Suppr超能文献

微创后路固定治疗胸腰椎化脓性脊柱炎后病原体鉴定对临床结局的影响:多中心回顾性队列研究。

Impact of causative organism identification on clinical outcomes after minimally invasive posterior fixation for thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis: multicenter retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, 305-8575, Ibaraki, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ibaraki Western Medical Center, Chikusei, Ibaraki, Japan.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2024 Dec;33(12):4682-4692. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08479-0. Epub 2024 Sep 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the difference in treatment duration and unplanned additional surgeries between patients with unidentified causative organisms on empiric antibiotics and those with identified organisms on selective antibiotics in treating thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis with minimally invasive posterior fixation.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis refractory to conservative treatment who underwent minimally invasive posterior fixation. Patients were divided into the identified (known causative organism) and unidentified groups (unknown causative organism). We analyzed data on demographics, antibiotic use, surgical outcomes, and infection control indicators.

RESULTS

We included 74 patients, with 52 (70%) and 22 (30%) in the identified and unidentified groups, respectively. On admission, the identified group had higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and more iliopsoas abscesses. The duration to postoperative CRP negative was similar in the identified and unidentified groups (7.13 vs. 6.48 weeks, p = 0.74). Only the identified group had unplanned additional surgeries due to poor infection control, affecting 6 of 52 patients (12%). Advanced age and causative organism identification increased the additional surgery odds (odds ratio [OR], 8.25; p = 0.033 and OR, 6.83; p = 0.034, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The use of empiric antibiotics in minimally invasive posterior fixation was effective without identifying the causative organism and did not prolong treatment duration. In patients with identified organisms, 12% required unplanned additional surgery, indicating a more challenging infection control. Causative organism identification was associated with the need for additional surgery, suggesting a more cautious treatment strategy for these patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估经验性抗生素治疗中对未确定病原体的患者与选择性抗生素治疗中对确定病原体的患者在微创后路固定治疗胸腰椎化脓性脊柱炎时的治疗持续时间和计划外附加手术的差异。

方法

本多中心回顾性队列研究纳入了接受微创后路固定治疗的保守治疗无效的胸腰椎化脓性脊柱炎患者。患者分为确定组(已知病原体)和未确定组(未知病原体)。我们分析了人口统计学、抗生素使用、手术结果和感染控制指标的数据。

结果

我们纳入了 74 例患者,其中 52 例(70%)和 22 例(30%)为确定组和未确定组。入院时,确定组的 C 反应蛋白(CRP)水平更高,且髂腰肌脓肿更多。确定组和未确定组术后 CRP 转阴的时间相似(7.13 周 vs. 6.48 周,p=0.74)。仅确定组因感染控制不佳而计划外附加手术,影响了 52 例患者中的 6 例(12%)。高龄和病原体鉴定增加了附加手术的几率(优势比 [OR],8.25;p=0.033 和 OR,6.83;p=0.034)。

结论

微创后路固定中使用经验性抗生素治疗有效,无需确定病原体,且不会延长治疗时间。在确定病原体的患者中,12%需要计划外附加手术,表明感染控制更具挑战性。病原体鉴定与需要附加手术相关,提示这些患者需要更谨慎的治疗策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验