Suppr超能文献

比较纳入骨髓样本 NGS 分析前后 AML 的疾病和风险分类。

Comparison of disease and risk classifications of AML before and after incorporation of NGS analysis of bone marrow samples.

机构信息

Division of Internal Medicine, Fukuyama City Hospital, Fukuyama, Japan.

Department of Hematology, Chugoku Central Hospital of Japan Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Fukuyama, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Hematol. 2024 Nov;120(5):594-600. doi: 10.1007/s12185-024-03841-w. Epub 2024 Sep 2.

Abstract

Mutation profiling by next-generation sequencing (NGS) has facilitated understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and has been incorporated into the new disease classification (International Consensus Classification; ICC) and risk classification (European LeukemiaNet [ELN] 2022; ELN2022). We compared disease subtypes between the previous disease classification (4th edition of the WHO classification; WHO-4) and the ICC in 91 patients with AML diagnosed at our institution. We also compared disease risk classifications using the previous risk classification (ELN2017) and the ELN2022. Targeted sequencing of bone marrow samples was conducted at Kyoto University. We found that entities under AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities were well-established, with almost no change from the WHO-4 to the ICC. In contrast, 16.7% of cases of AML, not otherwise specified in the WHO-4 were reclassified into AML with mutated TP53, and 36.7% were reclassified into AML with myelodysplasia-related gene mutations or cytogenetic abnormalities per the ICC. Meanwhile, the ELN2017 and ELN2022 showed no difference in concordance indexes in multivariate Cox regression analysis for progression-free and overall survival. The superiority of the ELN2022 over the ELN2017 could not be confirmed in our single-center retrospective study, and further investigation including multicenter prospective studies is needed.

摘要

下一代测序(NGS)的突变分析促进了对急性髓系白血病(AML)分子发病机制的理解,并已纳入新的疾病分类(国际共识分类;ICC)和风险分类(欧洲白血病网[ELN]2022;ELN2022)。我们比较了在我们机构诊断的 91 例 AML 患者中,之前的疾病分类(WHO 分类第 4 版;WHO-4)和 ICC 之间的疾病亚型。我们还比较了使用之前的风险分类(ELN2017)和 ELN2022 的疾病风险分类。京都大学对骨髓样本进行了靶向测序。我们发现,具有反复遗传异常的 AML 实体已经确立,与 WHO-4 相比几乎没有变化。相比之下,在 WHO-4 中未特指的 AML 中,有 16.7%被重新分类为 TP53 突变的 AML,有 36.7%根据 ICC 被重新分类为伴髓系发育相关基因突变或细胞遗传学异常的 AML。同时,ELN2017 和 ELN2022 在多变量 Cox 回归分析中用于无进展生存和总生存的一致性指数没有差异。在我们的单中心回顾性研究中,无法证实 ELN2022 优于 ELN2017,需要进一步包括多中心前瞻性研究的调查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验