doi: 10.1177/00187208231218196. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
7
CrossFit: 'Unknowable' or Predictable?-A Systematic Review on Predictors of CrossFit Performance.CrossFit:“不可知”还是可预测?——关于CrossFit运动表现预测因素的系统评价
Sports (Basel). 2023 May 30;11(6):112. doi: 10.3390/sports11060112.
8
Association of Strength Performance in Bench Press and Squat with Anthropometric Variables between Resistance-Trained Males and Females.抗阻训练的男性和女性卧推与深蹲力量表现与人体测量变量的关联
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023 Feb 1;8(1):19. doi: 10.3390/jfmk8010019.
9
Performance Sex Differences in CrossFit.CrossFit中的性别表现差异。
Sports (Basel). 2022 Oct 25;10(11):165. doi: 10.3390/sports10110165.
10
Time Course of Recovery Following CrossFit Karen Benchmark Workout in Trained Men.训练有素的男性进行CrossFit Karen基准训练后的恢复时间进程
Front Physiol. 2022 Aug 19;13:899652. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.899652. eCollection 2022.
CrossFit公开赛表现的预测因素。
Sports (Basel). 2020 Jul 20;8(7):102. doi: 10.3390/sports8070102.
4
Full-Squat as a Determinant of Performance in CrossFit.全蹲作为 CrossFit 表现的决定因素。
Int J Sports Med. 2019 Sep;40(9):592-596. doi: 10.1055/a-0960-9717. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
5
Is Perceived Exertion a Useful Indicator of the Metabolic and Cardiovascular Responses to a Metabolic Conditioning Session of Functional Fitness?自觉用力程度是否是功能性健身代谢训练课中代谢和心血管反应的有用指标?
Sports (Basel). 2019 Jul 4;7(7):161. doi: 10.3390/sports7070161.
6
Are extreme conditioning programmes effective and safe? A narrative review of high-intensity functional training methods research paradigms and findings.极限训练计划是否有效且安全?高强度功能性训练方法的研究范式与结果的叙述性综述。
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018 Nov 2;4(1):e000435. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000435. eCollection 2018.
7
Correlation of Percentage Body Fat and Muscle Mass with Anaerobic an Aerobic Performance in Collegiate Soccer Players.大学生足球运动员体脂百分比和肌肉质量与无氧及有氧运动表现的相关性
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;60(2):137-144.
8
Validity of maximal isometric knee extension strength measurements obtained via belt-stabilized hand-held dynamometry in healthy adults.通过带稳定手持式测力计获得的健康成年人最大等长膝关节伸展力量测量的有效性。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Nov;29(11):1987-1992. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1987. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
9
Body fat percentage is more associated with low physical fitness than with sedentarism and diet in male and female adolescents.在青少年男性和女性中,体脂百分比与低身体素质的关联比与久坐不动和饮食的关联更大。
Physiol Behav. 2016 Oct 15;165:166-72. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
10
National Strength and Conditioning Association Position Statement on Long-Term Athletic Development.美国国家体能协会关于长期运动发展的立场声明。
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Jun;30(6):1491-509. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001387.