• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一项预先护理计划实用试验中使用模拟评估实施保真度的可行性。

Feasibility of Using Simulation to Evaluate Implementation Fidelity in an Advance Care Planning Pragmatic Trial.

作者信息

Cotter Valerie T, Sloan Danetta H, Scerpella Daniel L, Smith Kelly M, Abshire Saylor Martha, Wolff Jennifer L

机构信息

Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Health Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Aug;42(8):785-791. doi: 10.1177/10499091241282087. Epub 2024 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1177/10499091241282087
PMID:39226471
Abstract

Traditional methods of fidelity monitoring are not possible in pragmatic trials in real-world clinical settings. We describe our approach to monitoring and reinforcing the fidelity to ACP conversations for a hard-to-reach subpopulation by using standardized patients in a pragmatic trial. We developed standardized patient scenarios grounded in the Respecting Choices First Steps™ Advance Care Planning curriculum to provide an opportunity to reinforce and assess ACP facilitator competency. Scenarios represented one-on-one encounters. The first case was a standardized patient with cognitive impairment and the second case involved a standardized patient with dementia and their care partner. A previously validated fidelity checklist was used to score skills and behaviors observed during simulations including encounter set-up, ACP topics, and general communication. Simulations involved voice teleconferencing to align primary modality of ACP in the pragmatic trial. Six facilitators completed two standardized patient cases each. Overall fidelity scores were moderately high (78.8% ± 11.7; 63.4 - 95.6) for the case with cognitive impairment and for the case with the patient with dementia and care partner (76.2% ± 13.0; 54.4 - 91.5). Simulation using standardized patients supported fidelity monitoring and provided coachable feedback to support facilitator competency. Our study can help inform future research and training related to advance care planning in older adults living with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders.

摘要

在现实世界临床环境中的务实试验中,传统的保真度监测方法是不可行的。我们描述了在一项务实试验中,通过使用标准化患者来监测和加强针对难以接触到的亚人群进行的预立医疗照护规划(ACP)对话保真度的方法。我们根据“尊重选择第一步”高级医疗照护规划课程开发了标准化患者场景,以提供强化和评估ACP促进者能力的机会。场景代表一对一的会面。第一个案例是一名患有认知障碍的标准化患者,第二个案例涉及一名患有痴呆症的标准化患者及其护理伙伴。使用先前验证过的保真度检查表对模拟过程中观察到的技能和行为进行评分,包括会面设置、ACP主题和一般沟通。模拟采用语音电话会议,以与务实试验中ACP的主要方式保持一致。六名促进者每人完成了两个标准化患者案例。对于认知障碍案例以及患有痴呆症的患者及其护理伙伴的案例,总体保真度得分中等偏高(分别为78.8%±11.7;63.4 - 95.6和76.2%±13.0;54.4 - 91.5)。使用标准化患者进行模拟有助于保真度监测,并提供可指导的反馈以支持促进者的能力。我们的研究可为未来与患有阿尔茨海默病及相关疾病的老年人的预立医疗照护规划相关的研究和培训提供参考。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of Using Simulation to Evaluate Implementation Fidelity in an Advance Care Planning Pragmatic Trial.在一项预先护理计划实用试验中使用模拟评估实施保真度的可行性。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Aug;42(8):785-791. doi: 10.1177/10499091241282087. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Clinical judgement by primary care physicians for the diagnosis of all-cause dementia or cognitive impairment in symptomatic people.初级保健医生对有症状人群进行全因痴呆或认知障碍诊断的临床判断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 16;6(6):CD012558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012558.pub2.
4
Serious Illness Conversations in the Emergency Department for Older Adults With Advanced Illnesses: A Randomized Clinical Trial.针对患有晚期疾病的老年人在急诊科进行的重病谈话:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2516582. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.16582.
5
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
6
Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 2;12(12):CD011513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011513.pub2.
7
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
8
Reminiscence therapy for dementia.痴呆症的回忆疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 1;3(3):CD001120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001120.pub3.
9
Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 28;9(9):CD011513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011513.pub3.
10
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.