Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation, Via Operai 40, 16149, Genoa, Italy.
Department of Physiopathology, Experimental Medicine and Public Health, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 2;14(1):20362. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71374-7.
As meaningful measure of cognitive impairment (CI), cognitive phenotypes provide an avenue for symptom management and individualized rehabilitation. Since CI is highly variable in severity and progression, monitoring cognitive phenotypes over time may be useful to identify trajectory of cognitive decline in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Based on cognitive and mood information from patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinician-assessed outcomes (CAOs), four cognitive subgroups of people with MS (PwMS) were identified: phenotype 1 (44.5%) showed a preserved cognitive profile; phenotype 2 (22.8%) had a mild-cognitive impairment profile with attention difficulties; phenotype 3 (24.3%) included people with marked difficulties in visuo-executive, attention, language, memory and information processing speed; lastly, phenotype 4 (8.4%) grouped individuals with a multi-domain impairment profile (visuo-executive, attention, language, memory, orientation, information processing speed and mood disorders). Although some fluctuations occurred considering the rate of impairment, cognitive phenotypes did not substantially vary at follow up in terms of type and number of impairments, suggesting that 1 year is a relatively brief temporal window to observe considerable changes. Our results corroborate that investigating cognitive phenotypes and their stability over time would provide valuable information regarding CI and, in addition, increase clinical importance of PROs and CAOs and their uptake in decision-making and individualized treatment planning for PwMS.
作为认知障碍(CI)的有意义衡量标准,认知表型为症状管理和个性化康复提供了途径。由于 CI 的严重程度和进展高度可变,因此随着时间的推移监测认知表型可能有助于识别多发性硬化症(MS)认知下降的轨迹。基于来自患者报告结果(PRO)和临床医生评估结果(CAO)的认知和情绪信息,确定了四种 MS 患者(PwMS)的认知亚组:表型 1(44.5%)表现出认知特征完好无损;表型 2(22.8%)具有轻度认知障碍特征,伴有注意力困难;表型 3(24.3%)包括在视空间执行、注意力、语言、记忆和信息处理速度方面存在明显困难的人群;最后,表型 4(8.4%)将具有多领域损伤特征(视空间执行、注意力、语言、记忆、定向、信息处理速度和情绪障碍)的个体分组。尽管考虑到损伤率会出现一些波动,但认知表型在随访时在类型和损伤数量方面并没有实质性变化,这表明 1 年是观察相当大变化的相对较短的时间窗口。我们的研究结果证实,研究认知表型及其随时间的稳定性将为 CI 提供有价值的信息,此外,还将增加 PRO 和 CAO 的临床重要性及其在决策和个性化治疗计划中的应用,以治疗 PwMS。