Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jiefang Avenue #1277, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, China.
BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 2;24(1):1085. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12864-9.
Bile duct injury is a serious complication after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). If it is not detected early and treated actively, it will not only affect the subsequent tumor-related treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, but also may lead to serious consequences such as infection, liver failure and even death. To analyze the risk factors of bile duct injury after TACE in patients with HCC and explore the predictive indicators of bile duct injury after TACE, which is helpful for doctors to detect and intervene early and avoid the occurrence of serious complications.
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 847 patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent TACE for the first time in our interventional department. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether bile duct injury occurred after TACE: (1) bile duct injury group, N = 55; (2) no bile duct injury group, N = 792. The basic data, intraoperative conditions and the outcome of bile duct injury were analyzed. The chi-square test was used for comparison of enumeration data. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of measurement data. Risk factor analysis was performed using binary logistic regression analysis.
Basic data and intraoperative conditions were compared between the bile duct injury group and the group without bile duct injury: preoperative alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (103.24 ± 32.77U/L vs. 89.17 ± 37.35U/L, P = 0.003); history of hepatobiliary surgery (36.4% vs. 20.8%, P = 0.011); intraoperative lipiodol volume (P = 0.007); combined use of gelatin sponge particles (65.5% vs. 35.0%, P < 0.001); hypovascularity (58.2% vs. 24.5%, P < 0.001); and embolization site (P < 0.001). Comparison of postoperative liver function between bile duct injury group and non-bile duct injury group: postoperative total bilirubin (43.34 ± 25.18umol/L vs. 21.94 ± 9.82umol/L, P < 0.001); postoperative γ-glutamyltransferase(GGT) (188.09 ± 55.62U/L vs. 84.04 ± 36.47U/L, P < 0.001); postoperative ALP(251.51 ± 61.51U/L vs. 99.92 ± 45.98U/L, P < 0.001).
The dosage of lipiodol in TACE, supplementation of gelatin sponge particles, embolization site, and hypovascularity of the tumor are risk factors for biliary duct injury after TACE. After TACE, GGT and ALP increased ≥ 2 times compared with preoperative indicators as predictors of bile duct injury. Bile duct injury occurring after TACE can achieve good outcomes with aggressive management.
胆管损伤是经导管动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)后的一种严重并发症。如果不能早期发现并积极治疗,不仅会影响肝癌(HCC)患者后续的肿瘤相关治疗,还可能导致感染、肝功能衰竭甚至死亡等严重后果。分析 HCC 患者 TACE 后胆管损伤的危险因素,并探讨 TACE 后胆管损伤的预测指标,有助于医生早期发现和干预,避免严重并发症的发生。
回顾性分析我院介入科首次行 TACE 治疗的 847 例原发性肝癌患者的临床资料。根据 TACE 后是否发生胆管损伤将患者分为两组:(1)胆管损伤组,N=55;(2)无胆管损伤组,N=792。分析患者的基本资料、术中情况及胆管损伤结局。计数资料比较采用卡方检验,计量资料比较采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验。采用二项 logistic 回归分析进行危险因素分析。
胆管损伤组与无胆管损伤组的基本资料和术中情况比较:术前碱性磷酸酶(ALP)(103.24±32.77U/L 比 89.17±37.35U/L,P=0.003);有肝胆手术史(36.4%比 20.8%,P=0.011);术中碘油用量(P=0.007);联合使用明胶海绵颗粒(65.5%比 35.0%,P<0.001);肿瘤乏血供(58.2%比 24.5%,P<0.001);栓塞部位(P<0.001)。胆管损伤组与无胆管损伤组术后肝功能比较:术后总胆红素(43.34±25.18μmol/L 比 21.94±9.82μmol/L,P<0.001);术后γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)(188.09±55.62U/L 比 84.04±36.47U/L,P<0.001);术后 ALP(251.51±61.51U/L 比 99.92±45.98U/L,P<0.001)。
TACE 中碘油用量、明胶海绵颗粒的补充、栓塞部位和肿瘤乏血供是 TACE 后胆管损伤的危险因素。TACE 后 GGT 和 ALP 较术前指标升高≥2 倍可作为胆管损伤的预测指标。TACE 后发生的胆管损伤经积极治疗可获得良好结局。