• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证和改进 2022 年欧洲白血病网络急性髓系白血病的遗传风险分层。

Validation and refinement of the 2022 European LeukemiaNet genetic risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia.

机构信息

Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Leukemia. 2023 Jun;37(6):1234-1244. doi: 10.1038/s41375-023-01884-2. Epub 2023 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1038/s41375-023-01884-2
PMID:37041198
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10244159/
Abstract

The revised 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) AML risk stratification system requires validation in large, homogeneously treated cohorts. We studied 1118 newly diagnosed AML patients (median age, 58 years; range, 18-86 years) who received cytarabine-based induction chemotherapy between 1999 and 2012 and compared ELN-2022 to the previous ELN-2017 risk classification. Key findings were validated in a cohort of 1160 mostly younger patients. ELN-2022 reclassified 15% of patients, 3% into more favorable, and 12% into more adverse risk groups. This was mainly driven by patients reclassified from intermediate- to adverse-risk based on additional myelodysplasia-related mutations being included as adverse-risk markers. These patients (n = 79) had significantly better outcomes than patients with other adverse-risk genotypes (5-year OS, 26% vs. 12%) and resembled the remaining intermediate-risk group. Overall, time-dependent ROC curves and Harrel's C-index controlling for age, sex, and AML type (de novo vs. sAML/tAML) show slightly worse prognostic discrimination of ELN-2022 compared to ELN-2017 for OS. Further refinement of ELN-2022 without including additional genetic markers is possible, in particular by recognizing TP53-mutated patients with complex karyotypes as "very adverse". In summary, the ELN-2022 risk classification identifies a larger group of adverse-risk patients at the cost of slightly reduced prognostic accuracy compared to ELN-2017.

