• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良经胫骨技术在解剖学股骨隧道和前交叉韧带重建中取得满意临床疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Anatomic femoral tunnel and satisfactory clinical outcomes achieved with the modified transtibial technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Ling, Xu Junjie, Luo Ye, Guo Luqi, Wang Shaobai

机构信息

School of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, 200th. Hengren Road, Yangpu District, 200438, Shanghai, China.

Department of Sport Medicine, Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600th. Yishan Road, Xuhui District, 201306, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Aug 6;10(16):e35824. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35824. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35824
PMID:39224330
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11367268/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is considered the gold standard treatment for ACL injuries because it aims to restore the knee's normal anatomy and stability, while also protecting long-term knee health. Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes after ACL reconstruction using the modified TT technique are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical and radiological outcomes following ACL reconstruction using modified transtibial (TT) techniques at a minimum 12-month follow-up.

DESIGN

A systematic review with meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases were searched from the inception to December 1, 2022. PICO search strategy was used to identify studies applying modified TT techniques on patients with ACL reconstruction and a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Eligible studies were identified independently by two reviewers. We extracted data on patient demographics, surgical characteristics, patient reported outcomes including subjective evaluations and clinical outcomes. Radiological data including femoral and tibial tunnel position, femoral and tibial tunnel length, and femoral tunnel angle were also extracted. The tunnel position was evaluated using the quadrant method based on three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) images. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated for clinical and radiological outcomes.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies involving 628 patients were finally included. The SMD of Lysholm (90.39; 95 % CI 83.41-97.38), IKDC (86.07; 95 % CI 79.84-92.31), and Tegner (6.15; 95 % CI 3.96-8.33) scores were considered satisfactory. The depth of the femoral tunnel showed a pooled SMD of 30.08 % (95 % CI 28.25-31.91 %), and the height showed a pooled SMD of 37.72 % (95 % CI 35.75-39.70 %). The pooled SMD for the femoral tunnel angle in the coronal plane was 48.27°(95 % CI 43.14-53.40°), and the pooled SMD for the femoral tunnel length was 33.98 mm (95 % CI 29.03-38.93 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation has shown that modified TT technique can create an anatomic femoral tunnel and maintain optimal tunnel length and angulation. Most patients had satisfactory subjective outcomes and physical examinations after ACL reconstruction using modified TT technique. This information may assist in guiding expectations of clinicians and patients following ACL reconstruction with modified TT technique.

摘要

背景

解剖学前交叉韧带(ACL)重建被认为是ACL损伤的金标准治疗方法,因为它旨在恢复膝关节的正常解剖结构和稳定性,同时保护膝关节的长期健康。使用改良经胫骨(TT)技术进行ACL重建后的长期临床和放射学结果尚不清楚。

目的

评估使用改良经胫骨(TT)技术进行ACL重建后至少12个月随访的临床和放射学结果。

设计

一项系统评价并进行荟萃分析。

方法

检索了PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆和MEDLINE数据库,检索时间从建库至2022年12月1日。采用PICO检索策略,以确定对ACL重建患者应用改良TT技术且随访至少12个月的研究。两名评价者独立识别符合条件的研究。我们提取了患者人口统计学、手术特征、患者报告的结果(包括主观评价和临床结果)的数据。还提取了放射学数据,包括股骨和胫骨隧道位置、股骨和胫骨隧道长度以及股骨隧道角度。基于三维计算机断层扫描(3D CT)图像,使用象限法评估隧道位置。计算临床和放射学结果的标准化均数差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

最终纳入16项研究,共628例患者。Lysholm评分(90.39;95%CI 83.41 - 97.38)、IKDC评分(86.07;95%CI 79.84 - 92.31)和Tegner评分(6.15;95%CI 3.96 - 8.33)的SMD被认为是令人满意的。股骨隧道深度的合并SMD为30.08%(95%CI 28.25 - 31.91%),高度的合并SMD为37.72%(95%CI 35.75 - 39.70%)。冠状面股骨隧道角度的合并SMD为48.27°(95%CI 43.14 - 53.40°),股骨隧道长度的合并SMD为33.98 mm(95%CI 29.03 - 38.93 mm)。

