Suppr超能文献

POINT 试验中与索引性卒中相关的治疗时间和残疾。

Time to treatment and disability attributed to index stroke in the POINT trial.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Nov;33(11):107988. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107988. Epub 2024 Sep 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) trial, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was associated with reduced disability attributable to the index stroke compared to antiplatelet monotherapy. However, it is unknown whether earlier treatment with DAPT versus aspirin is associated with greater benefit.

METHODS

We analyzed patients enrolled in POINT with minor ischemic stroke who had available data recording the treatment initiation time and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Patients were randomized to DAPT (aspirin plus clopidogrel) vs. aspirin alone within 12 h of symptom onset. We estimated the effect of DAPT on disability (defined as mRS>1) ascribed to the index event and major hemorrhage at 90 days, stratified by tertiles of time from symptom onset-to-treatment-initiation.

RESULTS

A total of 2559 patients were included; median onset-to-treatment-initiation time was 8.3 h (IQR:5.8-11.0). Comparing DAPT to aspirin, the rate of disability attributed to the index event at 90-day follow-up was 5.1 % vs. 8.6 % (OR 0.57; 95 % CI:0.33-0.99) in patients treated <6.7 h, 7.5 % vs. 9.9 % (OR 0.74; 95 % CI:0.45-1.19) in those treated 6.7-10.0 h, and 8.6 % vs. 10.6 % (OR 0.80; 95 % CI:0.50-1.26) in those treated >10.0 h after symptom onset (p for interaction=0.65). There was no difference in major hemorrhage across time strata.

CONCLUSIONS

While not statistically significant, these results suggest the possibility of greater efficacy at reducing disability ascribed to minor stroke with earlier treatment with DAPT compared to aspirin.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Identifier: NCT00991029.

摘要

背景

在血小板导向的短暂性脑缺血发作和小卒中抑制(POINT)试验中,与抗血小板单药治疗相比,双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)可降低与指数性卒中相关的残疾。然而,目前尚不清楚早期使用 DAPT 与阿司匹林相比是否具有更大的获益。

方法

我们分析了POINT 试验中入组的小卒中患者,这些患者有记录治疗起始时间和 90 天改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)的可用数据。患者在症状发作后 12 小时内随机分为 DAPT(阿司匹林加氯吡格雷)组或阿司匹林单药组。我们根据症状发作至治疗起始时间的三分位时间,评估了 DAPT 对指数事件所致残疾(定义为 mRS>1)和 90 天主要出血的影响。

结果

共纳入 2559 例患者;中位症状发作至治疗起始时间为 8.3 h(IQR:5.8-11.0)。与阿司匹林相比,在 90 天随访时,DAPT 组索引事件所致残疾的发生率为 5.1%,阿司匹林组为 8.6%(OR 0.57;95%CI:0.33-0.99);在症状发作后<6.7 h 治疗的患者中,DAPT 组为 7.5%,阿司匹林组为 9.9%(OR 0.74;95%CI:0.45-1.19);在症状发作后 6.7-10.0 h 治疗的患者中,DAPT 组为 8.6%,阿司匹林组为 10.6%(OR 0.80;95%CI:0.50-1.26)(p 交互=0.65)。各时间分层之间主要出血无差异。

结论

尽管无统计学意义,但这些结果提示,与阿司匹林相比,DAPT 早期治疗可能更能降低小卒中所致残疾。

注册

网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;标识符:NCT00991029。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验