摘要

修订后的 2022 年欧洲白血病网络(ELN)急性髓系白血病(AML)风险分层系统需要在大规模、同质治疗队列中进行验证。我们研究了 1118 例新诊断的 AML 患者(中位年龄 58 岁;范围 18-86 岁),他们在 1999 年至 2012 年期间接受了基于阿糖胞苷的诱导化疗,并将 ELN-2022 与之前的 ELN-2017 风险分类进行了比较。关键发现已在一组 1160 例主要为年轻患者的队列中得到验证。ELN-2022 重新分类了 15%的患者,其中 3%进入更有利的风险组,12%进入更不利的风险组。这主要是由于根据纳入的骨髓增生异常相关突变将中间风险患者重新分类为不利风险组。这些患者(n=79)的结局明显优于其他不利风险基因型的患者(5 年 OS,26% vs. 12%),与其余中间风险组相似。总体而言,时间依赖性 ROC 曲线和控制年龄、性别和 AML 类型(初发 vs. sAML/tAML)的 Harrell's C 指数显示,ELN-2022 对 OS 的预后判别能力略逊于 ELN-2017。进一步细化 ELN-2022 而不包括其他遗传标志物是可能的,特别是将具有复杂核型的 TP53 突变患者识别为“非常不利”。总之,ELN-2022 风险分类确定了更大比例的不利风险患者,但其预后准确性略低于 ELN-2017。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9fe/10244159/8de195b84a99/41375_2023_1884_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9fe/10244159/e8c7e04bb54e/41375_2023_1884_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9fe/10244159/4b5fe94a77f0/41375_2023_1884_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9fe/10244159/8ba650e9efb3/41375_2023_1884_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9fe/10244159/f19f1ad5c617/41375_2023_1884_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9fe/10244159/d49d97a9745c/41375_2023_1884_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9fe/10244159/8de195b84a99/41375_2023_1884_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9fe/10244159/e8c7e04bb54e/41375_2023_1884_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9fe/10244159/4b5fe94a77f0/41375_2023_1884_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9fe/10244159/8ba650e9efb3/41375_2023_1884_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9fe/10244159/f19f1ad5c617/41375_2023_1884_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9fe/10244159/d49d97a9745c/41375_2023_1884_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9fe/10244159/8de195b84a99/41375_2023_1884_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation and refinement of the 2022 European LeukemiaNet genetic risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia.验证和改进 2022 年欧洲白血病网络急性髓系白血病的遗传风险分层。
Leukemia. 2023 Jun;37(6):1234-1244. doi: 10.1038/s41375-023-01884-2. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
2
Validation of the prognostic significance of the 2022 European LeukemiaNet risk stratification system in intensive chemotherapy treated aged 18 to 65 years patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia.2022年欧洲白血病网风险分层系统对接受强化化疗的18至65岁初诊急性髓系白血病患者预后意义的验证
Am J Hematol. 2023 May;98(5):760-769. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26892. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
3
Validation and refinement of the revised 2017 European LeukemiaNet genetic risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia.验证和完善 2017 年修订的欧洲白血病网络急性髓系白血病遗传风险分层。
Leukemia. 2020 Dec;34(12):3161-3172. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0806-0. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
4
Validation of the 2017 European LeukemiaNet classification for acute myeloid leukemia with NPM1 and FLT3-internal tandem duplication genotypes.验证 2017 年欧洲白血病网络分类与 NPM1 和 FLT3 内部串联重复基因型的急性髓系白血病。
Cancer. 2019 Apr 1;125(7):1091-1100. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31885. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
5
Prognostic analysis according to European LeukemiaNet 2022 risk stratification for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with decitabine.根据 2022 年欧洲白血病网络对接受地西他滨治疗的老年急性髓系白血病患者的危险分层进行预后分析。
Hematology. 2024 Dec;29(1):2324417. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2024.2324417. Epub 2024 Mar 3.
6
Beat-AML 2024 ELN-refined risk stratification for older adults with newly diagnosed AML given lower-intensity therapy.基于低强度治疗的新诊断 AML 老年患者的 Beat-AML 2024 ELN 精细化风险分层。
Blood Adv. 2024 Oct 22;8(20):5297-5305. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013685.
7
Validation of the 2022 European LeukemiaNet risk stratification for acute myeloid leukemia.验证 2022 年欧洲白血病网络急性髓细胞白血病风险分层。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 12;14(1):8517. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57295-5.
8
Assessment of 2022 European LeukemiaNet risk classification system in real-world cohort from China.评估 2022 年欧洲白血病网络风险分类系统在中国真实世界队列中的表现。
Cancer Med. 2023 Dec;12(24):21615-21626. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6696. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
9
European LeukemiaNet 2017 risk stratification for acute myeloid leukemia: validation in a risk-adapted protocol.欧洲白血病网络 2017 年急性髓细胞白血病风险分层:适应风险方案的验证。
Blood Adv. 2022 Feb 22;6(4):1193-1206. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005585.
10
Comparison and validation of the 2022 European LeukemiaNet guidelines in acute myeloid leukemia.比较和验证 2022 年欧洲白血病网络指南在急性髓细胞白血病中的应用。
Blood Adv. 2023 May 9;7(9):1899-1909. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009010.

