Suppr超能文献

通过多学科勾画和同行评审增强头颈部放疗靶区定义:一项前瞻性单中心研究。

Enhanced head and neck radiotherapy target definition through multidisciplinary delineation and peer review: A prospective single-center study.

作者信息

Dragan Tatiana, Soussy Kaoutar, Beauvois Sylvie, Lefebvre Yolene, Lemort Marc, Ozalp Elcin, Gulyban Akos, Burghelea Manuela, Wardi Clémence Al, Marin Clementine, Benkhaled Sofian, Van Gestel Dirk

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology (Head and Neck Unit), Institut Jules Bordet, Hopital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hassan II, Fes, Morocco.

出版信息

Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024 Aug 8;48:100837. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100837. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

This study evaluates the benefit of weekly delineation and peer review by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) of radiation oncologists (ROs), radiologists (RXs), and nuclear medicine (NM) physicians in defining primary and lymph node tumor volumes (GTVp and GTVn) for head and neck cancer (HNC) radiotherapy. This study includes 30 consecutive HNC patients referred for definitive curative (chemo)-radiotherapy. Imaging data including head and neck MRI, [18F]-FDG-PET and CT scan were evaluated by the MDT. The RO identified the 'undeniable' tumor as GTVp_core and determined GTVp_max, representing the maximum tumoral volume. The MDT delineation (MDT-D) by RX and NM physicians outlined their respective primary GTVs (GTVp_RX and GTVp_NM). During the MDT meeting (MDT-M), these contours were discussed to reach a consensus on the final primary GTV (GTVp_final). In the comparative analysis of various GTVp delineations, we performed descriptive statistics and assessed two MDT-M factors: 1) the added value of MDT-M, which includes the section of GTVp_final outside GTVp_core but within GTVp_RX or GTVp_NM, and 2) the part of GTVp_final that deviates from GTVp_max, representing the area missed by the RO. For GTVn, discussions evaluated lymph node extent and malignancy, documenting findings and the frequency of disagreements. The average GTVp core and max volumes were 19.5 cc (range: 0.4-90.1) and 22.1 cc (range: 0.8-106.2), respectively. Compared to GTVp_core, MDT-D to GTVp_final added an average of 3.3 cc (range: 0-25.6) and spared an average of 1.3 cc (0-15.6). Compared to GTVp_max, MDT-D and -M added an average of 2.7 cc (range: 0-20.3) and removed 2.3 cc (0-21.3). The most frequent GTVn discussions included morphologically suspicious nodes not fixing on [18F]-FDG-PET and small [18F]-FDG-PET negative retropharyngeal lymph nodes. Multidisciplinary review of target contours in HNC is essential for accurate treatment planning, ensuring precise tumor and lymph node delineation, potentially improving local control and reducing toxicity.

摘要

本研究评估了由放射肿瘤学家(RO)、放射科医生(RX)和核医学(NM)医生组成的多学科团队(MDT)每周进行轮廓勾画和同行评审,在确定头颈癌(HNC)放疗的原发肿瘤和淋巴结肿瘤体积(GTVp和GTVn)方面的益处。本研究纳入了30例连续转诊接受根治性(化疗)放疗的HNC患者。MDT对包括头颈MRI、[18F]-FDG-PET和CT扫描在内的影像数据进行了评估。RO将“不可否认”的肿瘤确定为GTVp_core,并确定了代表最大肿瘤体积的GTVp_max。RX和NM医生进行的MDT轮廓勾画(MDT-D)勾勒出了各自的原发GTV(GTVp_RX和GTVp_NM)。在MDT会议(MDT-M)期间,对这些轮廓进行了讨论,以就最终的原发GTV(GTVp_final)达成共识。在对各种GTVp轮廓勾画的对比分析中,我们进行了描述性统计,并评估了MDT-M的两个因素:1)MDT-M的附加值,包括GTVp_final在GTVp_core之外但在GTVp_RX或GTVp_NM之内的部分;2)GTVp_final偏离GTVp_max的部分,代表RO遗漏的区域。对于GTVn,讨论评估了淋巴结范围和恶性程度,记录了发现结果和分歧频率。GTVp核心体积和最大体积的平均值分别为19.5 cc(范围:0.4 - 90.1)和22.1 cc(范围:0.8 - 106.2)。与GTVp_core相比,MDT-D至GTVp_final平均增加了3.3 cc(范围:0 - 25.6),平均减少了1.3 cc(0 - 15.6)。与GTVp_max相比,MDT-D和-M平均增加了2.7 cc(范围:0 - 20.3),减少了2.3 cc(0 - 21.3)。最常见的GTVn讨论包括形态学上可疑但在[18F]-FDG-PET上未固定的淋巴结以及小的[18F]-FDG-PET阴性的咽后淋巴结。对头颈癌靶区轮廓进行多学科评审对于准确的治疗计划至关重要,可确保精确勾勒肿瘤和淋巴结,有可能提高局部控制率并降低毒性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e347/11366888/7468f448f69e/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验