• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单部位与多部位清创、灌洗及保留假体(DAIR)治疗髋膝关节假体周围感染的成功率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Success rate of single versus multiple debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Orthopedic Surgery Department, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Specialty Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Dec;34(8):3859-3872. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04091-6. Epub 2024 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00590-024-04091-6
PMID:39223364
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11519117/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This systematic review aimed to compare outcomes between multiple and single debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) procedures for early periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in hip and knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Four databases were searched from inception till January 2024 for original studies investigating the outcomes of multiple DAIR in hip and knee PJI. The primary outcome was the success rate in eradicating joint infection. This review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 9 observational studies with 1104 participants were included, with a mean age and BMI of 58.37 years (95%CI: 25.77-90.98) and 31.43 kg/m (95%CI: 28.89-34.98), respectively. The mean follow-up period was 58.37 months (95%CI: 25.77-90.98), and the average MINORS score assigned to the review was 17.6 ± 3.46, indicating a low overall risk of bias. An equivalent success rate between single and double DAIR was observed, at 67% (95%CI: 64-71%) and 70% (95%CI: 48-86%), respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the two treatment modalities (p = 0.740). Additionally, the success rate for triple DAIR ranged from 50 to 60%.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that double DAIR is a valid treatment option for acute PJI after TKA and THA, with a success rate comparable to single DAIR (70% vs. 67%, p = 0.740). Triple DAIR achieved success rates ranging from 50 to 60%. However, caution is warranted when interpreting these results due to heterogeneity in host comorbidity factors, DAIR protocols, and antibiotic regimens.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level III.

摘要

目的

本系统评价旨在比较髋关节和膝关节置换术后早期人工关节周围感染(PJI)的多次清创术、抗生素和保留植入物(DAIR)与单次清创术、抗生素和保留植入物(DAIR)的疗效。

方法

从数据库建立到 2024 年 1 月,检索了 4 个数据库,以调查髋关节和膝关节 PJI 中多次 DAIR 的疗效。主要结局是消除关节感染的成功率。本研究按照 PRISMA 指南进行。

结果

共纳入 9 项观察性研究,1104 例患者,平均年龄和 BMI 分别为 58.37 岁(95%CI:25.77-90.98)和 31.43kg/m(95%CI:28.89-34.98),平均随访时间为 58.37 个月(95%CI:25.77-90.98),纳入文献的 MINORS 评分平均为 17.6±3.46,总体偏倚风险较低。单次和双次 DAIR 的成功率相当,分别为 67%(95%CI:64-71%)和 70%(95%CI:48-86%),两种治疗方法之间无统计学差异(p=0.740)。此外,三次 DAIR 的成功率为 50%至 60%。

结论

本研究表明,对于 TKA 和 THA 后急性 PJI,双次 DAIR 是一种有效的治疗选择,成功率与单次 DAIR 相当(70% vs. 67%,p=0.740)。三次 DAIR 的成功率为 50%至 60%。然而,由于宿主合并症因素、DAIR 方案和抗生素方案的异质性,在解释这些结果时需要谨慎。