引用本文的文献

1
Apoptosis-targeting BH3 mimetics: transforming treatment for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia.靶向凋亡的BH3模拟物:改变急性髓系白血病患者的治疗方式
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1038/s41571-025-01068-0.
2
The interaction between common genetic mutations in AML and the immune landscape: mechanisms and implications for immune response.急性髓系白血病常见基因突变与免疫格局之间的相互作用:免疫反应的机制及意义
Front Immunol. 2025 Aug 11;16:1635111. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1635111. eCollection 2025.
3
Targeting the roots of myeloid malignancies with T cell receptors.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes in Patients with Poor-Risk Cytogenetics with or without TP53 Mutations Treated with Venetoclax and Azacitidine.伴有或不伴有 TP53 突变的不良细胞遗传学患者接受 Venetoclax 和阿扎胞苷治疗的结局。
Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Dec 15;28(24):5272-5279. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1183.
2
Unified classification and risk-stratification in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.急性髓系白血病的统一分类和危险分层。
Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 8;13(1):4622. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32103-8.
3
Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN.
利用T细胞受体靶向髓系恶性肿瘤的根源。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1038/s41568-025-00857-0.
4
Multi-Modal and Data-Driven Assessment of Myeloid Neoplasms Refines Classification Across Disease States.髓系肿瘤的多模态和数据驱动评估优化了疾病状态的分类。
Blood Cancer Discov. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-25-0047.
5
Impact of Time to Treatment Initiation on Quality of Response in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Intensive Chemotherapy.急性髓系白血病患者接受强化化疗时治疗开始时间对缓解质量的影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 18;17(12):2028. doi: 10.3390/cancers17122028.
6
Advances in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Implications for Low- and Middle-Income Countries.急性髓系白血病治疗进展:对低收入和中等收入国家的影响
Biomedicines. 2025 May 18;13(5):1221. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13051221.
7
Venetoclax and hypomethylating agents versus induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.维奈托克与去甲基化药物对比诱导化疗用于新诊断急性髓系白血病患者:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Cancer. 2025 May 19;25(1):894. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14311-9.
8
Proposed Refinement of 2022 European LeukemiaNet Adverse-Risk Group of AML Patients Using a Real-World Cohort.利用真实世界队列对2022年欧洲白血病网络AML患者不良风险组的拟议优化
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 23;17(9):1405. doi: 10.3390/cancers17091405.
9
Prognostic impact of clonal representation of myelodysplasia-related gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia.骨髓增生异常相关基因突变的克隆性表现对急性髓系白血病的预后影响
Leukemia. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1038/s41375-025-02622-6.
10
Blood-based proteomic profiling identifies OSMR as a novel biomarker of AML outcomes.基于血液的蛋白质组学分析确定OSMR为急性髓系白血病预后的新型生物标志物。
Blood. 2025 Jun 19;145(25):3015-3029. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024027244.
成人 AML 的诊断与治疗:ELN 专家组代表发布的 2022 年国际专家建议
Blood. 2022 Sep 22;140(12):1345-1377. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022016867.
4
International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data.国际髓系肿瘤和急性白血病分类:整合形态学、临床和基因组数据。
Blood. 2022 Sep 15;140(11):1200-1228. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022015850.
5
Efficacy and safety of enasidenib and azacitidine combination in patients with IDH2 mutated acute myeloid leukemia and not eligible for intensive chemotherapy.IDH2 突变型急性髓系白血病且不适宜强化化疗患者中依沙尼布联合阿扎胞苷的疗效和安全性。
Blood Cancer J. 2022 Jan 25;12(1):10. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00604-2.
6
European LeukemiaNet 2017 risk stratification for acute myeloid leukemia: validation in a risk-adapted protocol.欧洲白血病网络 2017 年急性髓细胞白血病风险分层:适应风险方案的验证。
Blood Adv. 2022 Feb 22;6(4):1193-1206. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005585.
7
CEBPA mutations in 4708 patients with acute myeloid leukemia: differential impact of bZIP and TAD mutations on outcome.CEBPA 基因突变在 4708 例急性髓系白血病患者中的作用:bZIP 和 TAD 突变对预后的不同影响。
Blood. 2022 Jan 6;139(1):87-103. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020009680.
8
CEBPA-bZip mutations are associated with favorable prognosis in de novo AML: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.CEBPA-bZip 突变与初发性 AML 的有利预后相关:来自儿童肿瘤学组的报告。
Blood. 2021 Sep 30;138(13):1137-1147. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020009652.
9
Azacitidine and Venetoclax in Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia.阿扎胞苷和维奈托克治疗未经治急性髓系白血病。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 13;383(7):617-629. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2012971.
10
Sorafenib Maintenance After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia With -Internal Tandem Duplication Mutation (SORMAIN).异基因造血干细胞移植治疗伴有内部串联重复突变的急性髓系白血病后的索拉非尼维持治疗(SORMAIN)。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 10;38(26):2993-3002. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.03345. Epub 2020 Jul 16.