结论

本研究表明,改良TT技术可以创建解剖学股骨隧道,并保持最佳的隧道长度和角度。大多数患者在使用改良TT技术进行ACL重建后主观结果和体格检查令人满意。这些信息可能有助于指导临床医生和患者对改良TT技术进行ACL重建后的预期。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8070/11367268/a3f1267af7c1/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8070/11367268/780aa8074a8d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8070/11367268/caf72b1e7cee/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8070/11367268/27d0a67842a2/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8070/11367268/2d03da418c9b/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8070/11367268/a3f1267af7c1/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8070/11367268/780aa8074a8d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8070/11367268/caf72b1e7cee/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8070/11367268/27d0a67842a2/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8070/11367268/2d03da418c9b/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8070/11367268/a3f1267af7c1/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Anatomic femoral tunnel and satisfactory clinical outcomes achieved with the modified transtibial technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.改良经胫骨技术在解剖学股骨隧道和前交叉韧带重建中取得满意临床疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 6;10(16):e35824. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35824. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
2
Modified transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of femoral tunnel position and clinical results.解剖单束前交叉韧带重建中改良经胫骨与前内侧入路技术:股骨隧道位置及临床结果比较
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Dec;42(12):2941-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546514551922. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
3
Transtibial Versus Anteromedial Portal Technique for Femoral Tunnel Drilling in Primary Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Level 1 and 2 Evidence of Clinical, Revision, and Radiological Outcomes.初次单束前交叉韧带重建中经胫骨与前内侧入路技术钻取股骨隧道的比较:对临床、翻修及影像学结果的1级和2级证据的Meta分析
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Jan;51(1):250-262. doi: 10.1177/03635465211044476. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
4
Femoral and tibial graft tunnel parameters after transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.经胫骨、前内侧入路和由外向内单束前交叉韧带重建术后的股骨和胫骨移植隧道参数。
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):2250-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546515590221. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
5
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Anteromedial Portal Versus Transtibial Technique in ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.前内侧入路与经胫骨技术在 ACL 重建中的临床和影像学结果:一项系统评价
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jul 2;9(7):23259671211024591. doi: 10.1177/23259671211024591. eCollection 2021 Jul.
6
Graft position in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anteromedial versus transtibial technique.关节镜下前交叉韧带重建术中移植物的位置:前内侧与经胫骨技术对比
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Nov;136(11):1571-1580. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2532-7. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
7
Systemic Review of Anatomic Single- Versus Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Does Femoral Tunnel Drilling Technique Matter?解剖式单束与双束前交叉韧带重建的系统评价:股骨隧道钻取技术是否重要?
Arthroscopy. 2016 Sep;32(9):1887-904. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 May 13.
8
Evaluation of Tibial Tunnel Location with the Femoral Tunnel Created Behind the Resident's Ridge in Transtibial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.胫骨隧道定位评估在经胫骨前交叉韧带重建术中居民脊后股骨隧道中的应用。
J Knee Surg. 2022 Aug;35(10):1132-1137. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722568. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
9
Does the anteromedial portal provide clinical superiority compared to the transtibial portal in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in nonprofessional athletes in short-term follow-up?在非职业运动员前交叉韧带重建的短期随访中,与经胫骨入路相比,前内侧入路是否具有临床优势?
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(5):483-91. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.15.0016.
10
Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique.经胫骨与前内侧入路扩髓在前交叉韧带重建中的比较:手术技术的解剖学和生物力学评估。
Arthroscopy. 2011 Mar;27(3):380-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.07.018. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Modified Transtibial Technique: Outcomes and Return to Sport in Athletes.改良经胫骨技术在前交叉韧带重建中的应用:运动员的治疗结果及恢复运动情况
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 4;13(9):1056. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13091056.
2
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Lateral Extra-Articular Procedures: A Systematic Review.使用外侧关节外手术进行前交叉韧带重建:一项系统评价
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 8;61(2):294. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020294.

本文引用的文献

1
Current development in surgical techniques, graft selection and additional procedures for anterior cruciate ligament injury: a path towards anatomic restoration and improved clinical outcomes-a narrative review.前交叉韧带损伤的手术技术、移植物选择及附加手术的当前进展:走向解剖学重建及改善临床结果的路径——一篇叙述性综述
Ann Jt. 2023 Sep 1;8:39. doi: 10.21037/aoj-23-39. eCollection 2023.
2
Anteromedial Portal Technique, but Not Outside-in Technique, Is Superior to Standard Transtibial Technique in Knee Stability and Functional Recovery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Network Meta-analysis.前内侧入路技术优于标准胫骨入路技术,而不是外侧入路技术,可改善前交叉韧带重建后膝关节稳定性和功能恢复:一项网状 Meta 分析。
Arthroscopy. 2023 Jun;39(6):1515-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.11.026. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
3
Multiple revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: not the best but still good.多次翻修前交叉韧带重建:并非最佳但仍有效。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Feb;31(2):559-571. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07197-8. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
4
Superior rotational stability and lower re-ruptures rate after combined anterolateral and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared to isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 2-year prospective randomized clinical trial.与单纯前交叉韧带重建相比,前外侧和前交叉韧带重建后具有更好的旋转稳定性和更低的再断裂率:一项为期 2 年的前瞻性随机临床试验。
Phys Sportsmed. 2023 Aug;51(4):371-378. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2022.2112914. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
5
[Bone tunnel positions in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by three-dimensional CT reconstruction based on Mimics software:modified transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique].[基于Mimics软件的三维CT重建评估前交叉韧带重建中骨隧道位置:改良经胫骨与前内侧入路技术]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2021 Dec 25;34(12):1126-31. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.12.007.
6
Hybrid Transtibial Femoral Preparation for Transphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Radiographic Comparison With the Transtibial and Anteromedial Portal Techniques.用于经骨骺前交叉韧带重建的混合胫股准备:与经胫骨和前内侧入路技术的影像学比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Nov 18;9(11):23259671211054509. doi: 10.1177/23259671211054509. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with modified transtibial and anteromedial portal.经改良胫骨前内侧入路行前交叉韧带重建的临床疗效。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2023 Mar;107(1):37-45. doi: 10.1007/s12306-021-00727-6. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
8
Independent Versus Transtibial Drilling in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis With Meta-regression.前交叉韧带重建中独立钻孔与经胫骨钻孔的比较:一项包含Meta回归的Meta分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jul 12;9(7):23259671211015616. doi: 10.1177/23259671211015616. eCollection 2021 Jul.
9
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Anteromedial Portal Versus Transtibial Technique in ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.前内侧入路与经胫骨技术在 ACL 重建中的临床和影像学结果:一项系统评价
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jul 2;9(7):23259671211024591. doi: 10.1177/23259671211024591. eCollection 2021 Jul.
10
Anteromedial Portal Reference Technique for Femoral Tunnel Depth Measurement During Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.关节镜下前交叉韧带重建术中用于测量股骨隧道深度的前内侧入路参考技术
Cureus. 2021 Feb 5;13(2):e13147. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13147.