• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沙袋自由压迫随访对经股动脉入路行经皮介入治疗患者的影响。

Effects of Sandbag-Free Follow-up After Manual Compression in Patients Who Underwent Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Intervention.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Necmettin Erbakan University, Faculty of Medicine, Konya, Türkiye.

Department of Cardiology, Beyhekim Training and Research Hospital, Konya, Türkiye.

出版信息

Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2024 Sep;52(6):394-399. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2024.59987.

DOI:10.5543/tkda.2024.59987
PMID:39225641
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Femoral access site complications (ASC) are frequent yet significant conditions associated with percutaneous intervention procedures that affect patient-physician comfort. In this study, we compared ASC rates between patients who received compression with a sandbag, the standard practice in many clinics, and patients monitored solely with bedrest without sandbag compression.

METHODS

This study included patients undergoing any transfemoral percutaneous intervention (mostly coronary interventions) between April 2019 and May 2023 at our clinic. Patients were classified into two groups: those monitored without a sandbag (n = 160) and those with a sandbag (n = 158). ASC rates (ecchymosis, pseudoaneurysm, hematoma, bleeding) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

No differences were observed between the two groups in gender, age, sheath size, and bed rest times. Complications were observed in 16.9% (n = 27) of patients without sandbags and 25.3% (n = 40) of patients with sandbags. The most common complication was ecchymosis, seen in 10.6% (n = 17) of the no-sandbag group and 13.9% (n = 22) of the sandbag group.

CONCLUSION

Following manual compression after femoral sheath removal, patients receiving bedrest without sandbag use are less likely to develop ASC. Additionally, dismissing sandbag use leads to a significant increase in patient comfort.

摘要

目的

股动脉入路并发症(ASC)是与经皮介入治疗相关的常见且严重的情况,会影响医患舒适度。本研究比较了接受沙袋压迫(许多诊所的标准做法)和仅卧床休息不使用沙袋压迫的患者 ASC 发生率。

方法

本研究纳入了 2019 年 4 月至 2023 年 5 月期间在我院行任何经股动脉经皮介入治疗(主要为冠状动脉介入)的患者。患者分为两组:未使用沙袋组(n=160)和使用沙袋组(n=158)。比较两组 ASC 发生率(瘀斑、假性动脉瘤、血肿、出血)。

结果

两组患者在性别、年龄、鞘管大小和卧床时间方面无差异。未使用沙袋的患者中有 16.9%(n=27)出现并发症,使用沙袋的患者中有 25.3%(n=40)出现并发症。最常见的并发症是瘀斑,未使用沙袋组有 10.6%(n=17)患者发生,使用沙袋组有 13.9%(n=22)患者发生。

结论

股鞘拔出后进行手动压迫后,不使用沙袋卧床休息的患者 ASC 发生率较低。此外,不使用沙袋会显著提高患者舒适度。

相似文献

1
Effects of Sandbag-Free Follow-up After Manual Compression in Patients Who Underwent Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Intervention.沙袋自由压迫随访对经股动脉入路行经皮介入治疗患者的影响。
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2024 Sep;52(6):394-399. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2024.59987.
2
[Comparison of controlled pressure belt -allowing mobility to sandbags after percutaneous coronary intervention: pilot study].经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后可控压力束带与沙袋固定的比较:初步研究
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2013 Dec;41(8):699-704. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2013.04742.
3
Minimizing short-term complications in patients who have undergone cardiac invasive procedure: a randomized controlled trial involving position change and sandbag.减少接受心脏侵入性手术患者的短期并发症:一项涉及体位改变和沙袋的随机对照试验。
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2007 Dec;7(4):390-6.
4
Nursing interventions to decrease bleeding at the femoral access site after percutaneous coronary intervention. SANDBAG Nursing Coordinators. Standards of Angioplasty Nursing Techniques to Diminish Bleeding Around the Groin.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后减少股动脉穿刺部位出血的护理干预措施。沙袋护理协调员。减少腹股沟周围出血的血管成形术护理技术标准。
Am J Crit Care. 1999 Sep;8(5):303-13.
5
Effect of positioning on patient outcomes after coronary angiography: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.冠状动脉造影术后体位对患者结局的影响:一项单盲随机对照试验。
J Nurs Res. 2014 Mar;22(1):45-50. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000020.
6
Effect of changing the duration of keeping sandbag over catheter insertion site on the coronary angiography acute complications: A controlled clinical trial.改变沙袋置于导管插入部位的持续时间对冠状动脉造影急性并发症的影响:一项对照临床试验。
J Vasc Nurs. 2017 Dec;35(4):193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
7
Clinical investigation of transradial access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction.经桡动脉入路行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死的临床研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1139-42. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S50939. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
8
A randomized controlled trial assessing the use of compression versus vasoconstriction in the treatment of femoral hematoma occurring after percutaneous coronary intervention.一项随机对照试验,评估加压与血管收缩在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后股部血肿治疗中的应用。
Heart Lung. 2008 May-Jun;37(3):205-10. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2007.05.008.
9
A randomized comparison of a percutaneous suture device versus manual compression for femoral artery hemostasis after PTCA.经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术(PTCA)后,使用经皮缝合装置与手动压迫法进行股动脉止血的随机对照研究。
J Interv Cardiol. 2003 Jun;16(3):217-21. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003.8044.x.
10
Comparison of manual compression and vascular hemostasis devices after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention through femoral artery access: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经股动脉途径进行冠状动脉造影或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后手动压迫与血管止血装置的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Mar;19(2):151-162. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Aug 19.