证据水平

治疗性,III 级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42f3/11519117/42f1a6a427fa/590_2024_4091_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42f3/11519117/9d7cadf3b488/590_2024_4091_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42f3/11519117/0d1c26972588/590_2024_4091_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42f3/11519117/dc7d0a7d9a08/590_2024_4091_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42f3/11519117/13c305030db4/590_2024_4091_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42f3/11519117/42f1a6a427fa/590_2024_4091_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42f3/11519117/9d7cadf3b488/590_2024_4091_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42f3/11519117/0d1c26972588/590_2024_4091_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42f3/11519117/dc7d0a7d9a08/590_2024_4091_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42f3/11519117/13c305030db4/590_2024_4091_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42f3/11519117/42f1a6a427fa/590_2024_4091_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Success rate of single versus multiple debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单部位与多部位清创、灌洗及保留假体(DAIR)治疗髋膝关节假体周围感染的成功率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Dec;34(8):3859-3872. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04091-6. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
2
Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for the early prosthetic joint infection of total knee and hip arthroplasties: a systematic review.清创术、抗生素和植入物保留(DAIR)治疗全膝关节和髋关节置换术后早期假体关节感染:系统评价。
J ISAKOS. 2024 Feb;9(1):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.09.003. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
3
Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention after revision arthroplasty : antibiotic mismatch, timing, and repeated DAIR associated with poor outcome.翻修术后清创、抗生素和植入物保留:抗生素不匹配、时机和重复的 DAIR 与不良结局相关。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Apr;104-B(4):464-471. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B4.BJJ-2021-1264.R1.
4
Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) following hip and knee arthroplasty: results and findings of a multidisciplinary approach from a non-specialist prosthetic infection centre.髋关节和膝关节置换术后清创、抗生素和保留植入物(DAIR):来自非专科假体感染中心的多学科方法的结果和发现。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Sep;106(7):633-641. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0076. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
5
The outcomes of acute periprosthetic joint infection following unicompartmental knee replacement managed with early debridement, Antibiotics, and implant retention.单髁膝关节置换术后早期清创术、抗生素治疗和保留假体治疗急性假体周围关节感染的结果。
Knee. 2024 Mar;47:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2023.12.001. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
6
Functional outcome of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention in periprosthetic joint infection involving the hip: a case-control study.清创、抗生素治疗及保留植入物治疗髋关节假体周围感染的功能结局:一项病例对照研究
Bone Joint J. 2017 May;99-B(5):614-622. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2016-0562.R2.
7
Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection.清创术、抗生素和植入物保留治疗急性假体周围关节感染。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Apr;12(2):463-470. doi: 10.1111/os.12641. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
8
Acceptable Success Rate in Patients With Periprosthetic Knee Joint Infection Treated With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention.保肢清创术联合抗生素治疗治疗人工膝关节置换术后感染的可接受成功率。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Feb;34(2):365-368. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.088. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
9
Debridement and implant retention in the management of hip periprosthetic joint infection: outcomes following guided and rapid treatment at a single centre.髋关节假体周围感染处理中的清创与植入物保留:单中心引导式快速治疗后的结果
Bone Joint J. 2017 Mar;99-B(3):330-336. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B3.BJJ-2016-0609.R1.
10
Prosthetic joint-associated infections treated with DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, irrigation, and retention): analysis of risk factors and local antibiotic carriers in 91 patients.采用 DAIR(清创、抗生素、灌洗和保留)治疗的人工关节相关感染:91 例患者的风险因素和局部抗生素载体分析。
Acta Orthop. 2013 Aug;84(4):380-6. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.823589. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
One-year success after debridement, antibiotic therapy, and implant retention for acute hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection: a retrospective cohort study of 62 patients.清创、抗生素治疗及保留植入物治疗急性髋膝关节假体周围感染后的一年成功率:一项对62例患者的回顾性队列研究
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jul 22;35(1):316. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04438-7.

本文引用的文献

1
One-stage revision versus debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for acute prosthetic knee infection: an exploratory cohort study.一期翻修与清创、抗生素和保留植入物(DAIR)治疗急性人工膝关节感染:一项探索性队列研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Sep;143(9):5787-5792. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04891-1. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
2
Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is successful in the management of acutely infected unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a case series.清创术、抗生素和保留植入物(DAIR)治疗急性感染性单室膝关节置换术是成功的:病例系列。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):680-688. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2179105.
3
The outcomes of total hip replacement in osteonecrosis versus osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
全髋关节置换术治疗骨坏死与骨关节炎的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2023 Dec;47(12):3043-3052. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05761-6. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
4
Redo DAIR: The Game Is Seldom Worth the Candle.再次进行清创、抗生素灌洗术:往往得不偿失。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Dec 22;12(1):18. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12010018.
5
Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention after revision arthroplasty : antibiotic mismatch, timing, and repeated DAIR associated with poor outcome.翻修术后清创、抗生素和植入物保留:抗生素不匹配、时机和重复的 DAIR 与不良结局相关。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Apr;104-B(4):464-471. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B4.BJJ-2021-1264.R1.
6
Risk factors affect success rate of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) in periprosthetic joint infection.风险因素影响假体周围关节感染清创、抗生素治疗及植入物保留(DAIR)的成功率。
Arthroplasty. 2020 Dec 7;2(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s42836-020-00056-2.
7
Does a 2-Stage Debridement Result in Higher Rates of Implant Retention Compared With Single Debridement Alone?两阶段清创是否比单独清创更能提高植入物保留率?
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul;37(7S):S669-S673. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.040. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
8
Modular component exchange and outcome of DAIR for hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection : a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.髋关节和膝关节假体周围感染清创、抗生素骨水泥间隔物植入术的模块化组件交换与结果:一项系统评价和Meta回归分析
Bone Jt Open. 2021 Oct;2(10):806-812. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.210.BJO-2021-0090.R1.
9
Soft-tissue thickness radiographic measurement: a marker to evaluate acute periprosthetic joint infection risk in total hip replacement.软组织厚度的影像学测量:评估全髋关节置换术后假体周围急性感染风险的一项指标
J Bone Jt Infect. 2021 Jun 4;6(6):211-217. doi: 10.5194/jbji-6-211-2021. eCollection 2021.
10
Development of antibiotic resistance in periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染中抗生素耐药性的发展。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jun;103-B(6 Supple A):171-176. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B6.BJJ-2020-1923.R1.